The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Open accessAbstract
Entanglement purification protocols (EPPs) and quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) provide two ways of protecting quantum states from interaction with the environment. In an EPP, perfectly entangled pure states are extracted, with some yield D, from a mixed state M shared by two parties; with a QECC, an arbitrary quantum state |\ensuremath{\xi}〉 can be transmitted at some rate Q through a noisy channel \ensuremath{\chi} without degradation. We prove that an EPP involving one-way classical communication and acting on mixed state M^(\ensuremath{\chi}) (obtained by sharing halves of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pairs through a channel \ensuremath{\chi}) yields a QECC on \ensuremath{\chi} with rate Q=D, and vice versa. We compare the amount of entanglement E(M) required to prepare a mixed state M by local actions with the amounts ${\mathit{D}}_{1}$(M) and ${\mathit{D}}_{2}$(M) that can be locally distilled from it by EPPs using one- and two-way classical communication, respectively, and give an exact expression for E(M) when M is Bell diagonal. While EPPs require classical communication, QECCs do not, and we prove Q is not increased by adding one-way classical communication. However, both D and Q can be increased by adding two-way communication. We show that certain noisy quantum channels, for example a 50% depolarizing channel, can be used for reliable transmission of quantum states if two-way communication is available, but cannot be used if only one-way communication is available. We exhibit a family of codes based on universal hashing able to achieve an asymptotic Q (or D) of 1-S for simple noise models, where S is the error entropy. We also obtain a specific, simple 5-bit single-error-correcting quantum block code. We prove that iff a QECC results in high fidelity for the case of no error then the QECC can be recast into a form where the encoder is the matrix inverse of the decoder. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This experimental method of measuring the R matrix enables us a complete determination of not only steering measures, but also a fully entangled fraction (FEF)57 and Bell nonlocality measures58.”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [57]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Non-maximally entangled states have been shown to reduce the required detector efficiencies for loophole-free tests of Bell inequalities [13]”
From Nonmaximally Entangled States: Production, Characterization, and Utilization (1999) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Any quantity that is supposed to quantify entanglement needs to be monotonously decreasing under such operations [25,41].”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [41]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703
Self-citationOn the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880 · Cited by 7,573
Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states
Bennett, C. H., & Wiesner, S. J. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2881 · Cited by 5,470
Self-citationA single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406
Self-citationSeparability Criterion for Density Matrices
Peres, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.1413 · Cited by 5,191
Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory
Shor, P. W. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r2493 · Cited by 4,479
Elementary gates for quantum computation
Barenco, A., Bennett, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J. A., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.3457 · Cited by 4,311
Self-citationQuantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
Werner, R. F. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.40.4277 · Cited by 4,062
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- C. H. Bennett, 1996, Phys. Today, 48
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 · Cited by 8,290
Self-citationQuantum information with continuous variables
Braunstein, S. L., & van Loock, P. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.513 · Cited by 3,858
Entanglement in many-body systems
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., & Vedral, V. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.517 · Cited by 3,745
Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication
Briegel, H.-J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5932 · Cited by 3,481
Quantum information and computation
Bennett, C. H., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35005001 · Cited by 3,263
Self-citationSimple Proof of Security of the BB84 Quantum Key Distribution Protocol
Shor, P. W., & Preskill, J. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.441 · Cited by 3,047
Colloquium : Area laws for the entanglement entropy
Eisert, J., Cramer, M., & Plenio, M. B. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.277 · Cited by 2,873
Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits
Hill, S., & Wootters, W. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5022 · Cited by 2,823
Self-citationCoffman, V., Kundu, J., & Wootters, W. K. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.052306 · Cited by 2,619
Self-citationGühne, O., & Tóth, G. (2009) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004 · Cited by 2,401
Ultracold atomic gases in optical lattices: mimicking condensed matter physics and beyond
Lewenstein, M., Sanpera, A., Ahufinger, V., Damski, B., Sen(De), A., & Sen, U. (2007) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018730701223200 · Cited by 2,104
Scaling of entanglement close to a quantum phase transition
Osterloh, A., Amico, L., Falci, G., & Fazio, R. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416608a · Cited by 1,860
Quantum simulations with trapped ions
Blatt, R., & Roos, C. F. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2252 · Cited by 1,629
The classical-quantum boundary for correlations: Discord and related measures
Modi, K., Brodutch, A., Cable, H., Paterek, T., & Vedral, V. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1655 · Cited by 1,600
Theory of quantum error-correcting codes
Knill, E., & Laflamme, R. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.55.900 · Cited by 1,593
Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex
Plenio, M. B. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.090503 · Cited by 1,530
Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas
Bravyi, S., & Kitaev, A. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.022316 · Cited by 1,525
Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits
