The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomness versus Nonlocality and Entanglement
Open accessAbstract
The outcomes obtained in Bell tests involving two-outcome measurements on two subsystems can, in principle, generate up to 2 bits of randomness. However, the maximal violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality guarantees the generation of only 1.23 bits of randomness. We prove here that quantum correlations with arbitrarily little nonlocality and states with arbitrarily little entanglement can be used to certify that close to the maximum of 2 bits of randomness are produced. Our results show that nonlocality, entanglement, and randomness are inequivalent quantities. They also imply that device-independent quantum key distribution with an optimal key generation rate is possible by using almost-local correlations and that device-independent randomness generation with an optimal rate is possible with almost-local correlations and with almost-unentangled states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Although non-locality or entanglement certi fi es the randomness, the three quantities, non-locality, entanglement and randomness, are not equivalent. 68”
From Quantum random number generation (2016) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Maximum randomness generation does not require maximum non-local correlation or a maximum entangled state.”
From Quantum random number generation (2016) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It is shown that 2 bits of randomness can be certi fi ed with little involvement of non-locality and entanglement. 68”
From Quantum random number generation (2016) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880 · Cited by 7,573
Quantum information and computation
Bennett, C. H., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35005001 · Cited by 3,263
Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations
Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, H. J., Popescu, S., & Schumacher, B. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2046 · Cited by 3,151
Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics
Bell, J. S., & Mermin, N. D. (1988) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2811599 · Cited by 2,985
Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics
Whitaker, M. A. B. (1988) · Endeavour · doi:10.1016/0160-9327(88)90092-0 · Cited by 2,228
Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks
Acín, A., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Massar, S., Pironio, S., & Scarani, V. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.230501 · Cited by 1,537
Self-citationRandom numbers certified by Bell’s theorem
Pironio, S., Acín, A., Massar, S., de la Giroday, A. B., Matsukevich, D. N., Maunz, P., Olmschenk, S., Hayes, D., Luo, L., Manning, T. A., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09008 · Cited by 1,420
Self-citationHidden variables, joint probability, and the Bell inequalities
Fine, A. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.291 · Cited by 1,181
No Signaling and Quantum Key Distribution
Barrett, J., Hardy, L., & Kent, A. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.010503 · Cited by 916
Nonlocal correlations as an information-theoretic resource
Barrett, J., Linden, N., Massar, S., Pironio, S., Popescu, S., & Roberts, D. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.022101 · Cited by 630
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., & Wehner, S. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.419 · Cited by 2,688
Self-citationScarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.001.0001 · Cited by 714
Uola, R., Costa, A. C. S., Nguyen, H. C., & Gühne, O. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015001 · Cited by 641
Quantum random number generation
Ma, X., Yuan, X., Cao, Z., Qi, B., & Zhang, Z. (2016) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/npjqi.2016.21 · Cited by 445
Security in quantum cryptography
Portmann, C., & Renner, R. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.025008 · Cited by 475
Self-testing of quantum systems: a review
Šupić, I., & Bowles, J. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-09-30-337 · Cited by 365
Certified randomness in quantum physics
Acín, A., & Masanes, L. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20119 · Cited by 307
Self-citationPractical device-independent quantum cryptography via entropy accumulation
Arnon-Friedman, R., Dupuis, F., Fawzi, O., Renner, R., & Vidick, T. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02307-4 · Cited by 289
Nonlocality beyond quantum mechanics
