The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 3 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Open accessAbstract
An unknown quantum state \ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\varphi}〉 can be disassembled into, then later reconstructed from, purely classical information and purely nonclassical Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) correlations. To do so the sender, ``Alice,'' and the receiver, ``Bob,'' must prearrange the sharing of an EPR-correlated pair of particles. Alice makes a joint measurement on her EPR particle and the unknown quantum system, and sends Bob the classical result of this measurement. Knowing this, Bob can convert the state of his EPR particle into an exact replica of the unknown state \ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\varphi}〉 which Alice destroyed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
20 Own interpretation · 17 No basis given · 3 Sources not found
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An unknown quantum state ]P) can be disassembled into, then later reconstructed from, purely classical information and purely nonclassical Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) correlations.”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, after Alice s measurement, Bob's particle 3 will have been projected into one of the four pure states superposed in Eq. ( 5), according to the measurement outcome.”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each of these possible resultant states for Bob's EPR particle is related in a simple way to the original state IP) which Alice sought to teleport.”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus an accurate teleportation can be achieved in all cases by having Alice tell Bob the classical outcome of her mea- surement, after which Bob applies the required rotation to transform the state of his particle into a replica of IP).”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It follows that, regardless of the unknown state I/i), the four measurement outcomes are equally likely, each occurring with probability 1/4.”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the three other cases, Bob must apply one of the unitary operators in Eq. ( 6), corresponding, respectively, to 180' rotations around the z, x, and y axes, in order to”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plainstates a causen = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Knowing this, Bob can convert the state of his EPR particle into an exact replica of the unknown state ]P) which Alice destroyed.”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Having received these two transmissions, Bob can construct an accurate replica of IP).”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The teleportation of lg) from Alice to Bob has the side effect of producing two bits of random classical information, uncorrelated to lg), which are left behind at the end of the process.”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Then, after teleportation, particles 0 and 3 would be left in a singlet state, even though they had originally belonged to separate EPR pairs.”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 5
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the case of the first (singlet) outcome, Bob's state is the same except for an irrelevant phase factor, so Bob need do nothing further to produce a replica of Alice's spin.”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alice makes a joint measurement on her EPR particle and the unknown quantum system, and sends Bob the classical result of this measurement.”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alice, on the other hand, is left with particles 1 and 2 in one of the states 4~2 ) or IC~~), without any trace of (+) ' (+) the original state I P) .”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“States which are less entangled reduce the fidelity of teleportation, and/or the range of states lg) that can be accurately tele- ported.”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“P) will be reconstructed (in the spin-2 case) as a ran- dom mixture of the four states of Eq. ( 6).”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“It is known that instantaneous information transfer is definitely impossible [3].”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [3] 3. A. Einstein, in Albert Einstein, Philosopher Scientist, - edited by P. A. Schilpp (Library of Living Philosophers, Evanston, 1949) p. 85.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“This”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [5] 5. J. L. Park, Found. Phys. 1, 23 (1970).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, teleportation has the advantage of still being possible in situations where Alice and Bob, after sharing their EPR pairs, have wandered about independently and no longer know each others' locations.”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All of what we have said above can be generalized to systems having N & 2 orthogonal states.”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This diagram is of interest because it can be used to show that a full two bits of classical channel capacity are necessary for accurate tele- portation of a two-state particle (cf.caption).”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although it is currently unfeasible to store separated EPR particles for more than a brief time, if it becomes feasible to do so, quantum teleportation could be quite useful.”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Trying to draw similar”
§ Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels > Abstract
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
If Alice knows beforehand that the unknown state belongs to a given orthonormal set, she can make a measurement whose result will allow her to make an accurate copy.
“Only if Alice knows before- hand that ~qb) belongs to a given orthonormal set can she make a measurement whose result will allow her to make an accurate copy of [P).”
The paper relies on this without support.
If the possibilities for the unknown state include two or more nonorthogonal states, then no measurement will yield sufficient information to prepare a perfectly accurate copy.
“Conversely, if the possibilities for ~P) include two or more nonorthogonal states, then no measurement will yield sufhcient information to prepare a perfectly accurate copy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In general, there is no way to learn the state vector of an unknown quantum system.
“Knowing the state vector ]P) itself would be sufficient information, but in general there is no way to learn it.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Quantum teleportation (Bennett et al., 1993) enables a faithful transfer of an unknown quantum state from one location to another, using entangled states as a quantum channel.”
