Cited by 48Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

New vertices and canonical quantization

Open access
Alexandrov, Sergei·2010·Physical Review D

Abstract

We present two results on the recently proposed new spin foam models. First, we show how a (slightly modified) restriction on representations in the Engle-Pereira-Rovelli-Livine model leads to the appearance of the Ashtekar-Barbero connection, thus bringing this model even closer to loop quantum gravity. Second, we however argue that the quantization procedure used to derive the new models is inconsistent since it relies on the symplectic structure of the unconstrained BF theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.82.024024

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Riemannian Gupta-Bleuler approach with γ > 1, restricting Spin(4) representations to the minimum-weight component j = j+ − j− satisfies the relevant condition.

    “Case γ > 1: In this case [13] one restricts the Spin(4) representations to 131 which amounts to choosing the minimum weight component j = j+ − j− in the expansion (182). This choice of is the solution to condition (188).”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [13]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexandrov, S.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Alexandrov, Sergei
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2010-07-19
Volume
82
Issue
2
Pages
024024
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2106127942
Cited by
48
References
34
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-09-BLAN-0041)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
spin foam models, loop quantum gravity, canonical quantization, BF theory, symplectic structure, quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review