Cited by 186Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsRandom lasers and scattering media

Full randomness from arbitrarily deterministic events

Open access
Gallego, Rodrigo, Masanes, Lluis, De La Torre, Gonzalo, Dhara, Chirag, Aolita, Leandro, Acín, Antonio·2013·Nature Communications

Abstract

Do completely unpredictable events exist? Classical physics excludes fundamental randomness. Although quantum theory makes probabilistic predictions, this does not imply that nature is random, as randomness should be certified without relying on the complete structure of the theory being used. Bell tests approach the question from this perspective. However, they require prior perfect randomness, falling into a circular reasoning. A Bell test that generates perfect random bits from bits possessing high-but less than perfect-randomness has recently been obtained. Yet, the main question remained open: does any initial randomness suffice to certify perfect randomness? Here we show that this is indeed the case. We provide a Bell test that uses arbitrarily imperfect random bits to produce bits that are, under the non-signalling principle assumption, perfectly random. This provides the first protocol attaining full randomness amplification. Our results have strong implications onto the debate of whether there exist events that are fully random.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms3654

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perfectly random bits can be generated using a five-party Mermin inequality with arbitrarily imperfect random bits under the no-signalling assumption.

    “Gallego et al ., 74 who demonstrated that perfectly random bits can be generated using a fi ve-party Mermin inequality 75 with arbitrarily imperfect random bits under the no-signalling assumption.”

    From Quantum random number generation (2016) · cites this paper as [74]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallego, R., Masanes, L., De La Torre, G., Dhara, C., Aolita, L., & Acín, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Photonic Sciences (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Acín, Antonio
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2013-10-30
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
2654-2654
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034377058
Cited by
186
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 7
FWCI
25.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver
Funders
  • European Commission (299141)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-CHRI-0007)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya
  • CHIST-ERA
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Random lasers and scattering media
Keywords
Bell tests, quantum nonlocality, randomness certification, quantum randomness, indeterminism
MeSH terms
Humans, Philosophy, Probability, Quantum Theory, Stochastic Processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review