The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three-photon bosonic coalescence in an integrated tritter
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The first experimental demonstrations of Boson sampling were reported with n = 3 photons, mainly in integrated photonics.
“The first experimental demonstrations of Boson sampling were reported with n = 3 photons [91-95], mainly in integrated photonics.”
From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [95]
The Discussion reports a three-photon experiment in an integrated tritter and calls it the first observation of bosonic coalescence in a symmetric three-port device. It does not identify the experiment as a Boson-sampling demonstration or establish that it was among the first such demonstrations; it discusses hard-to-simulate multiphoton platforms as a future possibility. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880
Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369
Lloyd, S. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5278.1073 · Cited by 3,088
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410
The computational complexity of linear optics
Aaronson, S., & Arkhipov, A. (2011) · Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/1993636.1993682 · Cited by 874
Two-Particle Bosonic-Fermionic Quantum Walk via Integrated Photonics
Sansoni, L., Sciarrino, F., Vallone, G., Mataloni, P., Crespi, A., Ramponi, R., & Osellame, R. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.010502 · Cited by 578
Self-citationDe Broglie wavelength of a non-local four-photon state
Walther, P., Pan, J.-W., Aspelmeyer, M., Ursin, R., Gasparoni, S., & Zeilinger, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02552 · Cited by 555
Integrated photonic quantum gates for polarization qubits
Crespi, A., Ramponi, R., Osellame, R., Sansoni, L., Bongioanni, I., Sciarrino, F., Vallone, G., & Mataloni, P. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1570 · Cited by 351
Self-citationControl of directional evanescent coupling in fs laser written waveguides
Szameit, A., Dreisow, F., Pertsch, T., Nolte, S., & Tünnermann, A. (2007) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.15.001579 · Cited by 204
Experimental Observation of Four-Photon Entanglement from Parametric Down-Conversion
Eibl, M., Gaertner, S., Bourennane, M., Kurtsiefer, C., Żukowski, M., & Weinfurter, H. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.200403 · Cited by 181
Two-photon quantum walks in an elliptical direct-write waveguide array
Owens, J. O., Broome, M. A., Biggerstaff, D. N., Goggin, M. E., Fedrizzi, A., Linjordet, T., Ams, M., Marshall, G. D., Twamley, J., Withford, M. J., et al. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/7/075003 · Cited by 135
Quantum-mechanical description of two coupled harmonic oscillators
Estes, L. E., Keil, T. H., & Narducci, L. M. (1968) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.175.286 · Cited by 74
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Ou, Z. Temporal distinguishability of an n-photon state and its characterization by quantum interference. Phys. Rev. A 74, 063808 (2006). · DOI
- Yamamoto, T., Koashi, M., Ozdemir, S. & Imoto, N. Experimental extraction of an entangled photon pair from two identically decohered pairs. Nature 421, 343–346 (2003). · DOI
- Shih, Y. H. & Alley, C. O. New type of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment using pairs of light quanta produced by optical parametric down conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett 61, 2921–2924 (1988). · DOI · Paper page
- Zou, X., Pahlke, K. & Mathis, W. Generation of entangled photon states by using linear optical elements. Phys. Rev. A 66, 014102 (2002). · DOI
- Greenberger, D. M., Home, M. A. & Zeilinger, A. Multiparticle interferometry and the quantum superposition principle. Phys. Today 46, 22–29 (1993). · DOI
- Greenberger, D. M., Home, M. A. & Zeilinger, A. Similarities and differences between two-particle and three-particle interference. Fortschr. Phys. 48, 243–252 (2000). · DOI
- Zukowski, M., Zeilinger, A. & Horne, M. A. Realizable higher-dimensional two-particle entanglements via multiport beam splitters. Phys. Rev. A 55, 2564–2579 (1997). · DOI · Paper page
- Howell, J. C. & Yeazell, J. A. Quantum computation through entangling single photons in multipath interferometers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 198–201 (2000). · DOI
- Reck, M., Zeilinger, A., Bernstein, H. J. & Bertani, P. Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 58–61 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
- Tichy, M. C., Tiersch, M., de Melo, F., Mintert, F. & Buchleitner, A. Zero-transmission law for multiport beam splitters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 220405 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
- Spagnolo, N. et al. Quantum interferometry with 3-dimensional geometry. Sci. Rep 2, 862 (2012). · DOI
- Campos, R. A. Three-photon Hong-Ou-Mandel interference at a multiport mixer. Phys. Rev. A 62, 013809 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
