The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 8 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis
Open accessAbstract
We demonstrate a new architecture for an optical entangling gate that is significantly simpler than previous realizations, using partially polarizing beam splitters so that only a single optical mode-matching condition is required. We demonstrate operation of a controlled-z gate in both continuous-wave and pulsed regimes of operation, fully characterizing it in each case using quantum process tomography. We also demonstrate a fully resolving, nondeterministic optical Bell-state analyzer based on this controlled-z gate. This new architecture is ideally suited to guided optics implementations of optical gates.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper demonstrates a simplified optical entangling controlled-z gate using partially-polarising beamsplitters, requiring only one nonclassical mode-matching condition and no classical interferometers. It fully characterizes the gate in continuous-wave and pulsed regimes and uses it as a nondeterministic Bell-state analyser.
Key findings
- The PPBS controlled-z gate uses three partially-polarising beamsplitters, two half-wave plates, no classical interferometers, and no ancilla photons; the controlled-z operation succeeds with probability 1/9 and is heralded by one photon in each output.
- Quantum process tomography gives CW and pulsed process fidelities of 74.6±0.3% and 84.0±0.1%, and average gate fidelities of 79.7±0.2% and 87.2±0.1%; with modelled single-qubit unitary corrections these rise to 77.0±0.3% and 86.6±0.2% process fidelity, and 81.6±0.2% and 89.3±0.1% average gate fidelity.
- As a Bell-state analyser, the average fidelity of measured output states with separable states is 79±3%, and the directly measured average probability of success is 78±3%.
- The pulsed-gate PPBS reflectivities were η = 0.28, 0.28, and 0.29 (±0.01); modelling a gate with 0.28 reflectivities gives an optimum process fidelity of 96%, indicating the gate is relatively forgiving of exact splitting ratios.
Methods
- Photon pairs were generated by spontaneous parametric downconversion in a BBO crystal using both continuous-wave and femtosecond-pulsed sources, collected into single-mode fibers, and injected into the PPBS controlled-z gate; a coincidence window of ∼5 ns was used with no correction for accidental counts.
- The gate was characterized by quantum process tomography in both CW and pulsed regimes, using process fidelity and average gate fidelity metrics.
- The Bell-state analyser was tested with entangled CW input states, including the four maximally entangled states |ψ′± and |φ′±, using quantum state tomography and a directly measured truth table.
Limitations
- The paper states that PPBS beamsplitting ratios are fixed at manufacture, unlike schemes where a half-wave plate sets effective reflectivity; performance is limited almost exclusively by mode matching, primarily spatial.
- The paper reports systematic fixed rotations of input and output polarisations, probably from birefringent effects in non-ideal PPBSs, which could be compensated with wave plates.
- The Bell measurement is nondeterministic, and the paper notes that a protocol using this gate would be less efficient than ordinary classical communication; the measured output Bell states are unentangled but somewhat mixed (average linear entropy SL = 0.42 ± 0.07).
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 8 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“by comparing the two we find that temporal mode mismatch was not a significant factor in the gate's performance.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Their average tangle, T = 0.04 ± 0.05, and linear entropy, SL = 0.42 ± 0.07, indicates that they are unentangled, albeit somewhat mixed.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In our experiment, we observed systematic, fixed rotations of the input and output polarisations, probably due to birefringent effects in non-ideal PPBSs.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also demonstrate a fully-resolving, nondeterministic optical Bell-state analyser based on this controlled-z gate.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · boosted
“we also demonstrate the use of this kind of gate for fully-resolving Bell measurements.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The four Bell states can be discriminated by the cz gate after a Hadamard rotation.
