The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimizing Linear Optics Quantum Gates
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The NS_N gate defined by Eq. 28 can be implemented with probability 1/N^2.
“can be implemented with probability 1/N 2 [see also Scheel and Audenaert (2005)].”
From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Eisert (2005)
The paper’s non-linear sign-shift discussion (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) establishes an achievable optimal probability of 1/4 for N=2. For the three-photon gate, it gives only an upper bound of 1/9. These cases do not establish that the NS_N gate can be implemented with probability 1/N² for arbitrary N. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C., & Branning, D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02054 · Cited by 992
Resource-Efficient Linear Optical Quantum Computation
Browne, D. E., & Rudolph, T. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.010501 · Cited by 790
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1038/35051009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.064303 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.257902 · DOI
- A. B. U’Ren, 2003, Quantum Inf. Comput., 3, 480, 10.26421/QIC3.s-3 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.037903 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.040503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.060310 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.013810 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.012312 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/051 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1464-4266/6/1/L01 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.031806 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.032310 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.217902 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.097901 · DOI
- 10.1109/18.959270 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.060301 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.022308 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.062317 · DOI
- 10.1137/1038003 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.250502 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.062302 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.012302 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Novel Schemes for Measurement-Based Quantum Computation
Gross, D., & Eisert, J. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.220503 · Cited by 255
Self-citationMeasurement-based quantum computation beyond the one-way model
Gross, D., Eisert, J., Schuch, N., & Perez-Garcia, D. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.052315 · Cited by 236
Self-citationPercolation, Renormalization, and Quantum Computing with Nondeterministic Gates
Kieling, K., Rudolph, T., & Eisert, J. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.130501 · Cited by 121
Self-citationOptical generation of matter qubit graph states
Benjamin, S. C., Eisert, J., & Stace, T. M. (2005) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/194 · Cited by 50
Self-citationCluster state preparation using gates operating at arbitrary success probabilities
Kieling, K., Gross, D., & Eisert, J. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/200 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Eisert, J.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-07-22
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- 1079-7114
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