From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Bennett et al., 1993
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The projection of two photons into a Bell state lies at the heart for many quantum information processing protocols, such as quantum dense coding (Bennett and Wiesner, 1992), quantum teleportation (Bennett et al., 1993), and entanglement swapping ( Żukowski et al., 1993).”
From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Bennett et al., 1993
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“By exploiting entanglement one can efficiently encode classical messages (Bennett and Wiesner, 1992; section VI.A), transfer quantum information to a remote location (Bennett et al., 1993; section VI.B), entangle two remote particles that have no common past ( Żukowski et al., 1993; section VI.C), and purify a large ensemble in a less entangled states into a smaller ensemble with higher”
From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Bennett et al., 1993
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The fascinating possibility of quantum teleportation was discovered by Bennett, Brassard, Crépeau, Jozsa, Peres, and Wootters (1993).”
From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Bennett, Brassard, Crépeau, Jozsa, Peres, and Wootters (1993)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is the case when, as already remarked by Bennett et al. (1993), particle 1 itself is a member of an entangled pair, ultimately leading to entanglement swapping ( Żukowski et al., 1993;Bose et al., 1998).”
From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Bennett et al. (1993)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Some of the promising quantum communication protocols to expand the possibility of classical data transmission in quantum-based systems include quantum key distribution (QKD) [126,127], quantum teleportation [128] and dense coding [129].”
From Quantum Machine Learning for 6G Communication Networks: State-of-the-Art and Vision for the Future (2019) · cites this paper as [129]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“To complete the G min gate set so that we can implement arbitrary quantum computations, it suffices to add HAD and preparation of the state | π/ 8 〉 = cos( π/ 8) | 0 〉 + sin( π/ 8) | 1 〉 . 26, 27”
From Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices (2005) · cites this paper as [26]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Several realizations of the RRDPS protocol have recently been demonstrated experimentally using time-bin phase encoding [103][104][105][106] and using transverse spatial modes [107].”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [107]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Other unique quantum phenomena like 'teleportation' [30] could also be investigated.”
From Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation (1995) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“Since quantum teleportation [14] rests entirely on Bell's Theorem, then this and all research based upon quantum teleportation requires reassessment.”
From EPR Correlations Using Quaternion Spin (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Fortunately, the success probability of the nondeterministic CNOT can be boosted by harnessing quantum teleportation [12]-a process whereby the unknown state of a qubit can be transfered to another qubit.”
From Optical Quantum Computing (2007) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Bennett et al. [1] have suggested that it is possible to transfer the quantum state of a particle onto another particle - the process of quantum teleportation - provided one does not get any information about the state in the course of this transformation.”
From Experimental quantum teleportation (1997) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Quantum physics predicts [1] that once particles 1 and 2 are projected into | ψ -〉 12 , particle 3 is instantaneously projected into the initial state of particle 1.”
From Experimental quantum teleportation (1997) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Although the projection postulate in quantum mechanics seems to bring Alice's attempts to provide Bob with the state | ψ 〉 to a halt, it was realised by Bennett et al. [1] that precisely this projection postulate enables teleportation of | ψ 〉 from Alice to Bob.”
From Experimental quantum teleportation (1997) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“It is now well known that the photons produced via the down-conversion process share nonclassical correlations [7].”
From Ultrabright source of polarization-entangled photons (1999) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Using teleportation, an arbitrary unknown qubit can be faithfully transmitted via a pair of maximally-entangled qubits ( e.g. two spin1 2 particles in a pure singlet state) previously shared between sender and receiver, and a 2-bit classical message from the sender to the receiver.”
From Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels (1996) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“While | φ 3 〉 corresponds to a GHZ state of three qubits [7]”
From Persistent Entanglement in Arrays of Interacting Particles (2001) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Be it in quantum computation [1,2], teleportation [3] or quantum cryptography [4], entanglement is viewed as an important resource and, as such, must be quantified.”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [3]
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem
Ekert, A. K. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.661 · Cited by 10,777
Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880 · Cited by 7,573
Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states
Bennett, C. H., & Wiesner, S. J. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2881 · Cited by 5,470
Self-citationA single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406
Self-citationExperimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers
Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., & Roger, G. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.1804 · Cited by 3,942
Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states
Bennett, C. H. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.3121 · Cited by 3,075
Self-citationRapid solution of problems by quantum computation
Deutsch, D., & Jozsa, R. (1992) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1992.0167 · Cited by 2,700
Self-citationQuantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., & Mermin, N. D. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.557 · Cited by 2,536
Self-citationWiesner, S. (1983) · ACM SIGACT News · doi:10.1145/1008908.1008920 · Cited by 1,520
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- A. Shimony, 1984, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Foundations of Quantum Theory /
- J. S. Bell, 1964, N.Y.), 1, 195
- C. H. Bennett, 1984, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 13,804
Hayashi, M., Iwama, K., Nishimura, H., Raymond, R., & Yamashita, S. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70918-3_52 · Cited by 150
Multiparty secret sharing of quantum information using and identifying Bell states
Zhang, Z. J., Yang, J., Man, Z., & Li, Y. (2005) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2005-00029-5 · Cited by 142
Prior entanglement between senders enables perfect quantum network coding with modification
Hayashi, M. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.040301 · Cited by 138
Separable States Can Be Used To Distribute Entanglement
Cubitt, T. S., Verstraete, F., Dür, W., & Cirac, J. I. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.037902 · Cited by 136
Zeilinger, A., Weihs, G., Jennewein, T. D., & Aspelmeyer, M. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03280 · Cited by 145
A practical architecture for reliable quantum computers
Oskin, M., Chong, F. T., & Chuang, I. L. (2002) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.976922 · Cited by 137
Bell's Theorem without Inequalities and without Probabilities for Two Observers
Cabello, A. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.1911 · Cited by 141
Quantum computing challenges in the software industry. A fuzzy AHP-based approach
Awan, U., Hannola, L., Tandon, A., Goyal, R. K., & Dhir, A. (2022) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2022.106896 · Cited by 163
Classical communication cost and remote preparation of the four-particle GHZ class state
Dai, H., Chen, P., Liang, L.-M., et al. (2006) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2006.02.050 · Cited by 140
Cavity quantum electrodynamics with color centers in diamond
Janitz, E., Bhaskar, M. K., & Childress, L. (2020) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.398628 · Cited by 153
Quantum Algorithm for Distributed Clock Synchronization
Chuang, I. L. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.2006 · Cited by 139
Quantum key distribution without alternative measurements
Cabello, A. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.052312 · Cited by 140
On-chip coherent conversion of photonic quantum entanglement between different degrees of freedom
Feng, L.-T., Zhang, M., Zhou, Z.-Y., Li, M., Xiong, X., Yu, L., Shi, B.-S., Guo, G.-P., Dai, D.-X., Ren, X.-F., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11985 · Cited by 134
Quantum teleportation and Bell’s inequality using single-particle entanglement
Lee, H.-W., & Kim, J. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.63.012305 · Cited by 143
Channel capacities versus entanglement measures in multiparty quantum states
Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.012308 · Cited by 139
Causal and causally separable processes
Oreshkov, O., & Giarmatzi, C. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/9/093020 · Cited by 186
Bipartite entangled non-orthogonal states
Wang, X. (2001) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/35/1/313 · Cited by 139
Quantum-state transmission via a spin ladder as a robust data bus
Li, Y., Shi, T., Chen, B., Song, Z., & Sun, C.-P. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.022301 · Cited by 139
Perseguers, S., Lewenstein, M., Acín, A., & Cirac, J. I. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1665 · Cited by 139
Quantum versus classical domains for teleportation with continuous variables
Braunstein, S. L., Fuchs, C. A., Kimble, H. J., & van Loock, P. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.022321 · Cited by 141
Huber, D., Reindl, M., Aberl, J., Rastelli, A., & Trotta, R. (2018) · Journal of Optics · doi:10.1088/2040-8986/aac4c4 · Cited by 147
Continuous variable remote state preparation
Kurucz, Z., Адам, П., Kis, Z., & Janszky, J. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.052315 · Cited by 136
Quantum Teleportation with a Quantum Dot Single Photon Source
Fattal, D., Diamanti, E., Inoue, K., & Yamamoto, Y. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.037904 · Cited by 138
