The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum computation with quantum dots
Open accessAbstract
We propose an implementation of a universal set of one- and two-quantum-bit gates for quantum computation using the spin states of coupled single-electron quantum dots. Desired operations are effected by the gating of the tunneling barrier between neighboring dots. Several measures of the gate quality are computed within a recently derived spin master equation incorporating decoherence caused by a prototypical magnetic environment. Dot-array experiments that would provide an initial demonstration of the desired nonequilibrium spin dynamics are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The array of 12 quantum dots can be operated as physical qubits in a variety of spin encodings, including single spin qubits39 (in a 12-qubit array) or exchange-only qubits40 (in a four-qubit array).”
From Probing single electrons across 300-mm spin qubit wafers (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
In the citing paper
“The spin chain then acts as an amplitude damping quantum channel [8, 9].”
From Quantum Communication through an Unmodulated Spin Chain (2003) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elementary gates for quantum computation
Barenco, A., Bennett, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J. A., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.3457 · Cited by 4,311
Self-citationQuantum Computations with Cold Trapped Ions
Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4091 · Cited by 3,733
Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods
Peres, A., & Ballentine, L. E. (1995) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.17946 · Cited by 2,561
Quantum theory of open systems
Davies, E. B. (1976) · Cited by 2,416
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.255 · Cited by 1,651
Self-citationMeasurement of Conditional Phase Shifts for Quantum Logic
Turchette, Q. A., Hood, C. J., Lange, W., Mabuchi, H., & Kimble, H. J. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4710 · Cited by 1,409
Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
(1994) · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1994 · Cited by 1,134
Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods
(2002) · doi:10.1007/0-306-47120-5 · Cited by 1,029
Conditional Quantum Dynamics and Logic Gates
Barenco, A., Deutsch, D., EKERT, A. K., & Jozsa, R. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4083 · Cited by 971
Prinz, G. A. (1995) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.881459 · Cited by 843
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- C. Monroe, 1995, Science, 4714
- N. W. Ashcroft, 1976, Solid State Physics
- L. I. Glazman, 1990, Sov. Phys. JETP, 71, 1031
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,012
Dietl, T. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-38592-4_1 · Cited by 93
Exchange coupling in silicon quantum dots: Theoretical considerations for quantum computation
Li, Q., Cywiński, Ł., Culcer, D., Hu, X., & Sarma, S. D. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.085313 · Cited by 92
Electrical Control of g-Factor in a Few-Hole Silicon Nanowire MOSFET
Voisin, B., Maurand, R., Barraud, S., Vinet, M., Jehl, X., Sanquer, M., Renard, J., & Franceschi, S. D. (2015) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02920 · Cited by 96
Fogarty, M. A., Chan, K. W., Hensen, B., Huang, W., Tanttu, T., Yang, C. H., Laucht, A., Veldhorst, M., Hudson, F. E., Itoh, K. M., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06039-x · Cited by 92
Fast two-qubit logic with holes in germanium
Hendrickx, N. W., Franke, D. P., Sammak, A., Scappucci, G., & Veldhorst, M. (2019) · TNO Repository · Cited by 115
Pharmaceutical and biomedical applications of quantum dots
Bajwa, N., Mehra, N. K., Jain, K., & Jain, N. K. (2015) · Artificial Cells Nanomedicine and Biotechnology · doi:10.3109/21691401.2015.1052468 · Cited by 94
Multipartite entangled states in coupled quantum dots and cavity QED
Wang, X., Feng, M., & Sanders, B. C. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.022302 · Cited by 91
