Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental Violation of a Spin-1 Bell Inequality Using Maximally Entangled Four-Photon States

Open access
Howell, John C., Lamas-Linares, Antia, Bouwmeester, Dik·2002·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We demonstrate the experimental violation of a spin-1 Bell inequality. The spin-1 inequality is based on the Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt formalism. For entangled spin-1 particles, the maximum quantum-mechanical prediction is 2.55 as opposed to a maximum of 2, predicted using local hidden variables. We obtained an experimental value of 2.27+/-0.02 using the four-photon state generated by pulsed, type-II, stimulated parametric down-conversion. This is a violation of the spin-1 Bell inequality by more than 13 standard deviations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.88.030401

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. D. Bohm, 1951, Quantum Theory
  2. J. S. Bell, 1965, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.), 1, 195
  3. 10.1088/0034-4885/41/12/002 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.460 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5039 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.R773 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4733 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4729 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4737 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4418 · DOI · Paper page
  11. B. S. Cirel'son, 1980, Lett. Math. Phys., 4, 93, 10.1007/BF00417500 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.901 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3336 · DOI
  14. K. Wodkiewicz, 1994, Acta Phys. Pol. A, 86, 223, 10.12693/APhysPolA.86.223 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.4959 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5239 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/35085529 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3313 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012306 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1407 · DOI

Cited by

See all 203

Metadata

Authors
Howell, J. C., Lamas-Linares, A., & Bouwmeester, D.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2002-01-03
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
030401-030401
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1965620143
Cited by
203
References
17
FWCI
12.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental Violation of a Spin-1 Bell Inequality Using Maximally Entangled Four-Photon States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.88.030401
The paper
Howell, J. C., Lamas-Linares, A., & Bouwmeester, D. (2002). Experimental Violation of a Spin-1 Bell Inequality Using Maximally Entangled Four-Photon States. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.88.030401

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.