Popescu, S. (2014) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2916 · Cited by 215
All pure bipartite entangled states can be self-tested
Coladangelo, A., Goh, K. T., & Scarani, V. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15485 · Cited by 205
Bamps, C., & Pironio, S. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.052111 · Cited by 193
Self-citationFull randomness from arbitrarily deterministic events
Gallego, R., Masanes, L., De La Torre, G., Dhara, C., Aolita, L., & Acín, A. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3654 · Cited by 186
Self-citationSecurity of practical private randomness generation
Pironio, S., & Massar, S. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.012336 · Cited by 169
Self-citationAdvances in device-independent quantum key distribution
Zapatero, V., van Leent, T., Arnon-Friedman, R., Liu, W., Zhang, Q., Weinfurter, H., & Curty, M. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00684-x · Cited by 193
Simple and Tight Device-Independent Security Proofs
Arnon-Friedman, R., Renner, R., & Vidick, T. (2019) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/18m1174726 · Cited by 178
Quantum randomness extraction for various levels of characterization of the devices
Law, Y. Z., Le, T. P., Bancal, J.-D., & Scarani, V. (2014) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424028 · Cited by 160
More randomness from the same data
Bancal, J.-D., Sheridan, L., & Scarani, V. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/3/033011 · Cited by 148
Unbounded randomness certification using sequences of measurements
Curchod, F. J., Johansson, M., Augusiak, R., Hoban, M. J., Wittek, P., & Acín, A. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.020102 · Cited by 145
Self-citationOptimal randomness certification from one entangled bit
Acín, A., Pironio, S., Vértesi, T., & Wittek, P. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.040102 · Cited by 140
Self-citationRobust self-testing of unknown quantum systems into any entangled two-qubit states
Yang, T. H., & Navascués, M. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.050102 · Cited by 130
Using complete measurement statistics for optimal device-independent randomness evaluation
Nieto-Silleras, O., Pironio, S., & Silman, J. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/013035 · Cited by 132
Self-citationPhysical characterization of quantum devices from nonlocal correlations
Bancal, J.-D., Navascués, M., Scarani, V., Vértesi, T., & Yang, T. H. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.022115 · Cited by 126
Optimal randomness certification in the quantum steering and prepare-and-measure scenarios
Passaro, E., Cavalcanti, D., Skrzypczyk, P., & Acín, A. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/11/113010 · Cited by 123
Self-citationQuantitative relations between measurement incompatibility, quantum steering, and nonlocality
Cavalcanti, D., & Skrzypczyk, P. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.052112 · Cited by 115
Randomness in quantum mechanics: philosophy, physics and technology
Bera, M. N., Acín, A., Kuś, M., Mitchell, M. W., & Lewenstein, M. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa8731 · Cited by 122
Self-citationSecurity and composability of randomness expansion from Bell inequalities
Fehr, S., Gelles, R., & Schaffner, C. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.012335 · Cited by 104
Brown, P. J., & Colbeck, R. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.090401 · Cited by 105
Self-testing of binary observables based on commutation
Kaniewski, J. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.062323 · Cited by 96
Bell Inequalities Tailored to Maximally Entangled States
Salavrakos, A., Augusiak, R., Tura, J., Wittek, P., Acín, A., & Pironio, S. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.040402 · Cited by 102
Self-citationSelf-testing protocols based on the chained Bell inequalities
Šupić, I., Augusiak, R., Salavrakos, A., & Acín, A. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/3/035013 · Cited by 84
Self-citationScalable Bell Inequalities for Qubit Graph States and Robust Self-Testing
Baccari, F., Augusiak, R., Šupić, I., Tura, J., & Acín, A. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.020402 · Cited by 94
Self-citationQuantifying Bell: the Resource Theory of Nonclassicality of Common-Cause Boxes
Wolfe, E., Schmid, D., Sainz, A. B., Kunjwal, R., & Spekkens, R. W. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-06-08-280 · Cited by 88
Robust self-testing of the three-qubit W state
