The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental Nonlinear Sign Shift for Linear Optics Quantum Computation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
None of the previously demonstrated quantum logic gates inspired by the KLM approach used the original KLM proposal of a simple measurement-induced nonlinearity.
“While a number of quantum logic gates inspired by the KLM approach have been demonstrated [17-24], none of these gates used the original KLM proposal of a simple measurement induced nonlinearity: either the gates are not heralded (the resultant output photons themselves have to be measured and destroyed) or rely on additional entanglement effects”
From Realization of a Knill-Laflamme-Milburn controlled-NOT photonic quantum circuit combining effective optical nonlinearities (2011) · cites this paper as [19]
A measurement-induced nonlinearity has been verified by a conditional phase shift.
“While a measurement induced nonlinearity has been verified by a conditional phase shift [19]”
From Realization of a Knill-Laflamme-Milburn controlled-NOT photonic quantum circuit combining effective optical nonlinearities (2011) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880
Experimental quantum teleportation
Bouwmeester, D., Pan, J.-W., Mattle, K., Eibl, M., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37539 · Cited by 5,545
Self-citationMeasurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369
Elementary gates for quantum computation
Barenco, A., Bennett, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J. A., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.3457 · Cited by 4,311
New High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs
Kwiat, P. G., Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., Sergienko, A. V., & Shih, Y. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4337 · Cited by 3,102
Self-citationGottesman, D., & Chuang, I. L. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46503 · Cited by 1,860
Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device
Santori, C., Fattal, D., Vučković, J., Solomon, G. S., & Yamamoto, Y. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01086 · Cited by 1,559
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.3489 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2124 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.012314 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.030301 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062311 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.064305 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.024308 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.040301 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4087 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.147901 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4435 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.017903 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature01623 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.290 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.290.5500.2282 · DOI
- 10.1038/35035032 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.123404 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.123482 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410
“So far, various quantum computation primitives have been demonstrated with photons alone–including conditional phase shift operations (Sanaka et al., 2004), and destructive (Pittman et al., 2002, 2003; O’Brien et al., 2003) and even non-destructive CNOT gates (Gasparoni et al., 2004; Zhao et al.,…”
BackgroundSelf-citationExperimental one-way quantum computing
Walther, P., Resch, K. J., Rudolph, T., Schenck, E., Weinfurter, H., Vedral, V., Aspelmeyer, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03347 · Cited by 1,273
“These schemes utilize sequences of probabilistic quantum-logic gates 8,20-23 based on linear optical elements to construct large photonic cluster states 24,25 .”
MethodSelf-citationQuantum optical metrology – the lowdown on high-N00N states
Dowling, J. P. (2008) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107510802091298 · Cited by 894
Optical Quantum Computation Using Cluster States
Nielsen, M. A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.040503 · Cited by 614
Laser written waveguide photonic quantum circuits
Marshall, G. D., Politi, A., Matthews, J. C. F., Dekker, P., Ams, M., Withford, M. J., & O'Brien, J. L. (2009) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.17.012546 · Cited by 308
Linear Optics Controlled-Phase Gate Made Simple
Kiesel, N., Schmid, C., Weber, U., Ursin, R., & Weinfurter, H. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.210505 · Cited by 296
Quantum computing using single photons and the Zeno effect
Franson, J. D., Jacobs, B. C., & Pittman, T. B. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.062302 · Cited by 192
Fault-tolerant quantum computation with cluster states
Nielsen, M. A., & Dawson, C. M. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.042323 · Cited by 161
Noise Thresholds for Optical Quantum Computers
Dawson, C. M., Haselgrove, H. L., & Nielsen, M. A. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.020501 · Cited by 127
Okamoto, R., O’Brien, J. L., Hofmann, H. F., & Takeuchi, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1018839108 · Cited by 92
Noise thresholds for optical cluster-state quantum computation
Dawson, C. M., Haselgrove, H. L., & Nielsen, M. A. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.052306 · Cited by 79
Classical characterization of biphoton correlation in waveguide lattices
Keil, R., Dreisow, F., Heinrich, M., Tünnermann, A., Nolte, S., & Szameit, A. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.013808 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanaka, K., Jennewein, T., Pan, J.-W., Resch, K., & Zeilinger, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2004-01-09
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- 1079-7114
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
