Cited by 66Quantum optics and atomic interactionsQuantum Information and CryptographyCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

Dispersive optical systems for scalable Raman driving of hyperfine qubits

Open access
Levine, Harry, Bluvstein, Dolev, Keesling, Alexander, Wang, Tout T., Ebadi, Sepehr, Semeghini, Giulia, Omran, Ahmed, Greiner, Markus +2 more·2022·Physical Review A

Abstract

The authors design and implement a laser system using novel phase modulation and highly dispersive element techniques for realizing high-fidelity control over atomic hyperfine states, which are useful as qubits in quantum information processing. This approach is demonstrated in a neutral ${}^{87}$Rb atomic system and could also be applied to trapped-ion systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.105.032618

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When performing properly, total single-qubit error is consistent with state preparation and measurement (SPAM), an effective coherence time of 1-2 s and the Raman scattering error of all Raman pulses.

    “When performing properly, our total single-qubit error is consistent with state preparation and measurement (SPAM)8, an effective coherence time of 1–2 s and the Raman scattering error of all the Raman pulses7,63.”

    From Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays (2024) · cites this paper as [63]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levine, H., Bluvstein, D., Keesling, A., Wang, T. T., Ebadi, S., Semeghini, G., Omran, A., Greiner, M., Vuletić, V., & Lukin, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2022-03-29
Volume
105
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9926
  • 2469-9934
OpenAlex
W3208787009
Cited by
66
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DGE1745303)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0021013)
  • Army Research Office
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate
  • Hertz Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Keywords
hyperfine qubits, phase modulation, dispersive elements, rubidium-87 atoms, neutral atoms, trapped ions, quantum information processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review