- Rests on an assumption: An ideal cz gate takes the four maximally entangled states |ψ′±, |φ′± to the four separable orthogonal states |DD, |AD, |DA, and |AA respectively.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · boosted
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The circuit of Fig. 1(b) therefore performs a cz gate with additional x gates on the control and target qubits.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the cw case, the major deviation from ideal operation is the larger than expected ii term (0.36 instead of 0.25).”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Modelling a gate using 0.28 reflectivities, we find the optimum process fidelity that can be obtained is F 0.28 P = 96%-near ideal.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In fact, they are close to the four orthogonal separable states (|H ± e iϕ1 |V ) ⊗ (|H ± e iϕ2 |V ), where ϕ 1 = -3.07 and ϕ 2 = 0.32 as determined by a best fit.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: An ideal cz gate takes the four maximally entangled states |ψ′±, |φ′± to the four separable orthogonal states |DD, |AD, |DA, and |AA respectively.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We demonstrate operation of a controlled-z gate in both continuous-wave and pulsed regimes of operation, fully characterising it in each case using quantum process tomography.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · boosted
“We demonstrate the operation of this type of gate using photons generated both by continuous-wave (CW) and by femtosecond pulsed parametric downconversion”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Abstract · boosted
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here we take an alternative approach which does not require interferometric stability.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“The key advantage of the PPBS gate is that the polarisation modes are never spatially separated and recombined, and consequently no classical interference conditions are required.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- It may state two separate claims as one. 15
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to the geometry of the source, and birefringence and geometric effects in the single mode fibers, the near-maximally entangled state produced is of the form |HH + e iϕ |V V .”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“The tangle T = 0.93 ± 0.01 and linear entropy S L = 0.05 ± 0.01 show that this state is highly entangled and highly pure, the fidelity with a maximally entangled state is F = 98.0 ± 0.4%.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
In the paper
“The CW and pulsed gates have process fidelities of 74.6±0.3% and 84.0±0.1% respectively; and average gate fidelities of 79.7±0.2% and 87.2±0.1% [20].”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The four experimentally produced density matrices are shown in Fig. 3(e): the average of their fidelities is F = 95.8 ± 0.7%; the average of the tangles and linear entropies are T = 0.94 ± 0.02 and SL = 0.04 ± 0.01, respectively.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To demonstrate this, we modelled their effect numerically, identifying single qubit unitary corrections which increased the CW and pulsed process fidelities to 77.0±0.3% and 86.6±0.2%respectively; and average gate fidelities to 81.6±0.2% and 89.3±0.1%.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The CW and pulsed gates have process fidelities of 74.6±0.3% and 84.0±0.1% respectively; and average gate fidelities of 79.7±0.2% and 87.2±0.1% [20].”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the PPBSs for the CW gate (optimized for 702.2 nm) were measured to be within ±0.01 of the required reflectivities, for the pulsed gate (820 nm), the values for the three PPBSs were η = 0.28, 0.28 and 0.29 (±0.01; normalised to output power).”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Despite more stringent temporal modematching requirements in the pulsed regime, the extra spatial filtering led to better gate operation, equivalent to the previous best demonstration [7].”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The average of the fidelities between all combinations of the measured output states is 24 ± 5% (ideally zero), demonstrating that the states are close to orthogonal.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results are shown in Fig. 3(c), and the average probability of success is 78 ± 3%, in agreement with the tomography results.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The four Bell states can be discriminated by the cz gate after a Hadamard rotation.
- Rests on an assumption: An ideal cz gate takes the four maximally entangled states |ψ′±, |φ′± to the four separable orthogonal states |DD, |AD, |DA, and |AA respectively.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The average fidelity of the measured output states with the above separable states is F = 79 ± 3%: if we analyzed the output of the circuit in this rotated basis, we would correctly identify the Bell-state with a probability of 79%.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As originally anticipated in Ref. [13], the cz gate is relatively forgiving of the exact splitting ratios-making it an eminently suitable gate to be realised with a PPBS architecture.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This cz gate is the simplest entangling (or dis-entangling) linear optics gate realized to date, requiring only three partially-polarising beam splitters (PPBSs), two half-wave plates, no classical interferometers, and no ancilla photons.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is nondeterministic and success is heralded by detection of a single photon in each of the outputs.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Finally, we have demonstrated the operation of this gate as a Bell-state analyser which has the advantage of higher success probability and no ancillae compared to alternative recent demonstrations [9,27].”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] source
- Not checked yetcites [27]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In practice, these have no effect on gate quality and, if necessary, could be compensated for with appropriate wave plates.”
§ Demonstration of a Simple Entangling Optical Gate and Its Use in Bell-State Analysis > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The short pump pulses in pulsed parametric downconversion lead to more stringent temporal mode-matching requirements.
“However, the short pump pulses lead to a larger bandwidth of downconverted photons, and to more stringent temporal mode-matching requirements.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The four Bell states can be discriminated by the cz gate after a Hadamard rotation.
“These are just the usual four Bell states, with the second qubit rotated by a Hadamard so that they can be discriminated by the cz gate.”
