Cited by 34Memory and Neural MechanismsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Versatility of fear-potentiated startle paradigms for assessing human conditioned fear extinction and return of fear

Open access
Norrholm, Seth D., Anderson, Kemp M., Olin, Ilana W., Jovanovic, Tanja, Kwon, Cliffe, Warren, Victor T., McCarthy, Alexander, Bosshardt, Lauren +4 more·2011·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Fear conditioning methodologies have often been employed as testable models for assessing learned fear responses in individuals with anxiety disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and specific phobia. One frequently used paradigm is measurement of the acoustic startle reflex under conditions that mimic anxiogenic and fear-related conditions. For example, fear-potentiated startle is the relative increase in the frequency or magnitude of the acoustic startle reflex in the presence of a previously neutral cue (e.g., colored shape; termed the conditioned stimulus or CS+) that has been repeatedly paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (e.g., airblast to the larynx). Our group has recently used fear-potentiated startle paradigms to demonstrate impaired fear extinction in civilian and combat populations with PTSD. In the current study, we examined the use of either auditory or visual CSs in a fear extinction protocol that we have validated and applied to human clinical conditions. This represents an important translational bridge in that numerous animal studies of fear extinction, upon which much of the human work is based, have employed the use of auditory CSs as opposed to visual CSs. Participants in both the auditory and visual groups displayed robust fear-potentiated startle to the CS+, clear discrimination between the reinforced CS+ and non-reinforced CS-, significant extinction to the previously reinforced CS+, and marked spontaneous recovery. We discuss the current results as they relate to future investigations of PTSD-related impairments in fear processing in populations with diverse medical and psychiatric histories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00077

Cites

34 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. First M. B. Spitzer R. L. Gibbon M. Williams J. B. W. (2002). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition (SCID-I/P). New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute
  2. Hoge C. W. (2010). Once a Warrior Always a Warrior: Navigating the Transition from Combat to Home, Including Combat Stress, PTSD and mTBI. Guilford, CT: Globe Pequot Press
  3. Norrholm S. D. Jovanovic T. Olin I. W. Sands L. A. Karapanou I. Bradley B. Ressler K. J. (2011). Fear extinction in traumatized civilians with posttraumatic stress disorder: relation to symptom severity. Biol. Psychiatry 69, 556– 563 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.013 21035787 PMC3052965 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norrholm, S. D., Anderson, K. M., Olin, I. W., Jovanovic, T., Kwon, C., Warren, V. T., McCarthy, A., Bosshardt, L., Sabree, J., Duncan, E. J., Rothbaum, B. O., & Bradley, B.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Norrholm, Seth D.
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2011
Volume
5
Pages
77-77
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092682105
Cited by
34
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH, W81XWH1011045)
  • Emory University (RR025008)
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institutes of Health (5u19mh069056-10, W81XWH, UL1TR000454, RR025008)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U19-MH069056, MH092576, 1R01MH70880-01-A2, MH069056, R34MH083078, R01MH070880, R21MH092576)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA018294)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025008, RR025008)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (W81XWH-08-2-0170)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
fear-potentiated startle, fear extinction, return of fear, fear conditioning, post-traumatic stress disorder, specific phobia, acoustic startle response, auditory conditioned stimulus, spontaneous recovery, anxiety disorders, fear processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review