Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Totally Destructive Many-Particle Interference

Dittel, Christoph, Dufour, Gabriel, Walschaers, Mattia, Weihs, Gregor, Buchleitner, Andreas, Keil, Robert·2018·Physical Review Letters

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.120.240404

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A new quantum approach based on variational methods and phase estimation was introduced and experimentally tested to approximate eigenvalues for ground and excited states.

    “Very recently, a new quantum approach based on variational methods and phase estimation was introduced [634], and experimentally tested, to approximate eigenvalues for ground and excited states.”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [634]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1038/35051009 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2921 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.4904 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.1250057 · DOI
  5. W. Pauli, 1964, Nobel Lectures
  6. 10.1038/nature00911 · DOI
  7. K. Mattle, 1995, Appl. Phys. B, 60, S111
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.893 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1364/OE.20.026895 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.013809 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.063819 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/ncomms2616 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.153603 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.959 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.023604 · DOI
  16. 10.1364/OL.34.001297 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/09500340.2016.1242790 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.220405 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/093015 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/ncomms10469 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.080502 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.012309 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/ncomms11027 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.013811 · DOI
  25. 10.1088/1367-2630/aaad92 · DOI
  26. 10.1088/2058-9565/aa540c · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.062116 · DOI
  28. 10.1088/0953-4075/47/10/103001 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.062307 · DOI
  30. 10.1364/OE.21.013450 · DOI
  31. 10.1088/2040-8978/18/11/114002 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41598-017-14680-7 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.022333 · DOI
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.013844 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.022316 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.020502 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.022119 · DOI
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dittel, C., Dufour, G., Walschaers, M., Weihs, G., Buchleitner, A., & Keil, R.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2018-06-15
Volume
120
Issue
24
ISSN
  • 0031-9007
  • 1079-7114
Cited by
46
References
18
Language
en
Funders
  • Austrian Science Fund (I 2562, P 30459, M 1849)
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • Austrian Academy of Sciences
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • EU Collaborative project (641277)
  • European Union (665148)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review