The paper relies on this without support.
An ideal cz gate takes the four maximally entangled states |ψ′±, |φ′± to the four separable orthogonal states |DD, |AD, |DA, and |AA respectively.
“An ideal cz gate would take the four maximally entangled states |ψ ′± , |φ ′± to the four separable orthogonal states: |DD , |AD , |DA , and |AA respectively.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“An even simpler set-up becomes possible with polarization encoding (Kiesel et al., 2005b;Langford et al., 2005;Okamoto et al., 2005) which in turn could be already applied, e.g., to observe cluster states for one-way quantum computing (see below, Kiesel et al., 2005a).”
From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Langford et al., 2005
In the citing paper
“These results show that we have near-ideal algorithm performance, far better than we have any right to expect given the known errors inherent in the logic gates [8,29].”
From Experimental Demonstration of a Compiled Version of Shor’s Algorithm with Quantum Entanglement (2007) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“We use a pair of compact optical gates [8,9,10], Fig 2c),e), each operating on a dependent pair of photons, resulting in measured visibilities for both of V r =98±2%.”
From Experimental Demonstration of a Compiled Version of Shor’s Algorithm with Quantum Entanglement (2007) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880
Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states
Bennett, C. H., & Wiesner, S. J. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2881 · Cited by 5,470
James, D. F. V., Kwiat, P. G., Munro, W. J., & White, A. G. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052312 · Cited by 2,176
Self-citationGottesman, D., & Chuang, I. L. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46503 · Cited by 1,860
Dense Coding in Experimental Quantum Communication
Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Kwiat, P. G., & Zeilinger, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.4656 · Cited by 1,342
Ultrabright source of polarization-entangled photons
Kwiat, P. G., Waks, E., White, A. G., Appelbaum, I., & Eberhard, P. H. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.60.r773 · Cited by 1,142
Self-citationDemonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C., & Branning, D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02054 · Cited by 992
Self-citationOptical Quantum Computation Using Cluster States
Nielsen, M. A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.040503 · Cited by 614
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410
Silica-on-silicon waveguide quantum circuits
Politi, A., Cryan, M. J., Rarity, J. G., Yu, S., & O'Brien, J. L. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155441 · Cited by 1,084
Self-citationExperimental Quantum Computing without Entanglement
Lanyon, B. P., Barbieri, M., Almeida, M. P., & White, A. G. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.200501 · Cited by 874
Self-citationSimplifying quantum logic using higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces
Lanyon, B. P., Barbieri, M., de Almeida, M. P., Jennewein, T. D., Ralph, T. C., Resch, K. J., Pryde, G. J., O’Brien, J. L., Gilchrist, A., & White, A. G. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1150 · Cited by 762
Self-citationOn-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability
He, Y.-M., He, Y., Wei, Y.-J., Wu, D., Atatüre, M., Schneider, C., Höfling, S., Kamp, M., Lu, C.-Y., & Pan, J.-W. (2013) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.262 · Cited by 559
Experimental EPR-steering using Bell-local states
Saunders, D. J., Jones, S. J., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1766 · Cited by 446
Self-citationPolino, E., Valeri, M., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2020) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0007577 · Cited by 443
Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion
Walborn, S. P., Monken, C. H., Pádua, S., & Ribeiro, P. H. S. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.06.003 · Cited by 406
Integrated photonic quantum gates for polarization qubits
Crespi, A., Ramponi, R., Osellame, R., Sansoni, L., Bongioanni, I., Sciarrino, F., Vallone, G., & Mataloni, P. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1570 · Cited by 351
Experimental Demonstration of a Compiled Version of Shor’s Algorithm with Quantum Entanglement
Lanyon, B. P., Weinhold, T. J., Langford, N. K., Barbieri, M., James, D. F. V., Gilchrist, A., & White, A. G. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.250505 · Cited by 327
