Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Particle creation in a tunneling universe. II. Massive particles

Hong, Jooyoo, Vilenkin, Alexander, Winitzki, Serge·2003·Physical Review D

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.68.023521

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2002, Hawking and Hertog introduced a 'top-down approach,' a form of the weak anthropic principle, to solve this problem.

    “In 2002, Hawking and Hertog[22] introduced a”

    From On Quantum Creation of a Toroidal Universe (2026) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Introduction discusses particle creation during cosmological tunneling, and the Discussion describes a Gaussian vacuum; neither addresses a top-down approach or the weak anthropic principle. Searches for Hawking and Hertog, “top-down approach,” and “anthropic principle” found no relevant passage in our copy. The printed citation [22] appears beside Hawking and Hertog, but our copy does not establish what that citation identifies. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. V.A. Rubakov, 1984, Phys. Lett., 148B, 280, 10.1016/0370-2693(84)90088-1 · DOI · Paper page
  2. D. Levkov, 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 66, 083516, 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.083516 · DOI
  3. A. Vilenkin, 1988, Phys. Rev. D, 37, 888, 10.1103/PhysRevD.37.888 · DOI · Paper page
  4. T. Vachaspati, 1988, Phys. Rev. D, 37, 898, 10.1103/PhysRevD.37.898 · DOI
  5. J. Garriga, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 56, 2464, 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.2464 · DOI
  6. J. Hong, 2003, Phys. Rev. D, 68, 023520, 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.023520 · DOI
  7. L. Parker, 1969, Phys. Rev., 183, 1057, 10.1103/PhysRev.183.1057 · DOI
  8. S.A. Fulling, 1979, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 10, 807, 10.1007/BF00756661 · DOI
  9. L. Parker, 1974, Phys. Rev. D, 9, 341, 10.1103/PhysRevD.9.341 · DOI · Paper page
  10. M. Bouhmadi-López, 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 66, 083504, 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.083504 · DOI
  11. V. Lapchinsky, 1979, Acta Phys. Pol. B, 10, 1041
  12. J.J. Halliwell, 1985, Phys. Rev. D, 31, 1777, 10.1103/PhysRevD.31.1777 · DOI · Paper page
  13. T. Banks, 1985, Nucl. Phys., B249, 332, 10.1016/0550-3213(85)90020-3 · DOI · Paper page
  14. T. Banks, 1973, Phys. Rev. D, 8, 3346, 10.1103/PhysRevD.8.3346 · DOI
  15. T. Banks, 1973, Phys. Rev. D, 8, 3366, 10.1103/PhysRevD.8.3366 · DOI
  16. S. Wada, 1986, Nucl. Phys., B276, 729, 10.1016/0550-3213(86)90073-8 · DOI
  17. T.S. Bunch, 1978, Proc. R. Soc. London, 360, 117, 10.1098/rspa.1978.0060 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hong, J., Vilenkin, A., & Winitzki, S.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2003-07-30
Volume
68
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2821
  • 1089-4918
Cited by
11
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review