The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum computation with quantum dots
Open accessAbstract
We propose an implementation of a universal set of one- and two-quantum-bit gates for quantum computation using the spin states of coupled single-electron quantum dots. Desired operations are effected by the gating of the tunneling barrier between neighboring dots. Several measures of the gate quality are computed within a recently derived spin master equation incorporating decoherence caused by a prototypical magnetic environment. Dot-array experiments that would provide an initial demonstration of the desired nonequilibrium spin dynamics are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The array of 12 quantum dots can be operated as physical qubits in a variety of spin encodings, including single spin qubits39 (in a 12-qubit array) or exchange-only qubits40 (in a four-qubit array).”
From Probing single electrons across 300-mm spin qubit wafers (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
In the citing paper
“The spin chain then acts as an amplitude damping quantum channel [8, 9].”
From Quantum Communication through an Unmodulated Spin Chain (2003) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elementary gates for quantum computation
Barenco, A., Bennett, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J. A., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.3457 · Cited by 4,311
Self-citationQuantum Computations with Cold Trapped Ions
Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4091 · Cited by 3,733
Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods
Peres, A., & Ballentine, L. E. (1995) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.17946 · Cited by 2,561
Quantum theory of open systems
Davies, E. B. (1976) · Cited by 2,416
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.255 · Cited by 1,651
Self-citationMeasurement of Conditional Phase Shifts for Quantum Logic
Turchette, Q. A., Hood, C. J., Lange, W., Mabuchi, H., & Kimble, H. J. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4710 · Cited by 1,409
Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
(1994) · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1994 · Cited by 1,134
Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods
(2002) · doi:10.1007/0-306-47120-5 · Cited by 1,029
Conditional Quantum Dynamics and Logic Gates
Barenco, A., Deutsch, D., EKERT, A. K., & Jozsa, R. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4083 · Cited by 971
Prinz, G. A. (1995) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.881459 · Cited by 843
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- C. Monroe, 1995, Science, 4714
- N. W. Ashcroft, 1976, Solid State Physics
- L. I. Glazman, 1990, Sov. Phys. JETP, 71, 1031
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,012
Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity
Kimmel, S., Lin, C. Y.-Y., Low, G. H., Ozols, M., & Yoder, T. J. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0013-7 · Cited by 85
Fast Spin Rotations by Optically Controlled Geometric Phases in a Charge-Tunable InAs Quantum Dot
Kim, E. D., Truex, K., Xu, X., Sun, B., Steel, D. G., Bracker, A. S., Gammon, D., & Sham, L. J. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.167401 · Cited by 84
Liu, G., Guo, K., & Wang, C. (2012) · Physica B Condensed Matter · doi:10.1016/j.physb.2012.03.030 · Cited by 81
Symmetry-adapted variational quantum eigensolver
Seki, K., Shirakawa, T., & Yunoki, S. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.052340 · Cited by 86
Relaxation of excited spin, orbital, and valley qubit states in ideal silicon quantum dots
Tahan, C., & Joynt, R. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.075302 · Cited by 85
Universal Quantum Computation through Control of Spin-Orbit Coupling
Stepanenko, D., & Bonesteel, N. E. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.140501 · Cited by 81
Ramsey, C., del Barco, E., Hill, S., Shah, S. J., Beedle, C. C., & Hendrickson, D. N. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys886 · Cited by 80
The seminal literature of nanotechnology research
Kostoff, R. N., Murday, J. S., Lau, C. G. Y., & Tolles, W. M. (2006) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-005-9034-9 · Cited by 80
Exponential decay in a spin bath
Coish, W. A., Fischer, J., & Loss, D. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.125329 · Cited by 81
Self-citationCarrier-induced spin splitting of an individual magnetic atom embedded in a quantum dot
Besombes, L., Léger, Y., Maingault, L., Ferrand, D., Mariette, H., & Cibert, J. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.161307 · Cited by 81
Decoherence dynamics of a single spin versus spin ensemble