Self-citationQuantum feedback: Theory, experiments, and applications
Zhang, J., Liu, Y.-X., Wu, R.-B., Jacobs, K., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.02.003 · Cited by 346
Violation of the Leggett–Garg inequality with weak measurements of photons
Goggin, M. E., de Almeida, M. P., Barbieri, M., Lanyon, B. P., O’Brien, J. L., White, A. G., & Pryde, G. J. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1005774108 · Cited by 305
Self-citationExperimental generation of single photons via active multiplexing
Ma, X., Zotter, S., Kofler, J., Jennewein, T. D., & Zeilinger, A. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.043814 · Cited by 209
Politi, A., Matthews, J., Thompson, M. G., & O'Brien, J. L. (2009) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/jstqe.2009.2026060 · Cited by 196
Self-citationQuantum control gates with weak cross-Kerr nonlinearity
Lin, Q., & Li, J. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.022301 · Cited by 171
Quantum computing on encrypted data
Fisher, K. A. G., Broadbent, A., Shalm, L. K., Yan, Z., Lavoie, J., Prevedel, R., Jennewein, T., & Resch, K. J. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4074 · Cited by 157
Self-citationLinear optical quantum computing in a single spatial mode
Humphreys, P. C., Metcalf, B. J., Spring, J. B., Moore, M., Jin, X.-M., Barbieri, M., Kolthammer, W. S., & Walmsley, I. A. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.150501 · Cited by 145
Experimental Feedback Control of Quantum Systems Using Weak Measurements
Gillett, G., Dalton, R. B., Lanyon, B. P., de Almeida, M. P., Barbieri, M., Pryde, G. J., O’Brien, J. L., Resch, K. J., Bartlett, S. D., & White, A. G. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.080503 · Cited by 154
Self-citationPhase-controlled integrated photonic quantum circuits
Smith, B. J., Kundys, D. O., Thomas-Peter, N. L., Smith, P. G. R., & Walmsley, I. A. (2009) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.17.013516 · Cited by 140
White, A. G., Gilchrist, A., Pryde, G. J., O’Brien, J. L., Bremner, M. J., & Langford, N. K. (2007) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.24.000172 · Cited by 134
Self-citationSpontaneous Parametric Down‐Conversion Sources for Multiphoton Experiments
Zhang, C., Huang, Y., Liu, B., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2021) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202000132 · Cited by 139
Experimental Joint Quantum Measurements with Minimum Uncertainty
Ringbauer, M., Biggerstaff, D. N., Broome, M. A., Fedrizzi, A., Branciard, C., & White, A. G. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.020401 · Cited by 122
Self-citationYamamoto, T., Neeley, M., Lucero, E. A., Bialczak, R. C., Kelly, J., Lenander, M., Mariantoni, M., O’Connell, A. D., Sank, D., Wang, H., et al. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.184515 · Cited by 112
Linear-optics quantum Toffoli and Fredkin gates
Fiurášek, J. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.062313 · Cited by 108
Pedagogical Review of Quantum Measurement Theory with an Emphasis on Weak Measurements
Svensson, B. E. Y. (2013) · Quanta · doi:10.12743/quanta.v2i1.12 · Cited by 104
A two-qubit photonic quantum processor and its application to solving systems of linear equations
Barz, S., Kassal, I., Ringbauer, M., Lipp, Y. O., Dakić, B., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Walther, P. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep06115 · Cited by 100
Integrated-optics heralded controlled-NOT gate for polarization-encoded qubits
Zeuner, J., Sharma, A. N., Tillmann, M., Heilmann, R., Gräfe, M., Moqanaki, A., Szameit, A., & Walther, P. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0068-0 · Cited by 95
Okamoto, R., O’Brien, J. L., Hofmann, H. F., & Takeuchi, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1018839108 · Cited by 92
Self-citationDemonstration of a Quantum Controlled-NOT Gate in the Telecommunications Band
Chen, J., Altepeter, J. B., Medić, M., Lee, K. F., Gökden, B., Hadfield, R. H., Nam, S. W., & Kumar, P. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.133603 · Cited by 95
High-fidelity operation of quantum photonic circuits
Laing, A., Peruzzo, A., Politi, A., Verde, M. R., Halder, M., Ralph, T. C., Thompson, M. G., & O’Brien, J. L. (2010) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3497087 · Cited by 92
Self-citationOkamoto, R., O'Brien, J. L., Hofmann, H. F., Nagata, T., Sasaki, K., & Takeuchi, S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1167182 · Cited by 79
