The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Open accessAbstract
Entanglement purification protocols (EPPs) and quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) provide two ways of protecting quantum states from interaction with the environment. In an EPP, perfectly entangled pure states are extracted, with some yield D, from a mixed state M shared by two parties; with a QECC, an arbitrary quantum state |\ensuremath{\xi}〉 can be transmitted at some rate Q through a noisy channel \ensuremath{\chi} without degradation. We prove that an EPP involving one-way classical communication and acting on mixed state M^(\ensuremath{\chi}) (obtained by sharing halves of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pairs through a channel \ensuremath{\chi}) yields a QECC on \ensuremath{\chi} with rate Q=D, and vice versa. We compare the amount of entanglement E(M) required to prepare a mixed state M by local actions with the amounts ${\mathit{D}}_{1}$(M) and ${\mathit{D}}_{2}$(M) that can be locally distilled from it by EPPs using one- and two-way classical communication, respectively, and give an exact expression for E(M) when M is Bell diagonal. While EPPs require classical communication, QECCs do not, and we prove Q is not increased by adding one-way classical communication. However, both D and Q can be increased by adding two-way communication. We show that certain noisy quantum channels, for example a 50% depolarizing channel, can be used for reliable transmission of quantum states if two-way communication is available, but cannot be used if only one-way communication is available. We exhibit a family of codes based on universal hashing able to achieve an asymptotic Q (or D) of 1-S for simple noise models, where S is the error entropy. We also obtain a specific, simple 5-bit single-error-correcting quantum block code. We prove that iff a QECC results in high fidelity for the case of no error then the QECC can be recast into a form where the encoder is the matrix inverse of the decoder. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This experimental method of measuring the R matrix enables us a complete determination of not only steering measures, but also a fully entangled fraction (FEF)57 and Bell nonlocality measures58.”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [57]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Non-maximally entangled states have been shown to reduce the required detector efficiencies for loophole-free tests of Bell inequalities [13]”
From Nonmaximally Entangled States: Production, Characterization, and Utilization (1999) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Any quantity that is supposed to quantify entanglement needs to be monotonously decreasing under such operations [25,41].”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [41]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703
Self-citationOn the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880 · Cited by 7,573
Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states
Bennett, C. H., & Wiesner, S. J. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2881 · Cited by 5,470
Self-citationA single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406
Self-citationSeparability Criterion for Density Matrices
Peres, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.1413 · Cited by 5,191
Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory
Shor, P. W. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r2493 · Cited by 4,479
Elementary gates for quantum computation
Barenco, A., Bennett, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J. A., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.3457 · Cited by 4,311
Self-citationQuantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
Werner, R. F. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.40.4277 · Cited by 4,062
Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations
Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, H. J., Popescu, S., & Schumacher, B. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2046 · Cited by 3,151
Self-citationNew High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs
Kwiat, P. G., Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., Sergienko, A. V., & Shih, Y. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4337 · Cited by 3,102
Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Popescu, S., Schumacher, B., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.722 · Cited by 2,961
Self-citationError Correcting Codes in Quantum Theory
Steane, A. M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.793 · Cited by 2,677
Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods
Peres, A., & Ballentine, L. E. (1995) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.17946 · Cited by 2,561
Quantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., & Mermin, N. D. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.557 · Cited by 2,536
Self-citationGood quantum error-correcting codes exist
Calderbank, A. R., & Shor, P. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1098 · Cited by 2,516
Experimental Tests of Realistic Local Theories via Bell's Theorem
Aspect, A., Grangier, P., & Roger, G. (1981) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.47.460 · Cited by 2,294
(1996) · Cited by 2,280
Wehrl, A. (1978) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.50.221 · Cited by 1,963
Fidelity for Mixed Quantum States
Jozsa, R. (1994) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500349414552171 · Cited by 1,911
Group theory and quantum mechanics
Tinkham, M. (1964) · Cited by 1,837
Bell's theorem. Experimental tests and implications
Clauser, J. F., & Shimony, A. (1978) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/41/12/002 · Cited by 1,551
Generalized privacy amplification
Bennett, C. H., Gilles Brassard, A., Crépeau, C., & Maurer, U. M. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.476316 · Cited by 1,426
Self-citationQuantum Privacy Amplification and the Security of Quantum Cryptography over Noisy Channels
Deutsch, D., Ekert, A., Jozsa, R., Macchiavello, C., Popescu, S., & Sanpera, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.2818 · Cited by 1,268
Schumacher, B. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.51.2738 · Cited by 1,090
Perfect Quantum Error Correcting Code
Laflamme, R., Miquel, C., Paz, J. P., & Zurek, W. H. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.198 · Cited by 966
Multiple particle interference and quantum error correction
Steane, A. M. (1996) · Cited by 871
Bell's inequality holds for all non-product states
Gisin, N. (1991) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(91)90805-i · Cited by 781
Quantum Information and Computation
Bennett, C. H. (1995) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.881452 · Cited by 574
Self-citationBell’s inequalities versus teleportation: What is nonlocality?