Dobrovitski, V. V., Feiguin, A. E., Awschalom, D. D., & Hanson, R. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.245212 · Cited by 89
Prospects for quantum computing with an array of ultracold polar paramagnetic molecules
Karra, M., Sharma, K., Friedrich, B., Kais, S., & Herschbach, D. R. (2016) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4942928 · Cited by 78
Fujisawa, T., & Hirayama, Y. (2000) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.127038 · Cited by 81
Quantum logic gates using Stark-shifted Raman transitions in a cavity
Biswas, A., & Agarwal, G. S. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.062306 · Cited by 80
Electric-dipole-induced spin resonance in disordered semiconductors
Duckheim, M., & Loss, D. (2006) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys238 · Cited by 81
Self-citationOptimized cavity-mediated dispersive two-qubit gates between spin qubits
Benito, M., Petta, J. R., & Burkard, G. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.081412 · Cited by 84
Spintronics and spintronics materials
Иванов, В. А., Aminov, T. G., Novotortsev, V. M., & Калинников, В. Т. (2004) · Russian Chemical Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s11172-005-0135-5 · Cited by 80
Two-Photon Coherent Control of a Single Quantum Dot
Flissikowski, T., Betke, A., Akimov, I. A., & Henneberger, F. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.227401 · Cited by 80
Reexamination of some spintronic field-effect device concepts
Bandyopadhyay, S., & Cahay, M. M. (2004) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.1784042 · Cited by 80
Quantum Computing Without Local Control of Qubit-Qubit Interactions
Benjamin, S. C. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.017904 · Cited by 80
Tunable phonon-induced steady-state coherence in a double-quantum-dot charge qubit
Purkayastha, A., Guarnieri, G., Mitchison, M. T., Filip, R., & Goold, J. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-0256-6 · Cited by 77
Quantum Manipulation of Two-Electron Spin States in Isolated Double Quantum Dots
Bertrand, B., Flentje, H., Takada, S., Yamamoto, M., Tarucha, S., Ludwig, A., Wieck, A. D., Bäuerle, C., & Meunier, T. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.096801 · Cited by 79
Strong Coupling of Spin Qubits to a Transmission Line Resonator
Jin, P.-Q., Marthaler, M., Shnirman, A., & Schön, G. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.190506 · Cited by 77
Quantum information on chicken wire
Fal’ko, V. I. (2007) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys556 · Cited by 79
Efficient Biexciton Emission in Elongated CdSe/ZnS Nanocrystals
Louyer, Y., Biadala, L., Trebbia, J.-B., Fernée, M. J., Tamarat, P., & Lounis, B. (2011) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl202506c · Cited by 81
Spin relaxation in a generic two-dimensional spin-orbit coupled system
Stanescu, T. D., & Galitski, V. M. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.125307 · Cited by 79
Size Dependence of Negative Trion Auger Recombination in Photodoped CdSe Nanocrystals
Cohn, A. W., Rinehart, J. D., Schimpf, A. M., Weaver, A. L., & Gamelin, D. R. (2013) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl4041675 · Cited by 79
Resonant electron transfer between quantum dots
Openov, L. А. (1999) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.60.8798 · Cited by 78
Theoretical perspectives on spintronics and spin-polarized transport
Sarma, S. D., Fabian, J., Hu, X., & Zutic, I. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · doi:10.1109/20.908600 · Cited by 78
Quantum information processing in continuous time
Childs, A. M., & Farhi, E. (2004) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 92
Estimation of many-body quantum Hamiltonians via compressive sensing
Shabani, A., Mohseni, M., Lloyd, S., Kosut, R. L., & Rabitz, H. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.012107 · Cited by 78
An elementary review on basic principles and developments of qubits for quantum computing
Chae, E., Choi, J., & Kim, J. (2024) · Nano Convergence · doi:10.1186/s40580-024-00418-5 · Cited by 101
Entanglement observables and witnesses for interacting quantum spin systems
Wu, L.-A., Bandyopadhyay, S., Sarandy, M. S., & Lidar, D. A. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.032309 · Cited by 78
Strain effects on silicon donor exchange: Quantum computer architecture considerations
Koiller, B., Hu, X., & Sarma, S. D. (2002) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.115201 · Cited by 78
Mani, R. G., Hankinson, J., Berger, C., & de Heer, W. A. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1986 · Cited by 78
Measuring the Complex Admittance of a Carbon Nanotube Double Quantum Dot
Chorley, S. J., Wabnig, J., Penfold-Fitch, Z. V., Petersson, K. D., Frake, J., Smith, C. G., & Buitelaar, M. R. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.036802 · Cited by 78