Aaronson, S., & Gottesman, D. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.052328 · Cited by 1,515
Entanglement in a simple quantum phase transition
Osborne, T. J., & Nielsen, M. A. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.032110 · Cited by 1,472
Quantum computations: algorithms and error correction
Kitaev, A. Y. (1997) · Russian Mathematical Surveys · doi:10.1070/rm1997v052n06abeh002155 · Cited by 1,424
Entanglement measures and purification procedures
Vedral, V., & Plenio, M. B. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.1619 · Cited by 1,419
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410
“The main tool to overcome the noise in the quantum communication channel is entanglement purification, proposed by Bennett et al. (1996a, 1996b, 1996c) and Deutsch et al. (1996).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCleve, R., Gottesman, D., & Lo, H.-K. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.648 · Cited by 1,373
Quantum error correction for quantum memories
Terhal, B. M. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.307 · Cited by 1,354
The Theory of Quantum Information
Watrous, J. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316848142 · Cited by 1,325
Mixed-state entanglement and distillation: Is there a ‘bound’ entanglement in nature?
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.5239 · Cited by 1,208
Conditions for a class of entanglement transformations
Nielsen, M. A. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.436 · Cited by 1,036
Preskill, J. (1998) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0167 · Cited by 994
General teleportation channel, singlet fraction, and quasidistillation
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.60.1888 · Cited by 965
Theory of Quantum Error Correction for General Noise
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Viola, L. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2525 · Cited by 866
Universal state inversion and concurrence in arbitrary dimensions
Rungta, P., Bužek, V., Caves, C. M., Hillery, M., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.042315 · Cited by 848
The Private Classical Capacity and Quantum Capacity of a Quantum Channel
Devetak, I. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2004.839515 · Cited by 823
Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information
Bartlett, S. D., Rudolph, T., & Spekkens, R. W. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.555 · Cited by 827
Entanglement of single-atom quantum bits at a distance
Moehring, D. L., Maunz, P., Olmschenk, S., Younge, K. C., Matsukevich, D. N., Duan, L.-M., & Monroe, C. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06118 · Cited by 820
Quantum Error Correction and Orthogonal Geometry
Calderbank, A. R., Rains, E. M., Shor, P. W., & Sloane, N. J. A. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.405 · Cited by 811
Capacity of the noisy quantum channel
Lloyd, S. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.55.1613 · Cited by 783
Continuous Variable Quantum Information: Gaussian States and Beyond
Adesso, G., Ragy, S., & Lee, A. R. (2014) · Open Systems & Information Dynamics · doi:10.1142/s1230161214400010 · Cited by 787
General Monogamy Inequality for Bipartite Qubit Entanglement
Osborne, T. J., & Verstraete, F. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.220503 · Cited by 733
Vidal, G. (2000) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340008244048 · Cited by 821
Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states
Lu, C.-Y., Zhou, X.-Q., Gühne, O., Gao, W.-B., Zhang, J., Yuan, Z.-S., Goebel, A., Yang, T., & Pan, J.-W. (2007) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys507 · Cited by 683
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Zurek, W. H. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5349.342 · Cited by 663
Fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant error
Aharonov, D., & Ben-Or, M. (1997) · Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '97 · doi:10.1145/258533.258579 · Cited by 631
Experimental demonstration of five-photon entanglement and open-destination teleportation
Zhao, Z., Chen, Y.-A., Zhang, A.-N., Yang, T., Briegel, H. J., & Pan, J.-W. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02643 · Cited by 602
Optimal universal and state-dependent quantum cloning
Bruß, D., DiVincenzo, D. P., Ekert, A., Fuchs, C. A., Macchiavello, C., & Smolin, J. A. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.2368 · Cited by 554
Self-citationSimple quantum error-correcting codes
Steane, A. M. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.4741 · Cited by 522
Global entanglement in multiparticle systems
Meyer, D. A., & Wallach, N. R. (2002) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1497700 · Cited by 520
Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate
Aharonov, D., & Ben-Or, M. (2008) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539799359385 · Cited by 513
Nonmaximally Entangled States: Production, Characterization, and Utilization
White, A. G., James, D. F. V., Eberhard, P. H., & Kwiat, P. G. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3103 · Cited by 511
Macroscopically distinct quantum-superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping
Cochrane, P. T., Milburn, G. J., & Munro, W. J. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.2631 · Cited by 470
Characterizing quantum gates via randomized benchmarking
Magesan, E., Gambetta, J. M., & Emerson, J. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.042311 · Cited by 464
Direct Estimations of Linear and Nonlinear Functionals of a Quantum State
Ekert, A. K., Alves, C. M., Oi, D. K. L., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Kwek, L. C. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.217901 · Cited by 427
The resource theory of quantum reference frames: manipulations and monotones
Gour, G., & Spekkens, R. W. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/3/033023 · Cited by 423
Fidelity and concurrence of conjugated states
Uhlmann, A. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.62.032307 · Cited by 421
Measures and dynamics of entangled states
Mintert, F., Carvalho, A. R. R., Kuś, M., & Buchleitner, A. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.04.006 · Cited by 420
Quantum error-correcting codes associated with graphs
Schlingemann, D., & Werner, R. F. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.012308 · Cited by 406
“In the simplest case, the fivefold code [9–11] (for qubits as well as higher dimensional systems), it can be verified in a few lines that any two errors are corrected.”
