Cited by 42Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The physical boundary Hilbert space and volume operator in the Lorentzian new spin-foam theory

Open access
Ding, You, Rovelli, Carlo·2010·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

A covariant spin-foam formulation of quantum gravity has been recently developed, characterized by a kinematics which appears to match well the one of canonical loop quantum gravity. In this paper we reconsider the implementation of the constraints that defines the model. We define in a simple way the boundary Hilbert space of the theory, introducing a slight modification of the embedding of the SU(2) representations into the SL(2,C) ones. We then show directly that all constraints vanish on this space in a weak sense. The vanishing is exact (and not just in the large quantum number limit.) We also generalize the definition of the volume operator in the spinfoam model to the Lorentzian signature, and show that it matches the one of loop quantum gravity, as does in the Euclidean case.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/27/20/205003

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Geometric operators such as volume and area defined in the covariant context coincide with the corresponding operators in the canonical formulation.

    “Moreover, geometric operators such as volume and area defined in the covariant context are shown to coincide with the corresponding operators defined in the canonical formulation [141, 142].”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [141]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17][17] R Pereira, 'Lorentzian LQG vertex amplitude' , Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 085013; arXiv:0710.5043 [gr-qc] - · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, Y., & Rovelli, C.
Affiliations
Centre de Physique Théorique (FR)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2010-09-07
Volume
27
Issue
20
Pages
205003
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2014405245
Cited by
42
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-09-BLAN-0041)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
spin foam models, volume operator, quantum gravity, discrete spacetime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review