The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gravitational wave signatures of the absence of an event horizon: Nonradial oscillations of a thin-shell gravastar
Open accessAbstract
Gravitational waves from compact objects provide information about their structure, probing deep into strong-gravity regions. Here we illustrate how the presence or absence of an event horizon can produce qualitative differences in the gravitational waves emitted by ultracompact objects. In order to set up a straw-man ultracompact object with no event horizon, but which is otherwise almost identical to a black hole, we consider a nonrotating thin-shell model inspired by Mazur and Mottola's gravastar, which has a Schwarzschild exterior, a de Sitter interior and an infinitely thin shell with finite tension separating the two regions. As viewed from the external space-time, the shell can be located arbitrarily close to the Schwarzschild radius, so a gravastar might seem indistinguishable from a black hole when tests are only performed on its external metric. We study the linearized dynamics of the system, and, in particular, the junction conditions connecting internal and external gravitational perturbations. As a first application of the formalism we compute polar and axial oscillation modes of a thin-shell gravastar. We show that the quasinormal mode spectrum is completely different from that of a black hole, even in the limit when the surface redshift becomes infinite. Polar quasinormal modes depend on the equation of state of matter on the shell and can be used to distinguish between different gravastar models. Our calculations suggest that low-compactness gravastars could be unstable when the sound speed on the shell ${v}_{s}/c\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.92$.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A star in a 15.2-year orbit around the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way
Schödel, R., Ott, T., Genzel, R., Hofmann, R., Lehnert, M., Eckart, A., Mouawad, N., Alexander, T., Reid, M. J., Lenzen, R., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01121 · Cited by 1,166
Cited by
Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report
Cardoso, V., & Pani, P. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-019-0020-4 · Cited by 956
Self-citationIs the Gravitational-Wave Ringdown a Probe of the Event Horizon?
Cardoso, V., Franzin, E., & Pani, P. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.171101 · Cited by 819
Self-citationBlack holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap
Askar, A., Belczynski, C., Bertone, G., Bon, E., Blas, D., Brito, R., Bulik, T., Burrage, C., Byrnes, C. T., Caprini, C., et al. (2019) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587 · Cited by 744
Self-citationGravitational Condensate Stars: An Alternative to Black Holes
Mazur, P. O., & Mottola, E. (2023) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe9020088 · Cited by 374
Liebling, S. L., & Palenzuela, C. (2017) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0007-y · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Pani, P., Berti, E., Cardoso, V., Chen, Y., & Norte, R.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2009-12-30
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2062375244
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gravitational wave signatures of the absence of an event horizon: Nonradial oscillations of a thin-shell gravastar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.80.124047
- The paper
- Pani, P., Berti, E., Cardoso, V., Chen, Y., & Norte, R. (2009). Gravitational wave signatures of the absence of an event horizon: Nonradial oscillations of a thin-shell gravastar. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.80.124047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.