Wu, X., Cai, Y., Yang, T. H., Lê, H. N., Bancal, J.-D., & Scarani, V. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.042339 · Cited by 80
Self-Testing Entangled Measurements in Quantum Networks
Renou, M.-O., Kaniewski, J., & Brunner, N. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.250507 · Cited by 73
Device-independent quantum key distribution with single-photon sources
Kołodyński, J., Máttar, A., Skrzypczyk, P., Woodhead, E., Cavalcanti, D., Banaszek, K., & Acín, A. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-04-30-260 · Cited by 80
Self-citationRealistic noise-tolerant randomness amplification using finite number of devices
Brandão, F. G. S. L., Ramanathan, R., Grudka, A., Horodecki, K., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., Szarek, T., & Wojewódka–Ściążko, H. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11345 · Cited by 69
Device-independent quantum key distribution with asymmetric CHSH inequalities
Woodhead, E., Acín, A., & Pironio, S. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-04-26-443 · Cited by 64
Self-citationKaniewski, J., Šupić, I., Tura, J., Baccari, F., Salavrakos, A., & Augusiak, R. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-10-24-198 · Cited by 72
Advanced Tailored Randomness: A Novel Approach for Improving the Efficacy of Biological Systems
Ilan, Y. (2019) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.2019.0231 · Cited by 64
Bell tests with min-entropy sources
Le, T. P., Sheridan, L., & Scarani, V. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.062121 · Cited by 59
Identifying nonconvexity in the sets of limited-dimension quantum correlations
Donohue, J. M., & Wolfe, E. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.062120 · Cited by 55
Computing secure key rates for quantum cryptography with untrusted devices
Tan, E. Y.-Z., Schwonnek, R., Goh, K. T., Primaatmaja, I. W., & Lim, C. C. W. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00494-z · Cited by 59
Self-testing quantum systems of arbitrary local dimension with minimal number of measurements
Sarkar, S., Saha, D., Kaniewski, J., & Augusiak, R. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00490-3 · Cited by 62
Experimental Certification of Sustained Entanglement and Nonlocality after Sequential Measurements
Foletto, G., Calderaro, L., Tavakoli, A., Schiavon, M., Picciariello, F., Cabello, A., Villoresi, P., & Vallone, G. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.13.044008 · Cited by 50
Maximally Nonlocal Theories Cannot Be Maximally Random
de la Torre, G., Hoban, M. J., Dhara, C., Prettico, G., & Acín, A. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.160502 · Cited by 49
Self-citationTowards a realization of device-independent quantum key distribution
Murta, G., van Dam, S. B., Ribeiro, J., Hanson, R., & Wehner, S. (2019) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab2819 · Cited by 46
Efficient randomness certification by quantum probability estimation
Zhang, Y., Fu, H., & Knill, E. H. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.013016 · Cited by 49
Device-independent quantum key distribution from generalized CHSH inequalities
Sekatski, P., Bancal, J.-D., Valcarce, X., Tan, E. Y.-Z., Renner, R., & Sangouard, N. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-04-26-444 · Cited by 46
Certified Quantum Random Numbers from Untrusted Light
Drahi, D., Walk, N., Hoban, M. J., Fedorov, A. K., Shakhovoy, R., Feimov, A., Kurochkin, Y., Kolthammer, W. S., Nunn, J., & Barrett, J. (2020) · Goldsmiths (University of London) · doi:10.17169/refubium-29280 · Cited by 46
Maximal quantum randomness in Bell tests
Dhara, C., Prettico, G., & Acín, A. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.052116 · Cited by 48
Self-citationMeasurement-device–independent randomness from local entangled states
Chaturvedi, A., & Banik, M. (2015) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/112/30003 · Cited by 46
Device-independent quantum key distribution from generalized CHSH inequalities
Sekatski, P., Bancal, J.-D., Valcarce, X., Tan, E. Y.-Z., Renner, R., & Sangouard, N. (2021) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000493926 · Cited by 44
Navascués, M., de la Torre, G., & Vértesi, T. (2014) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.4.011011 · Cited by 52
Certified Quantum Random Numbers from Untrusted Light
Drahi, D., Walk, N., Hoban, M. J., Fedorov, A. K., Shakhovoy, R., Feimov, A., Kurochkin, Y., Kolthammer, W. S., Nunn, J., Barrett, J., et al. (2020) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.041048 · Cited by 63
Quantum random number generation using a hexagonal boron nitride single photon emitter
