Cited by 218Orbital Angular Momentum in OpticsPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Weak Measurements of Light Chirality with a Plasmonic Slit

Open access

Abstract

We examine, both experimentally and theoretically, an interaction of tightly focused polarized light with a slit on a metal surface supporting plasmon-polariton modes. Remarkably, this simple system can be highly sensitive to the polarization of the incident light and offers a perfect quantum weak measurement tool with a built-in postselection in the plasmon-polariton mode. We observe the plasmonic spin Hall effect in both coordinate and momentum spaces which is interpreted as weak measurements of the helicity of light with real and imaginary weak values determined by the input polarization. Our experiment combines the advantages of (i) quantum weak measurements, (ii) near-field plasmonic systems, and (iii) high-numerical aperture microscopy in employing the spin-orbit interaction of light and probing light chirality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.109.013901

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. F. I. Fedorov, 1955, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 105, 465

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Gorodetski, Y., Bliokh, K. Y., Stein, B., Genet, C., Shitrit, N., Kleiner, V., Hasman, E., & Ebbesen, T. W.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2012-07-05
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
013901-013901
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2011468611
Cited by
218
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Keywords
weak measurement, weak values, spin-orbit interaction of light, post-selection, near-field plasmonics, high numerical aperture microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review