Takesue, H., Dyer, S. D., Stevens, M. J., Verma, V., Mirin, R. P., & Nam, S. W. (2015) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.2.000832 · Cited by 154
Family of concurrence monotones and its applications
Gour, G. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.012318 · Cited by 135
Li, Y., Li, X., Sang, M.-H., Nie, Y.-Y., & Wang, Z. (2013) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-013-0638-1 · Cited by 138
Maximally Entangled Mixed States: Creation and Concentration
Peters, N. A., Altepeter, J. B., Branning, D., Jeffrey, E. R., Wei, T.-C., & Kwiat, P. G. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.133601 · Cited by 135
Quantum dense coding via a two-mode squeezed-vacuum state
Ban, M. (1999) · Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/1/6/101 · Cited by 136
Multipartite entanglement that is robust against disposal of particles
Dür, W. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.63.020303 · Cited by 137
Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger versus W states: Quantum teleportation through noisy channels
Jung, E., Hwang, M.-R., Ju, Y. H., et al. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.012312 · Cited by 137
Unified derivations of measurement-based schemes for quantum computation
Childs, A. M., Leung, D., & Nielsen, M. A. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.032318 · Cited by 142
Nonlocal memory effects allow perfect teleportation with mixed states
Laine, E.-M., Breuer, H.-P., & Piilo, J. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep04620 · Cited by 134
Multiparticle entanglement purification for two-colorable graph states
Aschauer, H., Dür, W., & Briegel, H. J. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.012319 · Cited by 131
Tsallis entropy and entanglement constraints in multiqubit systems
Kim, J. S. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.062328 · Cited by 132
Infrastructure for the quantum internet
Lloyd, S., Shapiro, J. H., Wong, F. N. C., Kumar, P., Shahriar, M. S., & Yuen, H. P. (2004) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/1039111.1039118 · Cited by 130
All Bipartite Entangled States Are Useful for Information Processing
Masanes, L. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.150501 · Cited by 136
Entanglement in a Valence-Bond Solid State
Fan, H., Korepin, V. E., & Roychowdhury, V. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.227203 · Cited by 139
Optimal teleportation based on bell measurements
Albeverio, S. A., Fei, S.-M., & Yang, W. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.012301 · Cited by 135
Rate-distance tradeoff and resource costs for all-optical quantum repeaters
Pant, M., Krovi, H., Englund, D. R., & Guha, S. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.012304 · Cited by 138
High-Fidelity Quantum Logic Operations Using Linear Optical Elements
Franson, J. D., Donegan, M. M., Fitch, M. J., Jacobs, B. C., & Pittman, T. B. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.137901 · Cited by 91
Chen, S., Yu, W., Zeng, P., & Flammia, S. T. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030348 · Cited by 162
Dynamical creation of entanglement by homodyne-mediated feedback
Wang, J., Wiseman, H. M., & Milburn, G. J. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.042309 · Cited by 133
Entangled photons and quantum communication
Yuan, Z.-S., Bao, X., Lu, C., Zhang, J., Peng, C.-Z., & Pan, J.-W. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.004 · Cited by 134
Generalized teleportation protocol
Gordon, G., & Rigolin, G. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.042309 · Cited by 139
Quantum Entanglement and the Communication Complexity of the Inner Product Function
Cleve, R., van Dam, W., Nielsen, M., & Tapp, A. (1999) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-49208-9_4 · Cited by 133
Yang, Y., & Li, F. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.022315 · Cited by 132
Quantum extension of conditional probability
Cerf, N. J., & Adami, C. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.60.893 · Cited by 136
Approximate transformations and robust manipulation of bipartite pure-state entanglement
Vidal, G., Jonathan, D., & Nielsen, M. A. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.62.012304 · Cited by 139
Fighting noise with noise in realistic quantum teleportation
Fortes, R., & Rigolin, G. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.012338 · Cited by 132
Classifying Directional Gaussian Entanglement, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering, and Discord
He, Q., Gong, Q., & Reid, M. D. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.060402 · Cited by 134
Communicating quantum processes
Gay, S. J., & Nagarajan, R. (2005) · ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL) · doi:10.1145/1040305.1040318 · Cited by 134
Quantum gates by coupled asymmetric quantum dots and controlled-NOT-gate operation
Tanamoto, T. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.022305 · Cited by 139
Rate-loss analysis of an efficient quantum repeater architecture
Guha, S., Krovi, H., Fuchs, C. A., Dutton, Z., Slater, J. A., Simon, C., & Tittel, W. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.022357 · Cited by 142
Continuous Variable Entanglement using Cold Atoms
Josse, V., Dantan, A., Bramati, A., Pinard, M., & Giacobino, E. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.123601 · Cited by 131
Li, Z., Xue, K., Li, J., Chen, L., Li, R., Wang, Z., Yu, N., Wei, D. S. L., Sun, Q., & Lu, J. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3294240 · Cited by 149
SupermarQ: A Scalable Quantum Benchmark Suite
Tomesh, T., Gokhale, P., Omole, V., Ravi, G. S., Smith, K. N., Viszlai, J., Wu, X.-C., Hardavellas, N., Martonosi, M., & Chong, F. T. (2022) · IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) · doi:10.1109/hpca53966.2022.00050 · Cited by 193
“It makes for a useful benchmark for quantum machine performance as it can be applied to computing tasks that demonstrate quantum advantage such as in Shor’s factoring [9], teleportation [45], superdense coding [46], and quantum cryptographic protocols [47].”
