Cited by 61Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Threshold configurations in the presence of Lorentz violating dispersion relations

Open access
Mattingly, D., Jacobson, Ted, Liberati, S.·2003·Physical Review D

Abstract

A general characterization of lower and upper threshold configurations for two particle reactions is determined under the assumptions that the single particle dispersion relations $E(|\mathbf{p}|)$ are rotationally invariant and monotonic in $|\mathbf{p}|,$ and that energy and momentum are conserved and additive for multiple particles. It is found that at a threshold the final particle momenta are always parallel and the initial momenta are always antiparallel. The occurrence of new phenomena not occurring in a Lorentz invariant setting, such as upper thresholds and asymmetric pair production thresholds, is explained, and an illustrative example is given.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.67.124012

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At a threshold for a particle with momentum p1, the configuration is the minimum energy configuration of all other particles that conserves momentum.

    “Theorem 1: The configuration at a threshold for a particle with momentum p1 is the minimum energy configuration of all other particles that conserves momentum.”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [215]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mattingly, D., Jacobson, T., & Liberati, S.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2003-06-11
Volume
67
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2086600970
Cited by
61
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
Lorentz violation, dispersion relation, energy-momentum conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review