BackgroundBound entanglement can be activated
Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.1056 · Cited by 399
Capacities of Quantum Erasure Channels
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., & Smolin, J. A. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.3217 · Cited by 365
Self-citationResilient quantum computation: error models and thresholds
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Zurek, W. H. (1998) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0166 · Cited by 346
Entangled Light from White Noise
Plenio, M. B., & Huelga, S. F. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.197901 · Cited by 334
Valence-bond states for quantum computation
Verstraete, F., & Cirac, J. I. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.060302 · Cited by 333
A Survey on Quantum Channel Capacities
Gyongyosi, L., Imre, S., & Nguyen, H. V. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2786748 · Cited by 337
Realization of an Error-Correcting Surface Code with Superconducting Qubits
Zhao, Y., Ye, Y., Huang, H.-L., Zhang, Y., Wu, D., Guan, H., Zhu, Q., Wei, Z., He, T., Cao, S., et al. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.030501 · Cited by 321
Quantum teleportation of an arbitrary two qubit state and its relation to multipartite entanglement
Rigolin, G. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.032303 · Cited by 315
Symmetry analyzer for nondestructive Bell-state detection using weak nonlinearities
Barrett, S. D., Kok, P., Nemoto, K., Beausoleil, R. G., Munro, W. J., & Spiller, T. P. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.060302 · Cited by 300
Quantum-channel capacity of very noisy channels
DiVincenzo, D. P., Shor, P. W., & Smolin, J. A. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.830 · Cited by 297
Self-citationMinimal universal two-qubit controlled-NOT-based circuits
Shende, V. V., Markov, I. L., & Bullock, S. S. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.062321 · Cited by 288
Classification of multiqubit mixed states: Separability and distillability properties
Dür, W., & Cirac, J. I. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.042314 · Cited by 291
Separability and Distillability of Multiparticle Quantum Systems
Dür, W., Cirac, J. I., & Tarrach, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3562 · Cited by 279
Bonilla Ataides, J. P., Tuckett, D. K., Bartlett, S. D., Flammia, S. T., & Brown, B. J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22274-1 · Cited by 262
Concurrence of mixed bipartite quantum states in arbitrary dimensions
Mintert, F., Kuś, M., & Buchleitner, A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.167902 · Cited by 246
Entanglement of formation for isotropic states
Terhal, B. M., & Vollbrecht, K. G. H. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.2625 · Cited by 254
Quantum computation vs. firewalls
Harlow, D., & Hayden, P. (2013) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2013)085 · Cited by 310
Quantum Error Correction with Imperfect Gates
Kitaev, A. Y. (1997) · Quantum Communication, Computing, and Measurement · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5923-8_19 · Cited by 214
Driving non-Gaussian to Gaussian states with linear optics
Browne, D. E., Eisert, J., Scheel, S., & Plenio, M. B. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.062320 · Cited by 191
Optimizing entropy relative to a channel or a subalgebra
Uhlmann (1998) · Open Systems & Information Dynamics · doi:10.1023/a:1009664331611 · Cited by 181
Variational characterizations of separability and entanglement of formation
Audenaert, K., Verstraete, F., & De Moor, B. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052304 · Cited by 176
Legeza, Ö., & Sólyom, J. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.205118 · Cited by 167
Extremal properties of the variance and the quantum Fisher information
Tóth, G., & Petz, D. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.032324 · Cited by 157
Exponential Error Suppression for Near-Term Quantum Devices
Koczor, B. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.031057 · Cited by 147
Universal Recovery Maps and Approximate Sufficiency of Quantum Relative Entropy
Junge, M., Renner, R., Sutter, D., Wilde, M. M., & Winter, A. (2018) · Annales Henri Poincaré · doi:10.1007/s00023-018-0716-0 · Cited by 118
Irreversibility in Asymptotic Manipulations of Entanglement