- Weihs, G., Reck, M., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Two-photon interference in optical fiber multiports. Phys. Rev. A 54, 893–897 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
- Kowalevicz, A. M. et al. Three-dimensional photonic devices fabricated in glass by use of a femtosecond laser oscillator. Opt. Letters 30, 1060–1062 (2005). · DOI
- Suzuki, K., Sharma, V., Fujimoto, J. G., Ippen, E. P. & Nasu, Y. Characterization of symmetric [3 × 3] directional couplers fabricated by direct writing with a femtosecond laser oscillator. Phys. Rev. A 80, 032318 (2009). · DOI
- Meany, T. et al. Non-classical interference in integrated 3d multiports. Opt. Express 20, 26895–26905 (2012). · DOI
- Gattass, R. R. & Mazur, E. Femtosecond laser micromachining in transparent materials. Nat. Photon. 2, 219–225 (2008). · DOI
- Della Valle, G., Osellame, R. & Laporta, P. Micromachining of photonic devices by femtosecond laser pulses. J. Opt. A 11, 013001 (2009). · DOI
- Osellame, R., Hoekstra, H. J. W. M., Cerullo, G. & Pollnau, M. Femtosecond laser microstructuring: an enabling tool for optofluidic lab-on-chips. Laser Phot. Rev. 5, 442–463 (2011). · DOI
- Peruzzo, A., Laing, A., Politi, A., Rudolph, T. & O’Brien, J. L. Multimode quantum interference of photons in multiport integrated devices. Nat. Commun. 2, 244 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
- Metcalf, B. J. et al. Multi-photon quantum interference in a multi-port integrated photonic device. Nat. Commun. 4, 1356 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
- Pryde, G. J. & White, A. G. Creation of maximally entangled photon-number states using optical fiber multiports. Phys. Rev. A 68, 052315 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
- Gruca, J., Laskowski, W. & Zukowski, M. Nonclassicality of pure two-qutrit entangled states. Phys. Rev. A 85, 022118 (2012). · DOI
- Radmark, M., Zukowski, M. & Bourennane, M. Experimental test of fidelity limits in six-photon interferometry and of rotational invariance properties of the photonic six-qubit entanglement singlet state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 150501 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrated photonic quantum technologies
Wang, J., Sciarrino, F., Laing, A., & Thompson, M. G. (2020) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0532-1 · Cited by 1,576
Self-citationCarolan, J., Harrold, C., Sparrow, C., Martín-López, E., Russell, N. J., Silverstone, J. W., Shadbolt, P. J., Matsuda, N., Oguma, M., Itoh, M., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab3642 · Cited by 1,093
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
Self-citationIntegrated multimode interferometers with arbitrary designs for photonic boson sampling
Crespi, A., Osellame, R., Ramponi, R., Brod, D. J., Galvão, E. F., Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Maiorino, E., Mataloni, P., & Sciarrino, F. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.112 · Cited by 662
Self-citationExperimental validation of photonic boson sampling
Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Bentivegna, M., Brod, D. J., Crespi, A., Flamini, F., Giacomini, S., Milani, G., Ramponi, R., Mataloni, P., et al. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.135 · Cited by 312
Self-citationTwo-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a · Cited by 232
Self-citationLaser written circuits for quantum photonics
Meany, T., Gräfe, M., Heilmann, R., Perez‐Leija, A., Gross, S., Steel, M. J., Withford, M. J., & Szameit, A. (2015) · Laser & Photonics Reviews · doi:10.1002/lpor.201500061 · Cited by 230
Optimal measurements for simultaneous quantum estimation of multiple phases
Pezzè, L., Ciampini, M. A., Spagnolo, N., Humphreys, P. C., Datta, A., Walmsley, I. A., Barbieri, M., Sciarrino, F., & Smerzi, A. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.130504 · Cited by 200
Self-citationStringent and Efficient Assessment of Boson-Sampling Devices
Tichy, M. C., Mayer, K., Buchleitner, A., & Mølmer, K. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.020502 · Cited by 127
Quantum-enhanced multiparameter estimation in multiarm interferometers
Ciampini, M. A., Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Pezzè, L., Smerzi, A., & Sciarrino, F. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep28881 · Cited by 104
Experimental multiphase estimation on a chip
Polino, E., Riva, M., Valeri, M., Silvestri, R., Corrielli, G., Crespi, A., Spagnolo, N., Osellame, R., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.6.000288 · Cited by 101
Self-citationRalph, T. C. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.175 · Cited by 32
Multi-particle quantum walks on 3D integrated photonic chip
Zhou, W.-H., Wang, X.-W., Ren, R.-J., Fu, Y.-X., Chang, Y.-J., Xu, X.-Y., Tang, H., & Jin, X.-M. (2024) · Light: Science & Applications · doi:10.1038/s41377-024-01627-7 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Aparo, L., Mataloni, P., Sciarrino, F., Crespi, A., Ramponi, R., & Osellame, R.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2013-03-19
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2041-1723
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 13
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review