Magnetic properties of parabolic quantum dots in the presence of the spin–orbit interaction
Voskoboynikov, O., Bauga, O., Lee, C. P., & Tretyak, O. V. (2003) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1614426 · Cited by 78
Spin relaxation at the singlet-triplet crossing in a quantum dot
Golovach, V. N., Khaetskii, A. V., & Loss, D. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.045328 · Cited by 78
Self-citationState-dependent, addressable subwavelength lattices with cold atoms
Yi, W., Daley, A. J., Pupillo, G., & Zoller, P. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/7/073015 · Cited by 78
Kondo Memory in Driven Strongly Correlated Quantum Dots
Zheng, X. H., Yan, Y., & Ventra, M. D. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.086601 · Cited by 78
Thermodynamic theory of growth of nanostructures
Li, X., Wang, C. X., & Yang, G. (2014) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.03.002 · Cited by 78
High-Fidelity Single-Shot Readout for a Spin Qubit via an Enhanced Latching Mechanism
Harvey-Collard, P., D’Anjou, B., Rudolph, M., Jacobson, N. T., Dominguez, J., Eyck, G. A. T., Wendt, J. R., Pluym, T., Lilly, M. P., Coish, W. A., et al. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021046 · Cited by 78
Autotuning of Double-Dot Devices In Situ with Machine Learning
Zwolak, J. P., McJunkin, T., Kalantre, S. S., Dodson, J. P., MacQuarrie, E. R., Savage, D. E., Lagally, M. G., Coppersmith, S. N., Eriksson, M. A., & Taylor, J. M. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.13.034075 · Cited by 78
Fidelity and Leakage of Josephson Qubits
Fazio, R., Palma, G. M., & Siewert, J. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.5385 · Cited by 79
Thiele, S., Vincent, R., Holzmann, M., Klyatskaya, S. V., Ruben, M., Balestro, F., & Wernsdorfer, W. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.037203 · Cited by 82
Cavity enhanced spin measurement of the ground state spin of an NV center in diamond
Young, A. B., Hu, C. Y., Marseglia, L., Harrison, J. P., O’Brien, J. L., & Rarity, J. (2009) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/1/013007 · Cited by 76
Cavity QED with hybrid nanocircuits: from atomic-like physics to condensed matter phenomena
Cottet, A., Dartiailh, M., Desjardins, M. M., Cubaynes, T., Contamin, L. C., Delbecq, M. R., Viennot, J. J., Bruhat, L. E., Douçot, B., & Kontos, T. (2017) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa7b4d · Cited by 83
Atomic fluctuations lifting the energy degeneracy in Si/SiGe quantum dots
Wuetz, B. P., Losert, M. P., Koelling, S., Stehouwer, L. E. A., Zwerver, A.-M., Philips, S. G. J., Mądzik, M. T., Xue, X., Zheng, G., Lodari, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35458-0 · Cited by 77
Quantum dot spin qubits in silicon: Multivalley physics
Culcer, D., Cywiński, Ł., Li, Q., Hu, X., & Sarma, S. D. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.155312 · Cited by 77
Precise engineering of quantum dot array coupling through their barrier widths
Piquero‐Zulaica, I., Lobo‐Checa, J., Sadeghi, A., El‐Fattah, Z. M. A., Mitsui, C., Okamoto, T., Pawlak, R., Meier, T., Arnau, A., Ortega, J. E., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00872-2 · Cited by 76
Quantum logic and entanglement by neutral Rydberg atoms: methods and fidelity
Shi, X. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac18b8 · Cited by 81
Properties and applications of quantum dots derived from two-dimensional materials
Abdelsalam, H., & Zhang, Q. (2022) · Advances in Physics X · doi:10.1080/23746149.2022.2048966 · Cited by 77
Zhu, J., Li, Y., Lin, X., Han, Y., & Wu, K. (2024) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-024-01922-z · Cited by 84
Intervalley coupling for interface-bound electrons in silicon: An effective mass study
Saraiva, A., Calderón, M. J., Capaz, R. B., Hu, X., Sarma, S. D., & Koiller, B. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.155320 · Cited by 76
Nuclear State Preparation via Landau-Zener-Stückelberg Transitions in Double Quantum Dots
Ribeiro, H., & Burkard, G. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.216802 · Cited by 76
Single to quadruple quantum dots with tunable tunnel couplings
Takakura, T., Noiri, A., Obata, T., Otsuka, T., Yoneda, J., Yoshida, K., & Tarucha, S. (2014) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.4869108 · Cited by 75
Nuclear Spin Isomers: Engineering a Et4N[DyPc2] Spin Qudit
Pineda, E. M., Damjanović, M., Fuhr, O., Wernsdorfer, W., & Ruben, M. (2017) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201706181 · Cited by 75
Quantum non-demolition measurement of an electron spin qubit
