Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 425

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Weak antilocalization and spin precession in quantum wells

Open access
Knap, W., Skierbiszewski, C., Zduniak, A., Litwin-Staszewska, E., Bertho, D., Kobbi, F., Robert, J. L., Pikus, G. E., Pikus, F. G., Iordanskii, S. V., Mosser, V., Zekentes, K., Lyanda-Geller, Yu. B.·1996·Physical Review B

Abstract

The results of magnetoconductivity measurements in ${\mathrm{Ga}}_{\mathit{x}}$${\mathrm{In}}_{1\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}\mathit{x}}$As quantum wells are presented. The observed magnetoconductivity appears due to the quantum interference, which lead to the weak localization effect. It is established that the details of the weak localization are controlled by the spin splitting of electron spectra. A theory is developed that takes into account both linear and cubic in electron wave-vector terms in spin splitting, which arise due to the lack of inversion center in the crystal, as well as the linear terms that appear when the well itself is asymmetric. It is established that, unlike spin-relaxation rate, contributions of different terms into magnetoconductivity are not additive. It is demonstrated that in the interval of electron densities under investigation [(0.98-1.85)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{12}$ ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}2}$ ] all three contributions are comparable and have to be taken into account to achieve a good agreement between the theory and experiment. The results obtained from comparison of the experiment and the theory have allowed us to determine what mechanisms dominate the spin-relaxation in quantum wells and to improve the accuracy of determination of spin-splitting parameters in ${\mathit{A}}_{3}$${\mathit{B}}_{5}$ crystals and two-dimensional structures. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.53.3912

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 425

Metadata

Authors
Knap, W., Skierbiszewski, C., Zduniak, A., Litwin-Staszewska, E., Bertho, D., Kobbi, F., Robert, J. L., Pikus, G. E., Pikus, F. G., Iordanskii, S. V., Mosser, V., Zekentes, K., & Lyanda-Geller, Y. B.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1996-02-15
Volume
53
Issue
7
Pages
3912-3924
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2005375793
Cited by
425
References
17
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weak antilocalization and spin precession in quantum wells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.53.3912
The paper
Knap, W., Skierbiszewski, C., Zduniak, A., Litwin-Staszewska, E., Bertho, D., Kobbi, F., Robert, J. L., Pikus, G. E., Pikus, F. G., Iordanskii, S. V., Mosser, V., Zekentes, K., & Lyanda-Geller, Y. B. (1996). Weak antilocalization and spin precession in quantum wells. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.53.3912

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.