Popescu, S. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.797 · Cited by 537
Bell's Inequalities and Density Matrices: Revealing “Hidden” Nonlocality
Popescu, S. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.2619 · Cited by 441
Fault-Tolerant Error Correction with Efficient Quantum Codes
Divincenzo, D. P., & Shor, P. W. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3260 · Cited by 353
Self-citationQuantum Error Correction for Communication
EKERT, A. K., & Macchiavello, C. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.2585 · Cited by 293
Bennett, C. H., Gilles Brassard, A., Popescu, S., Schumacher, B. W., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1997) · Bristol Research (University of Bristol) · Cited by 260
Self-citationError prevention scheme with four particles
Lev Vaidman, A., Goldenberg, L., & Wiesner, S. J. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.r1745 · Cited by 114
Inversion of Quantum Jumps in Quantum Optical Systems under Continuous Observation
Mabuchi, H., & Zoller, P. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.3108 · Cited by 110
Chuang, I. L., & Yamamoto, Y. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.4281 · Cited by 109
Quantum error correction in the presence of spontaneous emission
Plenio, M. B., Vedral, V., & Knight, P. L. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.55.67 · Cited by 82
Generators for Certain Alternating Groups with Applications to Cryptography
Coppersmith, D., & Grossman, E. (1975) · SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1137/0129051 · Cited by 73
Quantum Error-Correcting Codes Need Not Completely Reveal the Error SyndromePreprint
Shor, P. W., & Smolin, J. A. (1996) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9604006 · Cited by 72
Self-citationQuantum error correction of dephasing in 3 qubitsPreprint
Braunstein, S. L. (1996) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9603024 · Cited by 30
Quantum Error Correction by CodingPreprint
Chuang, I. L., & Laflamme, R. (1995) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9511003 · Cited by 24
Distillability of Inseparable Quantum SystemsPreprint
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (1996) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9607009 · Cited by 9
On the necessary and sufficient conditions for separability of quantum mixed states
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, R., & Horodecki, P. (1996) · Cited by 6
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- C. H. Bennett, 1996, Phys. Today, 48
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 · Cited by 8,290
Self-citationQuantum information with continuous variables
Braunstein, S. L., & van Loock, P. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.513 · Cited by 3,858
Entanglement in many-body systems
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., & Vedral, V. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.517 · Cited by 3,745
Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication
Briegel, H.-J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5932 · Cited by 3,481
Quantum information and computation
Bennett, C. H., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35005001 · Cited by 3,263
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K.
- Affiliations
- IBM (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1996-11-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3824-3851
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2060887031
- Cited by
- 5,272
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 130 · 2025: 243 · 2024: 247 · 2023: 240 · 2022: 199 · 2021: 224 · 2020: 215 · 2019: 219 · 2018: 163 · 2017: 158 · 2016: 195 · 2015: 159 · 2014: 185 · 2013: 186 · 2012: 181
- FWCI
- 86.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- entanglement distillation, quantum error correction, mixed-state entanglement, Bell-diagonal states, noisy quantum channels, depolarizing channel, universal hashing, two-way classical communication, single-error-correcting codes, quantum state transfer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review