Dreiser, J. G., Atatüre, M., Galland, C., Müller, T., Badolato, A., & İmamoğlu, A. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.075317 · Cited by 98
Kawabata, S. (2001) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.1143/jpsj.70.1210 · Cited by 90
Gate-Defined Quantum Dots on Carbon Nanotubes
Biercuk, M. J., Garaj, S., Mason, N., Chow, J. M., & Marcus, C. M. (2005) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl050364v · Cited by 92
Impact of pure dephasing on the nonlinear optical response of single quantum dots and dot ensembles
Vagov, A., Axt, V. M., & Kühn, T. (2003) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.67.115338 · Cited by 93
Dephasing due to background charge fluctuations
Itakura, T., & 都倉, 康. (2003) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.67.195320 · Cited by 91
Generic Hubbard model description of semiconductor quantum-dot spin qubits
Yang, S., Wang, X., & Sarma, S. D. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.161301 · Cited by 91
Zeeman spin splittings in semiconductor nanostructures
Kotlyar, R., Reinecke, T. L., Bayer, M., & Forchel, A. (2001) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.63.085310 · Cited by 91
Single-electron quantum dot in Si∕SiGe with integrated charge sensing
Simmons, C. B., Thalakulam, M., Shaji, N., Klein, L. J., Qin, H., Blick, R. H., Savage, D. E., Lagally, M. G., Coppersmith, S. N., & Eriksson, M. A. (2007) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.2816331 · Cited by 91
Spin States of the First Four Holes in a Silicon Nanowire Quantum Dot
Zwanenburg, F. A., van Rijmenam, C. E. W. M., Fang, Y. Z., Lieber, C. M., & Kouwenhoven, L. P. (2009) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl803440s · Cited by 91
Theory of Excitonic Spectra and Entanglement Engineering in Dot Molecules
Bester, G., Shumway, J. B., & Zunger, A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.047401 · Cited by 91
An introduction to quantum information processing: applications and realizations
Spiller, T. P., Munro, W. J., Barrett, S. D., & Kok, P. (2005) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107510500293261 · Cited by 88
Entanglement of solid-state qubits by measurement
Ruskov, R., & Korotkov, A. N. (2003) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.67.241305 · Cited by 90
Room temperature ferromagnetism in (Ga 1−x Mn x ) 2 O 3 epitaxial thin films
Guo, D., Wu, Z., An, Y., Li, X., Guo, X., Chu, X., Sun, C., Lei, M., Li, L., Cao, L., et al. (2014) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c4tc02833c · Cited by 90
Robust micromagnet design for fast electrical manipulations of single spins in quantum dots
Yoneda, J., Otsuka, T., Takakura, T., Pioro-Ladrière, M., Brunner, R., Lü, H., Nakajima, T., Obata, T., Noiri, A., Palmstrøm, C. J., et al. (2015) · Applied Physics Express · doi:10.7567/apex.8.084401 · Cited by 90
Simplified optical quantum-information processing via weak cross-Kerr nonlinearities
Guo, Q., Bai, J., Cheng, L., Shao, X., Wang, H., & Zhang, S. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.054303 · Cited by 89
Spatial adiabatic passage: a review of recent progress
Menchon-Enrich, R., Benseny, A., Ahufinger, V., Greentree, A. D., Busch, T., & Mompart, J. (2016) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/074401 · Cited by 89
Extending the coherence of a quantum dot hybrid qubit
Thorgrimsson, B., Kim, D., Yang, Y., Smith, L. W., Simmons, C. B., Ward, D. R., Foote, R. H., Corrigan, J., Savage, D. E., Lagally, M. G., et al. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0034-2 · Cited by 89
Optimized Quantum Compilation for Near-Term Algorithms with OpenPulse
Gokhale, P., Javadi-Abhari, A., Earnest, N., Shi, Y., & Chong, F. T. (2020) · IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) · doi:10.1109/micro50266.2020.00027 · Cited by 101
Bosco, S., Hetényi, B., & Loss, D. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010348 · Cited by 91
Self-citationPractical scheme for error control using feedback