Nakajima, T., Noiri, A., Yoneda, J., Delbecq, M. R., Stano, P., Otsuka, T., Takeda, K., Amaha, S., Allison, G., Kawasaki, K., et al. (2019) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-019-0426-x · Cited by 75
Self-citationResonantly Driven Singlet-Triplet Spin Qubit in Silicon
Takeda, K., Noiri, A., Yoneda, J., Nakajima, T., & Tarucha, S. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.117701 · Cited by 77
Electron–Hole Crossover in Gate-Controlled Bilayer Graphene Quantum Dots
Banszerus, L., Rothstein, A., Fabian, T. Z., Möller, S., Icking, E., Trellenkamp, S., Lentz, F., Neumaier, D., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., et al. (2020) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03227 · Cited by 75
Lin, X., Han, Y., Zhu, J., & Wu, K. (2022) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-022-01279-x · Cited by 77
Optical analogue structures to mesoscopic devices
Dragoman, D., & Dragoman, M. (1999) · Progress in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1016/s0079-6727(99)00007-5 · Cited by 75
Detection of optical trapping of CdTe quantum dots by two-photon-induced luminescence
Pan, L., Ishikawa, A., & Tamai, N. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.161305 · Cited by 75
Non-Markovian qubit dynamics in the presence of 1/f noise
Burkard, G. (2009) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.125317 · Cited by 75
Spin-state mixing in InAs double quantum dots
Pfund, A., Shorubalko, I., Ensslin, K., & Leturcq, R. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.161308 · Cited by 75
Liu, G., Pang, H., Yao, Y., & Yao, W. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/105011 · Cited by 75
Sørensen, E. S., Chang, M.-S., Laflorencie, N., & Affleck, I. K. (2007) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2007/08/p08003 · Cited by 77
Effect of Exchange Interaction on Spin Dephasing in a Double Quantum Dot
Laird, E. A., Petta, J. R., Johnson, A. C., Marcus, C. M., Yacoby, A., Hanson, M. P., & Gossard, A. C. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.056801 · Cited by 75
Wave Packets Can Factorize Numbers
Mack, H., Bienert, M., Haug, F., Freyberger, M., & Schleich, W. P. (2002) · physica status solidi (b) · doi:10.1002/1521-3951(200210)233:3 · Cited by 21
Quantum computing and single-qubit measurements using the spin-filter effect (invited)
Divincenzo, D. P. (1999) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.370481 · Cited by 76
Self-citationLattice Surgery with a Twist: Simplifying Clifford Gates of Surface Codes
Litinski, D., & von Oppen, F. (2018) · Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) · doi:10.17169/refubium-70 · Cited by 74
Size-tunable Lateral Confinement in Monolayer Semiconductors
Wei, G., Czaplewski, D. A., Lenferink, E. J., Stanev, T. K., Jung, I. W., & Stern, N. P. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03594-z · Cited by 74
Entanglement of polar symmetric top molecules as candidate qubits
Wei, Q., Kais, S., Friedrich, B., & Herschbach, D. R. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3649949 · Cited by 74
Dangling-bond charge qubit on a silicon surface
Livadaru, L., Xue, P., Shaterzadeh‐Yazdi, Z., DiLabio, G. A., Mutus, J., Pitters, J., Sanders, B. C., & Wolkow, R. A. (2010) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083018 · Cited by 74
Spin quantum computation in silicon nanostructures
Sarma, S. D., de Sousa, R., Hu, X., & Koiller, B. (2005) · Solid State Communications · doi:10.1016/j.ssc.2004.12.037 · Cited by 74
Carbon nanotubes for coherent spintronics
Kuemmeth, F., Churchill, H., Herring, P. K., & Marcus, C. M. (2010) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(10)70030-4 · Cited by 74
Nuclear magnetic resonance for quantum computing: Techniques and recent achievements
Xin, T., Wang, B.-X., Li, K., Kong, X., Wei, S.-J., Wang, T., Ruan, D., & Long, G. (2018) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/27/2/020308 · Cited by 75
Spin susceptibilities, spin densities, and their connection to spin currents
Erlingsson, S. I., Schliemann, J., & Loss, D. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.035319 · Cited by 75
Self-citationBroken symmetry and quantum entanglement of an exciton in InxGa1−xAs∕GaAs quantum dot molecules
Bester, G., Zunger, A., & Shumway, J. B. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.075325 · Cited by 73
Flat-band ferromagnetism in quantum dot superlattices
Tamura, H., Shiraishi, K., Kimura, T., & Takayanagi, H. (2002) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.085324 · Cited by 74
Spintronics: a new paradigm for electronics for the new millennium
Wolf, S. A., & Treger, D. M. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · doi:10.1109/20.908580 · Cited by 75
Erratum: Embryonic lethality in mice homozygous for a processing-deficient allele of Notch1
