Cited by 23Neural dynamics and brain functionFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Spatiotemporal complexity patterns of resting-state bioelectrical activity explain fluid intelligence: sex matters

Open access
Dreszer, Joanna, Grochowski, Marek, Lewandowska, Monika, Nikadon, Jan, Gorgol, Joanna, Bałaj, Bibianna, Finc, Karolina, Duch, Włodzisław +3 more·2020·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Neural complexity is thought to be associated with efficient information processing but the exact nature of this relation remains unclear. Here, the relationship of fluid intelligence (gf) with the resting-state EEG (rsEEG) complexity over different timescales and different electrodes was investigated. A 6-min rsEEG blocks of eyes open were analyzed. The results of 119 subjects (57 men, mean age = 22.85 ± 2.84 years) were examined using multivariate multiscale sample entropy (mMSE) that quantifies changes in information richness of rsEEG in multiple data channels at fine and coarse timescales. gf factor was extracted from six intelligence tests. Partial least square regression analysis revealed that mainly predictors of the rsEEG complexity at coarse timescales in the frontoparietal network (FPN) and the temporo-parietal complexities at fine timescales were relevant to higher gf. Sex differently affected the relationship between fluid intelligence and EEG complexity at rest. In men, gf was mainly positively related to the complexity at coarse timescales in the FPN. Furthermore, at fine and coarse timescales positive relations in the parietal region were revealed. In women, positive relations with gf were mostly observed for the overall and the coarse complexity in the FPN, whereas negative associations with gf were found for the complexity at fine timescales in the parietal and centro-temporal region. These outcomes indicate that two separate time pathways (corresponding to fine and coarse timescales) used to characterize rsEEG complexity (expressed by mMSE features) are beneficial for effective information processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.25162

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence on the exact nature of the relationship between intelligence and complexity measures is currently mixed.

    “Evidence on the exact nature of the relationship between intelligence and complexity measures is currently mixed ( Saxe et al., 2018 ; Dreszer et al., 2020 ; Wang, 2021 ; Thiele et al., 2023 ).”

    From What does it mean for consciousness to be multidimensional? A narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as Dreszer et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Frigg, R., & Werndl, C. (2011). Entropy ‐ a guide for the perplexed In Beisbart C. & Hartmann S. (Eds.), Probabilities in physics (pp. 115– 142). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dreszer, J., Grochowski, M., Lewandowska, M., Nikadon, J., Gorgol, J., Bałaj, B., Finc, K., Duch, W., Kałamała, P., Chuderski, A., & Piotrowski, T.
Affiliations
  • Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL)
  • University of Warsaw (PL)
  • Jagiellonian University (PL)
Corresponding author
Dreszer, Joanna
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-18
Volume
41
Issue
17
Pages
4846-4865
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W3071159487
Cited by
23
References
142
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Narodowe Centrum Nauki (2016/20/W/NZ4/00354, 2019/33/B/HS6/00321, 2015/18/E/HS6/00399)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
fluid intelligence, resting-state EEG, neural complexity, multiscale sample entropy, sex differences, frontoparietal network, parietal region, processing efficiency, spatiotemporal complexity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Models, Theoretical, Sex Characteristics, Young Adult, Brain Waves, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review