Sarovar, M., Ahn, C., Jacobs, K. A., & Milburn, G. J. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.052324 · Cited by 87
Charge decoherence in laterally coupled quantum dots due to electron-phonon interactions
Stavrou, V. N., & Hu, X. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.075362 · Cited by 89
Strongly capacitively coupled quantum dots
Chan, I., Westervelt, R. M., Maranowski, K. D., & Gossard, A. C. (2002) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.1456552 · Cited by 89
Observation of the single-electron regime in a highly tunable silicon quantum dot
Lim, W. H., Zwanenburg, F. A., Huebl, H., Möttönen, M., Chan, K. W., Morello, A., & Dzurak, A. S. (2009) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3272858 · Cited by 89
Charge-State Conditional Operation of a Spin Qubit
van Weperen, I., Armstrong, B. D., Laird, E. A., Medford, J., Marcus, C. M., Hanson, M. P., & Gossard, A. C. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.030506 · Cited by 88
Wang, H., Zhu, A., Zhang, S., & Yeon, K.-H. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.062337 · Cited by 87
Lattice Surgery with a Twist: Simplifying Clifford Gates of Surface Codes
Litinski, D., & von Oppen, F. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-05-04-62 · Cited by 88
Spin decoherence and electron spin bath noise of a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond
Wang, Z., & Takahashi, S. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.115122 · Cited by 89
Single-exciton spectroscopy of semimagnetic quantum dots
Fernández-Rossier, J. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.045301 · Cited by 88
Imaging a Single-Electron Quantum Dot
Fallahi, P., Bleszynski, A. C., Westervelt, R. M., Huang, J., Walls, J. D., Heller, E. J., Hanson, M., & Gossard, A. C. (2005) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl048405v · Cited by 88
Realization of pristine and locally tunable one-dimensional electron systems in carbon nanotubes.
Waissman, J., Honig, M., Pecker, S., Benyamini, A., Hamo, A., & Ilani, S. (2013) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.143 · Cited by 72
Influence of interference effects on thermoelectric properties of double quantum dots
Wierzbicki, M., & Swirkowicz, R. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.075410 · Cited by 88
Monitoring Statistical Magnetic Fluctuations on the Nanometer Scale
Bacher, G., Максимов, А. А., Schömig, H., Kulakovskiĭ, V. D., Welsch, M. K., Forchel, A., Dorozhkin, P. S., Chernenko, A. V., Lee, S., Dobrowolska, M., et al. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.127201 · Cited by 88
Quantum control via encoded dynamical decoupling
Viola, L. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.012307 · Cited by 96
Spin injection from (Ga,Mn)As into InAs quantum dots
Chye, Y., White, M. E., Johnston‐Halperin, E., Gerardot, B. D., Awschalom, D. D., & Petroff, P. M. (2002) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.201301 · Cited by 88
Transport through graphene double dots
Molitor, F., Dröscher, S., Güttinger, J., Jacobsen, A., Stampfer, C., Ihn, T., & Ensslin, K. (2009) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3148367 · Cited by 87
Zhang, Z., Guo, K., Chen, B., Wang, R., Kang, M.-W., & Shao, S. (2010) · Superlattices and Microstructures · doi:10.1016/j.spmi.2009.12.004 · Cited by 87
Tunable Hybrid Qubit in a GaAs Double Quantum Dot
Cao, G., Li, H.-O., Yu, G., Wang, B., Chen, B.-B., Song, X., Xiao, M., Guo, G., Jiang, H. W., Hu, X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.086801 · Cited by 87
Quantifying error and leakage in an encoded Si/SiGe triple-dot qubit
Andrews, R. W., Jones, C., Reed, M. D., Jones, A. M., Ha, S. D., Jura, M. P., Kerckhoff, J., Levendorf, M., Meenehan, S., Merkel, S. T., et al. (2019) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-019-0500-4 · Cited by 89
Exploiting a Single‐Crystal Environment to Minimize the Charge Noise on Qubits in Silicon
Kranz, L., Gorman, S. K., Thorgrimsson, B., He, Y., Keith, D., Keizer, J. G., & Simmons, M. Y. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202003361 · Cited by 87