White, S., Klauck, F., Tran, T. T., Schmitt, N., Kianinia, M., Steinfurth, A., Heinrich, M., Toth, M., Szameit, A., Aharonovich, I., et al. (2020) · Journal of Optics · doi:10.1088/2040-8986/abccff · Cited by 44
Kaniewski, J., Šupić, I., Tura i Brugués, J., Baccari, F., Salavrakos, A., & Augusiak, R. (2019) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 41
Experimental test of sequential weak measurements for certified quantum randomness extraction
Foletto, G., Padovan, M., Avesani, M., Tebyanian, H., Villoresi, P., & Vallone, G. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.062206 · Cited by 42
Farkas, M., Balanzó-Juandó, M., Łukanowski, K., Kołodyński, J., & Acín, A. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.050503 · Cited by 40
Self-citationNavascués, M., de la, T. G., & Vértesi, T. (2014) · Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) · Cited by 37
Maximal randomness from partially entangled states
Woodhead, E., Kaniewski, J., Bourdoncle, B., Salavrakos, A., Bowles, J., Acín, A., & Augusiak, R. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.042028 · Cited by 38
Self-citationQuantum to Classical Randomness Extractors
Berta, M., Fawzi, O., & Wehner, S. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2013.2291780 · Cited by 45
Schmid, D., Fraser, T. C., Kunjwal, R., Sainz, A. B., Wolfe, E., & Spekkens, R. W. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-12-04-1194 · Cited by 63
Device-independent characterization of quantum instruments
Wagner, S., Bancal, J.-D., Sangouard, N., & Sekatski, P. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-03-19-243 · Cited by 43
Elemental and tight monogamy relations in nonsignaling theories
Augusiak, R., Demianowicz, M., Pawłowski, M., Tura, J., & Acín, A. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.052323 · Cited by 36
Self-citationOne-sided device-independent self-testing of any pure two-qubit entangled state
Goswami, S., Bhattacharya, B., Das, D., Sasmal, S., Jebarathinam, C., & Majumdar, A. S. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.022311 · Cited by 37
Device-Independent Detection of Genuine Multipartite Entanglement for All Pure States
Zwerger, M. J., Dür, W., Bancal, J.-D., & Sekatski, P. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.060502 · Cited by 34
Device-independent randomness generation from several Bell estimators
Nieto-Silleras, O., Bamps, C., Silman, J., & Pironio, S. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aaaa06 · Cited by 35
Self-citationTight Analytic Bound on the Trade-Off between Device-Independent Randomness and Nonlocality
Wooltorton, L., Brown, P. J., & Colbeck, R. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.150403 · Cited by 37
Quantum violations in the Instrumental scenario and their relations to the Bell scenarioPreprint
van Himbeeck, T., Brask Bohr, J., Pironio, S., Ramanathan, R., Sainz, A. B., & Wolfe, E. (2018) · Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) · Cited by 36
Self-citationQuantum violations in the Instrumental scenario and their relations to the Bell scenario
Himbeeck, T. V., Brask, J. B., Pironio, S., Ramanathan, R., Sainz, A. B., & Wolfe, E. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-09-16-186 · Cited by 44
Self-citationGómez, S., Máttar, A., Machuca, I., Gómez, E. S., Cavalcanti, D., Farías, O. J., Acín, A., & Lima, G. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.032108 · Cited by 30
Self-citationFree randomness amplification using bipartite chain correlations
Grudka, A., Horodecki, K., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., Pawłowski, M., & Ramanathan, R. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.032322 · Cited by 32
Randomness Certification from Multipartite Quantum Steering for Arbitrary Dimensional Systems
Li, Y., Xiang, Y., Yu, X., Nguyen, H. C., Gühne, O., & He, Q. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.080201 · Cited by 30
Certifying quantum randomness by probability estimation
Zhang, Y., Knill, E. H., & Bierhorst, P. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.040304 · Cited by 34
Robust self-testing of two-qubit states
Coopmans, T. J., Kaniewski, J., & Schaffner, C. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.052123 · Cited by 33
Randomness versus nonlocality in the Mermin-Bell experiment with three parties
Woodhead, E., Bourdoncle, B., & Acín, A. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-17-82 · Cited by 31
Self-citationFully device-independent model on quantum networks
Luo, M. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013203 · Cited by 32
Hardy's test as a device-independent dimension witness