MethodQuantum relays for long distance quantum cryptography
Collins, D., Gisin, N., & de Riedmatten, H. (2005) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340412331283633 · Cited by 133
Drone-based entanglement distribution towards mobile quantum networks
Liu, H., Tian, X.-H., Gu, C., Fan, P., Ni, X., Yang, R., Zhang, J.-N., Hu, M., Guo, J. W., Cao, X., et al. (2020) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwz227 · Cited by 146
Machine-Learning-Assisted Many-Body Entanglement Measurement
Gray, J., Banchi, L., Bayat, A., & Bose, S. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.150503 · Cited by 137
Disentanglement in a quantum-critical environment
Sun, Z., Wang, X., & Sun, C. P. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.062312 · Cited by 131
Designing quantum repeater networks
Meter, R. V., & Touch, J. D. (2013) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2013.6576340 · Cited by 133
SeQUeNCe: a customizable discrete-event simulator of quantum networks
Wu, X., Kolar, A., Chung, J., Jin, D., Zhong, T., Kettimuthu, R., & Suchara, M. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac22f6 · Cited by 170
Probabilistic teleportation of a three-particle state via three pairs of entangled particles
Fang, J., Lin, Y., Zhu, S., & Chen, X. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.014305 · Cited by 130
Quantum mechanics as quantum information, mostly
Fuchs, C. A. (2003) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340308234548 · Cited by 632
Generalized measurements by linear elements
Calsamiglia, J. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.030301 · Cited by 122
Bidirectional Controlled Teleportation via Six-Qubit Cluster State
Yan, A. (2013) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-013-1694-0 · Cited by 130
Wu, S., Poulsen, U. V., & Mølmer, K. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.032319 · Cited by 127
Thermal entanglement in two-atom cavity QED and the entangled quantum Otto engine
Wang, H., Liu, S., & He, J. (2009) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.79.041113 · Cited by 128
Generation of a pulsed polarization entangled photon pair using a Sagnac interferometer
Shi, B.-S., & Tomita, A. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.013803 · Cited by 127
Physics of lateral triple quantum-dot molecules with controlled electron numbers
Hsieh, C., Shim, Y.-P., Korkusiński, M., & Hawrylak, P. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/11/114501 · Cited by 128
Multi-user private comparison protocol using GHZ class states
Chang, Y., Tsai, C., & Hwang, T. (2012) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-012-0454-z · Cited by 128
Bidirectional Quantum Controlled Teleportation via a Maximally Seven-qubit Entangled State
Duan, Y.-J., Zha, X.-W., Sun, X.-M., & Xia, J.-F. (2014) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-014-2065-1 · Cited by 128
Optical quantum memory based on electromagnetically induced transparency
Ma, L., Slattery, O., & Tang, X. H. (2017) · Journal of Optics · doi:10.1088/2040-8986/19/4/043001 · Cited by 130
Quantifying the imaginarity of quantum mechanics
Hickey, A., & Gour, G. (2018) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aabe9c · Cited by 141
Devetak, I., Harrow, A. W., & Winter, A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.230504 · Cited by 128
Joint remote preparation of an arbitrary three-qubit state
Luo, M., Chen, X., Ma, S.-Y., Niu, X., & Yang, Y. (2010) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2010.07.043 · Cited by 125
Li, T., & Yin, Z.-Q. (2016) · 中国科学通报：英文版 · doi:10.1007/s11434-015-0990-x · Cited by 137
Qubit Teleportation and Transfer across Antiferromagnetic Spin Chains
Venuti, L. C., Boschi, C. D. E., & Roncaglia, M. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.060401 · Cited by 127
Teleportation of coherent-state superpositions within a network
An, N. B. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.022321 · Cited by 124
Robustness of non-Abelian holonomic quantum gates against parametric noise
Solinas, P., Paolo Zanardi, A., & Zanghı̀, N. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.042316 · Cited by 121
Probabilistic Quantum TeleportationPreprint
Agrawal, P., & Pati, A. K. (2002) · Cited by 132