The rise of spin noise spectroscopy in semiconductors: From acoustic to GHz frequencies
Hübner, J., Berski, F., Dahbashi, R., & Oestreich, M. (2014) · physica status solidi (b) · doi:10.1002/pssb.201350291 · Cited by 89
Anantathanasarn, S., Nötzel, R., van Veldhoven, P. J., van Otten, F. W. M., Barbarin, Y., Servanton, G., Vries, T. D., Smalbrugge, E., Geluk, E. J., Eijkemans, T. J., et al. (2006) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.2336077 · Cited by 87
Gate-controlled electron spin resonance in GaAs/AlxGa1−xAs heterostructures
Jiang, H. W., & Yablonovitch, E. (2001) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.64.041307 · Cited by 87
Quantum measurement of a mesoscopic spin ensemble
Giedke, G., Taylor, J. M., D’Alessandro, D., Lukin, M. D., & İmamoğlu, A. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.032316 · Cited by 92
Zero-field spin splitting in InAs-AlSb quantum wells revisited
Brosig, S., Ensslin, K., Warburton, R. J., Nguyen, C., Brar, B., Thomas, M., & Kroemer, H. (1999) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.60.r13989 · Cited by 87
Scheibner, R., Novik, E. G., Borzenko, T., Koenig, M., Reuter, D., Wieck, A. D., Buhmann, H., & Molenkamp, L. W. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.041301 · Cited by 86
Scalable photonic quantum computing assisted by quantum-dot spin in double-sided optical microcavity
Wei, H., & Deng, F. (2013) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.21.017671 · Cited by 86
Logical Qubit in a Linear Array of Semiconductor Quantum Dots
Jones, C., Fogarty, M. A., Morello, A., Gyure, M. F., Dzurak, A. S., & Ladd, T. D. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021058 · Cited by 95
Cai, T., Kim, J.-H., Yang, Z., Dutta, S., Aghaeimeibodi, S., & Waks, E. (2018) · ACS Photonics · doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00580 · Cited by 85
Quantized Conductance through a Spin-Selective Atomic Point Contact
Lebrat, M., Häusler, S., Fabritius, P., Husmann, D., Corman, L., & Esslinger, T. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.193605 · Cited by 85
Optimal operation points for ultrafast, highly coherent Ge hole spin-orbit qubits
Wang, Z., Marcellina, E., Hamilton, A. R., Cullen, J. H., Rogge, S. M. J., Salfi, J., & Culcer, D. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00386-2 · Cited by 86
Modelling decoherence in quantum spin systems
Zhang, W., Konstantinidis, N. P., Al-Hassanieh, K. A., & Dobrovitski, V. V. (2007) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/19/8/083202 · Cited by 87
Driven spin systems as quantum thermodynamic machines: Fundamental limits
Henrich, M. J., Günter Mahler, A., & Mathias Michel, A. (2007) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.75.051118 · Cited by 86
Direct control of the tunnel splitting in a one-electron double quantum dot
Hüttel, A. K., Ludwig, S., Lorenz, H., Eberl, K., & Kotthaus, J. P. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.081310 · Cited by 86
Schinner, G. J., Repp, J., Schubert, E., Rai, A. K., Reuter, D., Wieck, A. D., Govorov, A. O., Holleitner, A. W., & Kotthaus, J. P. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.127403 · Cited by 87
Comparison of low frequency charge noise in identically patterned Si/SiO2 and Si/SiGe quantum dots
Freeman, B. M., Schoenfield, J. S., & Jiang, H. W. (2016) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.4954700 · Cited by 86
Efficient electron spin manipulation in a quantum well by an in-plane electric field
RASHBA, E. I., & Efros, A. L. (2003) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.1635987 · Cited by 86
Recent progresses of quantum confinement in graphene quantum dots
Li, S., & He, L. (2021) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.1007/s11467-021-1125-2 · Cited by 86
Operating semiconductor quantum processors with hopping spins
Wang, C.-A., John, V., Tidjani, H., Yu, C. X., Ivlev, A., Déprez, C., van Riggelen, F., Woods, B. D., Hendrickx, N. W., Lawrie, W. I. L., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ado5915 · Cited by 85
Spin-orbit effects in single-electron states in coupled quantum dots