Huppert, S. S., Le, A., Schroeter, E. H., Mumm, J. S., Saxena, M. T., Milner, L. A., & Kopan, R. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35046136 · Cited by 74
A 2 × 2 quantum dot array with controllable inter-dot tunnel couplings
Mukhopadhyay, U., Dehollain, J. P., Reichl, C., Wegscheider, W., & Vandersypen, L. M. K. (2018) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.5025928 · Cited by 73
Thermal correlations and entropic uncertainty in a two-spin system under DM and KSEA interactions
Khedif, Y., Haddadi, S., Pourkarimi, M. R., & Mohammed Daoud, A. (2021) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732321502096 · Cited by 73
Sweet-spot operation of a germanium hole spin qubit with highly anisotropic noise sensitivity
Hendrickx, N. W., Massai, L., Mergenthaler, M., Schupp, F. J., Paredes, S., Bedell, S. W., Salis, G., & Fuhrer, A. (2024) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-024-01857-5 · Cited by 101
Relaxation of Hole Spins in Quantum Dots via Two-Phonon Processes
Trif, M., Simon, P., & Loss, D. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.106601 · Cited by 75
Self-citationReduced Decoherence in Large Quantum Registers
Krojanski, H. G., & Suter, D. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.150503 · Cited by 69
Two-electron spin correlations in precision placed donors in silicon
Broome, M. A., Gorman, S. K., House, M. G., Hile, S. J., Keizer, J. G., Keith, D., Hill, C. D., Watson, T. F., Baker, W., Hollenberg, L. C. L., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-02982-x · Cited by 71
Quantum Algorithm Design: Techniques and Applications
Shao, C., Yang, L., & Li, H. (2019) · Journal of Systems Science and Complexity · doi:10.1007/s11424-019-9008-0 · Cited by 74
Synthetic Hilbert Space Engineering of Molecular Qudits: Isotopologue Chemistry
Wernsdorfer, W., & Ruben, M. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201806687 · Cited by 73
Individual charge traps in silicon nanowires
Hofheinz, M., Jehl, X., Sanquer, M., Molas, G., Vinet, M., & Deleonibus, S. (2006) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2006-00452-x · Cited by 73
Quantum teleportation via a two-qubit HeisenbergXYchain—effects of anisotropy and magnetic field
Yeo, Y., Liu, T., Lu, Y.-E., & Yang, Q.-Z. (2005) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/14/012 · Cited by 74
Symmetry of anisotropic exchange interactions in semiconductor nanostructures
Kavokin, K. V. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.075302 · Cited by 73
Coulomb interaction effects in spin-polarized transport
D’Amico, I., & Vignale, G. (2002) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.085109 · Cited by 73
Molecular routes for spin cluster qubits
Affronte, M., Troiani, F., Ghirri, A., Carretta, S., Santini, P. M., Corradini, V., Schuecker, R., Muryn, C. A., Timco, G. A., & Winpenny, R. E. P. (2006) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/b515731e · Cited by 73
Application of split-gate structures as tunable spin filters
Gilbert, M. J., & Bird, F. (2000) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.1288816 · Cited by 73
Observation of excited states in a graphene double quantum dot
Molitor, F., Knowles, H. S., Dröscher, S., Gasser, U., Choi, T., Roulleau, P., Güttinger, J., Jacobsen, A., Stampfer, C., Ensslin, K., et al. (2010) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/89/67005 · Cited by 72
Spin decoherence of magnetic atoms on surfaces
Delgado, F. S., & Fernández-Rossier, J. (2017) · Progress in Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.progsurf.2016.12.001 · Cited by 70
Chen, G., Lichtenberger, H., Bauer, G. E., Jantsch, W., & Schaffler, F. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.035302 · Cited by 72
Deterministic quantum logic with photons via optically induced photonic band gaps
Friedler, I., Kurizki, G., & Petrosyan, D. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.023803 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Loss, D., & DiVincenzo, D. P.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- IBM (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-126
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2103282498
- Cited by
- 6,840
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 166 · 2025: 239 · 2024: 202 · 2023: 250 · 2022: 225 · 2021: 256 · 2020: 244 · 2019: 266 · 2018: 259 · 2017: 225 · 2016: 242 · 2015: 233 · 2014: 252 · 2013: 282 · 2012: 278
- FWCI
- 66.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (9407194)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- quantum dots, quantum computing, single-electron quantum dots, spin qubits, quantum gates, decoherence, magnetic environment, nonequilibrium spin dynamics, double quantum dot
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
