Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 329

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Correlation of CMB with large-scale structure. I. Integrated Sachs-Wolfe tomography and cosmological implications

Open access
Ho, Shirley, Hirata, Christopher, Padmanabhan, Nikhil, Seljak, Uros, Bahcall, Neta·2008·Physical Review D

Abstract

We cross correlate large-scale structure (LSS) observations from a number of surveys with cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) to investigate the integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect as a function of redshift, covering $z\ensuremath{\sim}0.1--2.5$. Our main goal is to go beyond reporting detections towards developing a reliable likelihood analysis that allows one to determine cosmological constraints from ISW observations. With this in mind we spend a considerable amount of effort in determining the redshift-dependent bias and redshift distribution ($b(z)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}dN/dz$) of these samples by matching with spectroscopic observations where available, and analyzing autopower spectra and cross-power spectra between the samples. Because of wide redshift distributions of some of the data sets we do not assume a constant-bias model, in contrast to previous work on this subject. We only use the LSS data sets for which we can extract such information reliably and as a result the data sets we use are 2-Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) samples, Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) photometric Luminous Red Galaxies, SDSS photometric quasars, and NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) radio sources. We make a joint analysis of all samples constructing a full covariance matrix, which we subsequently use for cosmological parameter fitting. We report a $3.7\ensuremath{\sigma}$ detection of ISW combining all the data sets. We do not find significant evidence for an ISW signal at $z>1$, in agreement with theoretical expectation in the $\ensuremath{\Lambda}\mathrm{CDM}$ model. We combine the ISW likelihood function with weak lensing of CMB (hereafter Paper II [C. M. Hirata, S. Ho, N. Padmanabhan, U. Seljak, and N. A. Bahcall, arXiv:0801.0644.]) and CMB power spectrum to constrain the equation of state of dark energy and the curvature of the Universe. While ISW does not significantly improve the constraints in the simplest six-parameter flat $\ensuremath{\Lambda}\mathrm{CDM}$ model, it improves constraints on seven-parameter models with curvature by a factor of 3.2 (relative to WMAP alone) to ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{K}=\ensuremath{-}{0.004}_{\ensuremath{-}0.020}^{+0.014}$, and with dark energy equation of state by 15% to $w=\ensuremath{-}{1.01}_{\ensuremath{-}0.40}^{+0.30}$ [posterior median with ``$1\ensuremath{\sigma}$'' (16th--84th percentile) range]. A software package for calculating the ISW likelihood function can be downloaded at http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~shirley/ISW_WL.html.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.78.043519

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 329

Metadata

Authors
Ho, S., Hirata, C., Padmanabhan, N., Seljak, U., & Bahcall, N.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2008-08-13
Volume
78
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W1485300610
Cited by
329
References
9
FWCI
21.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation of CMB with large-scale structure. I. Integrated Sachs-Wolfe tomography and cosmological implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.78.043519
The paper
Ho, S., Hirata, C., Padmanabhan, N., Seljak, U., & Bahcall, N. (2008). Correlation of CMB with large-scale structure. I. Integrated Sachs-Wolfe tomography and cosmological implications. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.78.043519

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.