Stano, P., & Fabian, J. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.155410 · Cited by 85
Double Quantum Dot as a Quantum Bit
Divincenzo, D. P. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1118921 · Cited by 85
Self-citationEfficient Multiqubit Entanglement via a Spin Bus
Friesen, M. G., Biswas, A., Hu, X., & Lidar, D. A. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.230503 · Cited by 84
Anisotropic Spin Exchange in Pulsed Quantum Gates
Bonesteel, N. E., Stepanenko, D., & Divincenzo, D. P. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.207901 · Cited by 85
Self-citationCoherent long-distance displacement of individual electron spins
Flentje, H., Mortemousque, P.-A., Thalineau, R., Ludwig, A., Wieck, A. D., Bäuerle, C., & Meunier, T. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00534-3 · Cited by 85
High-Resolution Valley Spectroscopy of Si Quantum Dots
Mi, X., Péterfalvi, C. G., Burkard, G., & Petta, J. R. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.176803 · Cited by 83
Charge Relaxation in a Single-Electron Si/SiGe Double Quantum Dot
Wang, K., Payette, C., Dovzhenko, Y., Deelman, P. W., & Petta, J. R. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.046801 · Cited by 84
Coherent spin-exchange via a quantum mediator
Baart, T. A., Fujita, T., Reichl, C., Wegscheider, W., & Vandersypen, L. M. K. (2016) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.188 · Cited by 83
Spin-orbit interactions in inversion-asymmetric two-dimensional hole systems: A variational analysis
Marcellina, E., Hamilton, A. R., Winkler, R., & Culcer, D. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.075305 · Cited by 88
Quantum simulation of the Abelian-Higgs lattice gauge theory with ultracold atoms
González-Cuadra, D., Zohar, E., & Cirac, J. I. (2017) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa6f37 · Cited by 81
Radio-Frequency-Detected Fast Charge Sensing in Undoped Silicon Quantum Dots
Noiri, A., Takeda, K., Yoneda, J., Nakajima, T., Kodera, T., & Tarucha, S. (2020) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03847 · Cited by 84
Coherent superposition of photon- and phonon-assisted tunneling in coupled quantum dots
Qin, H., Holleitner, A. W., Eberl, K., & Blick, R. H. (2001) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.64.241302 · Cited by 84
Spin spectroscopy of dark excitons in CdSe quantum dots to 60 T
Johnston‐Halperin, E., Awschalom, D. D., Crooker, S. A., Éfros, A. L., Rosen, M., Peng, X., & Alivisatos, A. P. (2001) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.63.205309 · Cited by 88
Global control and fast solid-state donor electron spin quantum computing
Hill, C. D., Hollenberg, L. C. L., Fowler, A. G., Wellard, C. J., Greentree, A. D., & Goan, H. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.045350 · Cited by 84
Spin fine structure of optically excited quantum dot molecules
Scheibner, M., Doty, M. F., Ponomarev, I. V., Bracker, A. S., Stinaff, E., Коренев, В. Л., Reinecke, T. L., & Gammon, D. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.245318 · Cited by 84
Dupont-Ferrier, E., Roche, B., Voisin, B., Jehl, X., Wacquez, R., Vinet, M., Sanquer, M., & Franceschi, S. D. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.136802 · Cited by 84
Spectrum of the Nuclear Environment for GaAs Spin Qubits
Malinowski, F. K., Martins, F., Cywiński, Ł., Rudner, M. S., Nissen, P. D., Fallahi, S., Gardner, G. C., Manfra, M. J., Marcus, C. M., & Kuemmeth, F. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.177702 · Cited by 84
Gate-tunable quantum dot in a high quality single layer MoS2 van der Waals heterostructure
Pisoni, R., Lei, Z., Back, P., Eich, M., Overweg, H., Lee, Y., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Ihn, T., & Ensslin, K. (2018) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.5021113 · Cited by 84
Spin-orbit coupling and intrinsic spin mixing in quantum dots
Destefani, C. F., Ulloa, S. E., & Marques, G. E. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.125302 · Cited by 84
Spin-based quantum computation in multielectron quantum dots
