Cited by 473Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Impaired safety signal learning may be a biomarker of PTSD

Open access
Jovanovic, Tanja, Kazama, Andrew, Bachevalier, Jocelyne, Davis, Michael·2012·Neuropharmacology

Abstract

A dysregulated fear response is one of the hallmark clinical presentations of patients suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). These patients show over-generalization of fear and in tandem an inability to inhibit fear responses in the presence of safety. Here, we summarize our recent findings using a conditional discrimination paradigm, which assesses safety signal processing (AX+/BX-) in combat and civilian PTSD populations. Overall, PTSD subjects demonstrate a lack of safety signal learning and an inability to modulate the fear responses with safety cues. We then review studies of the neurobiology of fear expression and inhibition in humans and non-humans, in order to provide a background for preliminary studies using reverse translation procedures in which the same AX+/BX- paradigm was used in rhesus macaques. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder'.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.02.023

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elevated CRP is associated with impaired inhibition of fear-potentiated startle in the presence of a safety signal.

    “Furthermore, elevated CRP is also associated with impaired inhibition of fear-potentiated startle in the presence of a safety signal, a well-characterized biomarker of PTSD (Jovanovic et al, 2012).”

    From Inflammation in Fear- and Anxiety-Based Disorders: PTSD, GAD, and Beyond (2017) · cites this paper as Jovanovic et al, 2012

    Section 1.5 (page unavailable) describes impaired safety-signal learning and fear inhibition as specific markers of PTSD symptoms, supporting the biomarker description. It presents biomarker status as a suggestion rather than an established fact. The paper does not address the sentence’s association with elevated CRP. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PTSD patients have difficulty learning safety discrimination.

    “as well as difficulty learning safety discrimination, another form of inhibitory learning where the subjects are trained to differentiate between a safe versus dangerous cue or context (Jovanovic, Kazama, Bachevalier, & Davis, 2012; Jovanovic et al., 2010, 2009; Lissek et al., 2005; for a review, see Christianson et al., 2012).”

    From Nicotine addiction and psychiatric disorders (2015) · cites this paper as Jovanovic et al., 2012

  • PTSD patients have shown increased fear responses to cues that they subjectively report as safe.

    “For example, PTSD patients have shown increased fear responses to cues that they subjectively report as safe (28).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pavlov IP Conditioned Reflexes Oxford University Press 1927

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jovanovic, T., Kazama, A., Bachevalier, J., & Davis, M.
Affiliations
  • Emory National Primate Research Center (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Venue
Neuropharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
695-704
ISSN
0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066642195
Cited by
473
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000454)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH058846, MH-086947, R37MH47840, F32MH070129, R37MH047840, R33MH086947, R21MH086947, R21MH092576, MH 58846)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025008)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD035471, HD35471)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, fear extinction, fear inhibition, conditional discrimination, fear expression, rhesus monkeys, reverse translation, biomarkers
MeSH terms
Association Learning, Conditioning, Psychological, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Humans, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review