Continuous entanglement distribution over a transnational 248 km fiber link
Neumann, S. P., Büchner, A., Bulla, L., Bohmann, M., & Ursin, R. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33919-0 · Cited by 145
Purifying Noisy Entanglement Requires Collective Measurements
Linden, N., Massar, S., & Popescu, S. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3279 · Cited by 121
Secure Quantum Steganography Protocol for Fog Cloud Internet of Things
El‐Latif, A. A. A., Abd-El-Atty, B., Hossain, M. S., Elmougy, S., & Ghoneim, A. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2799879 · Cited by 129
The Quantum Reverse Shannon Theorem Based on One-Shot Information Theory
Berta, M., Christandl, M., & Renner, R. (2011) · reroDoc Digital Library · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000038997 · Cited by 119
Quantum entanglement as a quantifiable resource
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.1998.0244 · Cited by 131
Self-citationEfficient high-capacity quantum secret sharing with two-photon entanglement
Deng, F., Li, X., & Zhou, H.-Y. (2007) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2007.10.066 · Cited by 125
The Structure of Bipartite Quantum States - Insights from Group Theory and CryptographyPreprint
Christandl, M. (2006) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0604183 · Cited by 188
Optimizing type-I polarization-entangled photons
Rangarajan, R., Goggin, M. E., & Kwiat, P. G. (2009) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.17.018920 · Cited by 123
General form of genuine multipartite entanglement quantum channels for teleportation
Chen, P.-X., Zhu, S.-Y., & Guo, G. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.032324 · Cited by 123
Communication complexity lower bounds by polynomials
Buhrman, H., & de Wolf, R. (2002) · IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC) · doi:10.1109/ccc.2001.933879 · Cited by 132
Long-Range Entanglement from Measuring Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases
Tantivasadakarn, N., Thorngren, R., Vishwanath, A., & Verresen, R. (2024) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.021040 · Cited by 219
Entanglement Swapping between Discrete and Continuous Variables
Takeda, S., Fuwa, M., van Loock, P., & Furusawa, A. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.100501 · Cited by 116
One-Shot Rates for Entanglement Manipulation Under Non-entangling Maps
Brandão, F. G. S. L., & Datta, N. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2011.2104531 · Cited by 110
In Defence of Naiveté: The Conceptual Status of Lagrangian Quantum Field Theory
Wallace, D. J. (2006) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-004-6248-9 · Cited by 149
Towards quantum communications in free-space seawater
Ji, L., Gao, J., Yang, A.-L., Feng, Z., Lin, X.-F., Li, Z.-G., & Jin, X.-M. (2017) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.25.019795 · Cited by 138
Kuang, L., & Zhou, L. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.043606 · Cited by 119
Faithful qubit transmission against collective noise without ancillary qubits
Li, X.-H., Deng, F.-G., & Zhou, H.-Y. (2007) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.2794433 · Cited by 137
Beigi, S., & König, R. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/9/093036 · Cited by 121
Quantum-dot single-photon sources for the quantum internet
Lu, C., & Pan, J.-W. (2021) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-021-01033-9 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K.
- Affiliations
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1993-03-29
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1895-1899
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978553093
- Cited by
- 13,703
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 437 · 2025: 724 · 2024: 696 · 2023: 708 · 2022: 628 · 2021: 640 · 2020: 571 · 2019: 598 · 2018: 477 · 2017: 497 · 2016: 545 · 2015: 500 · 2014: 492 · 2013: 526 · 2012: 492
- FWCI
- 42.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- quantum teleportation, unknown quantum states, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations, EPR pairs, classical information, joint measurement, quantum state tomography, quantum entanglement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