Hu, X., & Sarma, S. D. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.042312 · Cited by 86
Nonlinear Optical Properties of CdSe and CdTe Core-Shell Quantum Dots and Their Applications
Kalsoom, U. E., Yi, R., Qu, J., & Liu, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2021.612070 · Cited by 83
Spin Coherence of Holes in GaAs/(Al,Ga)As Quantum Wells
Syperek, M., Yakovlev, D. R., Greilich, A., Misiewicz, J., Bayer, M., Reuter, D., & Wieck, A. D. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.187401 · Cited by 83
Biexcitons in coupled quantum dots as a source of entangled photons
Gywat, O., Burkard, G., & Loss, D. (2002) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.205329 · Cited by 83
Self-citationQuantum Interferences in Cooperative Dicke Emission from Spatial Variation of the Laser Phase
Das, S., Agarwal, G. S., & Scully, M. O. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.153601 · Cited by 83
Hyperfine interaction induced decoherence of electron spins in quantum dots
Zhang, W., Dobrovitski, V. V., Al-Hassanieh, K. A., Dagotto, E. R., & Harmon, B. N. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.205313 · Cited by 83
Measuring the decoherence rate in a semiconductor charge qubit
Barrett, S. D., & Milburn, G. J. (2003) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.68.155307 · Cited by 83
Froning, F. N. M., Rančić, M. J., Hetényi, B., Bosco, S., Rehmann, M. K., Li, A., Bakkers, E. P. A. M., Zwanenburg, F. A., Loss, D., Zumbühl, D. M., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.013081 · Cited by 85
Self-citationThree-dimensional transport diagram of a triple quantum dot
Granger, G., Gaudreau, L., Kam, A., Pioro-Ladrière, M., Studenikin, S., Wasilewski, Z. R., Zawadzki, P., & Sachrajda, A. S. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.075304 · Cited by 82
Femtosecond few-fermion dynamics and deterministic single-photon gain in a quantum dot
Sotier, F., Thomay, T. O., Hanke, T., Korger, J., Mahapatra, S., Frey, A., Brunner, K. H., Bratschitsch, R., & Leitenstorfer, A. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1229 · Cited by 84
Top-gate defined double quantum dots in InAs nanowires
Pfund, A., Shorubalko, I., Leturcq, R., & Ensslin, K. (2006) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.2409625 · Cited by 82
Exact dynamics of a two-qubit system in a spin star environment
Hamdouni, Y., Fannes, M., & Petruccione, F. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.245323 · Cited by 82
Signatures of Quantum Behavior in Single-Qubit Weak Measurements
Ruskov, R., Korotkov, A. N., & Mizel, A. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.200404 · Cited by 80
Evolution of localized electron spin in a nuclear spin environment
Erlingsson, S. I., & Nazarov, Y. V. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.205327 · Cited by 83
Electron spin operation by electric fields: spin dynamics and spin injection
RASHBA, E. I. (2003) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/j.physe.2003.08.002 · Cited by 82
Probing level renormalization by sequential transport through double quantum dots
Wünsch, B., Braun, M., König, J., & Pfannkuche, D. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.205319 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Loss, D., & DiVincenzo, D. P.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- IBM (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-126
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2103282498
- Cited by
- 6,840
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 166 · 2025: 239 · 2024: 202 · 2023: 250 · 2022: 225 · 2021: 256 · 2020: 244 · 2019: 266 · 2018: 259 · 2017: 225 · 2016: 242 · 2015: 233 · 2014: 252 · 2013: 282 · 2012: 278
- FWCI
- 66.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (9407194)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- quantum dots, quantum computing, single-electron quantum dots, spin qubits, quantum gates, decoherence, magnetic environment, nonequilibrium spin dynamics, double quantum dot
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