Mukherjee, A., Roy, A., Bhattacharya, S. S., Das, S., Gazi, M. R., & Banik, M. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.022302 · Cited by 30
Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution with Arbitrarily Small Nonlocality
Wooltorton, L., Brown, P. J., & Colbeck, R. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.210802 · Cited by 34
Experimental demonstration of robust self-testing for bipartite entangled states
Zhang, W.-H., Chen, G., Yin, P., Peng, X.-X., Hu, X., Hou, Z., Zhou, Z., Yu, S., Ye, X.-J., Zhou, Z., et al. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0120-0 · Cited by 29
Chen, S.-L., Ku, H.-Y., Zhou, W., Tura, J., & Chen, Y.-N. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-09-28-552 · Cited by 26
Two-Qubit Pure Entanglement as Optimal Social Welfare Resource in Bayesian Game
Banik, M., Bhattacharya, S. S., Ganguly, N., Guha, T., Mukherjee, A., Rai, A., & Roy, A. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-09-09-185 · Cited by 26
Semi-device-independent certification of indefinite causal order
Bavaresco, J., Araújo, M., Brukner, Č., & Quintino, M. T. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-08-19-176 · Cited by 37
Gonzales-Ureta, J. R., Predojević, A., & Cabello, A. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.052436 · Cited by 26
Pan, A. K. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.022212 · Cited by 29
Coladangelo, A. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.052115 · Cited by 24
Generation of quantum randomness by probability estimation with classical side information
Knill, E. H., Zhang, Y., & Bierhorst, P. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033465 · Cited by 27
Device-independent certification of one-shot distillable entanglement
Arnon-Friedman, R., & Bancal, J.-D. (2019) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000334532 · Cited by 23
Device-independent certification of one-shot distillable entanglement
Arnon-Friedman, R., & Bancal, J.-D. (2019) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aafef6 · Cited by 27
Masini, M., Pironio, S., & Woodhead, E. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-10-20-843 · Cited by 26
Self-citationDat, T. Q., & Duc, T. M. (2022) · Optik · doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.168744 · Cited by 22
Coladangelo, A. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-06-18-282 · Cited by 22
Cai, Z., Ren, C., Feng, T., Zhou, X., & Chen, J. (2024) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.10.003 · Cited by 28
Revealing universal quantum contextuality through communication games
Pan, A. K. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53701-5 · Cited by 22
Ab initio experimental violation of Bell inequalities
Poderini, D., Polino, E., Rodari, G., Suprano, A., Chaves, R., & Sciarrino, F. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013159 · Cited by 24
Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution Based on the Mermin-Peres Magic Square Game
Zhen, Y.-Z., Mao, Y., Zhang, Y., Xu, F., & Sanders, B. C. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.080801 · Cited by 21
Optimal Robust Self-Testing by Binary Nonlocal XOR Games
Miller, C. A., & Shi, Y. (2013) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.tqc.2013.254 · Cited by 23
Relationship between semi- and fully-device-independent protocols
Li, H.-W., Mironowicz, P., Pawłowski, M., Yin, Z., Wu, Y.-C., Wang, S., Chén, W., Hu, H., Guo, G., & Han, Z. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.020302 · Cited by 24
Semi-device-independent certification of indefinite causal order
Bavaresco, J., Araújo, M., Brukner, Č., & Quintino, M. T. (2019) · Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) · Cited by 19
Quantifying EPR: the resource theory of nonclassicality of common-cause assemblages
Zjawin, B., Schmid, D., Hoban, M. J., & Sainz, A. B. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-16-926 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Acín, A., Massar, S., & Pironio, S.
- Affiliations
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-03-09
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 100402-100402
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W1985083346
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 15.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Random lasers and scattering media
- Keywords
- randomness generation, nonlocality, entanglement, Bell tests, CHSH inequality, device-independent quantum key distribution, device-independent randomness generation, quantum correlations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