Vidal, G., & Cirac, J. I. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5803 · Cited by 110
Optimal and efficient decoding of concatenated quantum block codes
Poulin, D. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.052333 · Cited by 105
Entanglement-Assisted Quantum Turbo Codes
Wilde, M. M., Hsieh, M.-H., & Babar, Z. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2013.2292052 · Cited by 102
The Schmidt number as a universal entanglement measure
Sperling, J., & Vogel, W. (2011) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/83/04/045002 · Cited by 96
Generalization of Quantum Error Correction via the Heisenberg Picture
Bény, C., Kempf, A., & Kribs, D. W. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.100502 · Cited by 91
Entanglement, Quantum Phase Transitions, and Density Matrix Renormalization
Osborne, T. J., & Nielsen, M. A. (2002) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1023/a:1019601218492 · Cited by 95
Simple approach to approximate quantum error correction based on the transpose channel
Ng, H. K., & Mandayam, P. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.062342 · Cited by 87
A comparative study of relative entropy of entanglement, concurrence and negativity
Miranowicz, A., & Grudka, A. (2004) · Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/6/12/009 · Cited by 86
Experimental investigation of the non-Markovian dynamics of classical and quantum correlations
Xu, J.-S., Li, C.-F., Zhang, C.-J., Xu, X.-Y., Zhang, Y.-S., & Guo, G.-C. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.042328 · Cited by 74
Continuous-variable-entanglement dynamics in structured reservoirs
Vasile, R., Olivares, S., Paris, M. G. A., & Maniscalco, S. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.062324 · Cited by 67
Quantum error correction of observables
Bény, C., Kempf, A., & Kribs, D. W. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042303 · Cited by 67
Efficient error characterization in quantum information processing
Lévi, B., López, C. C., Emerson, J., & Cory, D. G. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.022314 · Cited by 65
Gate fidelity fluctuations and quantum process invariants
Magesan, E., Blume-Kohout, R., & Emerson, J. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.012309 · Cited by 60
Arbitrary two-qubit computation in 23 elementary gates
Bullock, S. S., & Markov, I. L. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.012318 · Cited by 59
Separable approximation for mixed states of composite quantum systems
Wellens, T., & Kuś, M. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052302 · Cited by 40
Approximate Quantum Error Correction Revisited: Introducing the Alpha-Bit
Hayden, P., & Penington, G. (2020) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03689-1 · Cited by 40
Variational Circuit Compiler for Quantum Error Correction
Xu, X., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.034068 · Cited by 36
Quantum information and physics: Some future directions
Preskill, J. (2000) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/095003400148097 · Cited by 154
Quantum error mitigation by Pauli check sandwiching
Gonzales, A., Shaydulin, R., Saleem, Z. H., & Suchara, M. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28109-x · Cited by 26
Quantum repeaters based on trapped ions with decoherence-free subspace encoding
Zwerger, M., Lanyon, B. P., Northup, T. E., Muschik, C. A., Dür, W., & Sangouard, N. (2017) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aa7983 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K.
- Affiliations
- IBM (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1996-11-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3824-3851
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2060887031
- Cited by
- 5,272
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 130 · 2025: 243 · 2024: 247 · 2023: 240 · 2022: 199 · 2021: 224 · 2020: 215 · 2019: 219 · 2018: 163 · 2017: 158 · 2016: 195 · 2015: 159 · 2014: 185 · 2013: 186 · 2012: 181
- FWCI
- 86.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- entanglement distillation, quantum error correction, mixed-state entanglement, Bell-diagonal states, noisy quantum channels, depolarizing channel, universal hashing, two-way classical communication, single-error-correcting codes, quantum state transfer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review