Self-citationJennewein, T., Barbieri, M., & White, A. G. (2011) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340.2010.546894 · Cited by 88
Self-citationContinuous-variable quantum computation with spatial degrees of freedom of photons
Tasca, D. S., Gomes, R. M., Toscano, F., Ribeiro, P. H. S., & Walborn, S. P. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.052325 · Cited by 96
Experimental quantum process tomography of non-trace-preserving maps
Bongioanni, I., Sansoni, L., Sciarrino, F., Vallone, G., & Mataloni, P. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.042307 · Cited by 79
Ralph, T. C., & Pryde, G. J. (2009) · Progress in optics · doi:10.1016/s0079-6638(10)05409-0 · Cited by 80
Self-citationOptical Nondestructive Controlled-NOT Gate without Using Entangled Photons
Bao, X.-H., Chen, T.-Y., Zhang, Q., Yang, J., Zhang, H., Yang, T., & Pan, J.-W. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.170502 · Cited by 79
High-fidelity photonic quantum logic gate based on near-optimal Rydberg single-photon source
Shi, S., Xu, B., Zhang, K., Ye, G.-S., Xiang, D.-S., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Su, D., & Li, L. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32083-9 · Cited by 73
Reducing multi-photon rates in pulsed down-conversion by temporal multiplexing
Broome, M. A., de Almeida, M. P., Fedrizzi, A., & White, A. G. (2011) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.19.022698 · Cited by 70
Self-citationExperimental realization of a quantum game on a one-way quantum computer
Prevedel, R., Stefanov, A., Walther, P. J., & Zeilinger, A. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/205 · Cited by 69
Self-citationExperimental Distribution of Entanglement with Separable Carriers
Fedrizzi, A., Zuppardo, M., Gillett, G., Broome, M. A., de Almeida, M. P., Paternostro, M., White, A. G., & Paterek, T. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.230504 · Cited by 68
Self-citationTeleportation-based realization of an optical quantum two-qubit entangling gate
Gao, W.-B., Goebel, A., Lu, C., Dai, H.-N., Wagenknecht, C., Zhang, Q., Zhao, B., Peng, C.-Z., Chen, Z., Chen, Y.-A., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1005720107 · Cited by 70
Characterizing Quantum Dynamics with Initial System-Environment Correlations
Ringbauer, M., Wood, C. J., Modi, K. K., Gilchrist, A., White, A. G., & Fedrizzi, A. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.090402 · Cited by 67
Self-citationRecent progress in single-photon and entangled-photon generation and applications
Takeuchi, S. (2014) · Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.7567/jjap.53.030101 · Cited by 68
All-optical-fiber polarization-based quantum logic gate
Clark, A. S., Fulconis, J., Rarity, J. G., Wadsworth, W. J., & O’Brien, J. L. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.030303 · Cited by 65
Self-citationEfficient Experimental Estimation of Fidelity of Linear Optical Quantum Toffoli Gate
Mičuda, M., Sedlák, M., Straka, I., Miková, M., Dušek, M., Ježek, M., & Fiurášek, J. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.160407 · Cited by 65
Bridging thermodynamics and metrology in nonequilibrium quantum thermometry
Cavina, V., Mancino, L., Pasquale, A. D., Gianani, I., Sbroscia, M., Booth, R. I., Roccia, E., Raimondi, R., Giovannetti, V., & Barbieri, M. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.050101 · Cited by 65
Low-Cost Fredkin Gate with Auxiliary Space
Liu, W., Wei, H., & Kwek, L. C. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.054057 · Cited by 66
A 14 × 14 μm2 footprint polarization-encoded quantum controlled-NOT gate based on hybrid waveguide
Wang, S. M., Cheng, Q., Gong, Y.-X., Xu, P., Sun, C., Li, L., Li, T., & Zhu, S. N. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11490 · Cited by 61
Entangling Quantum-Logic Gate Operated with an Ultrabright Semiconductor Single-Photon Source
Gazzano, O., de Almeida, M. P., Nowak, A. K., Portalupi, S. L., Lemaître, A., Sagnes, I., White, A. G., & Senellart, P. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.250501 · Cited by 61
Self-citationEntangling measurements for multiparameter estimation with two qubits
Roccia, E., Gianani, I., Mancino, L., Sbroscia, M., Somma, F., Genoni, M. G., & Barbieri, M. (2017) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aa9212 · Cited by 61
Implementation of a nonlocal N -qubit conditional phase gate by single-photon interference
Deng, Z. J., Zhang, X., Wei, H., Gao, K., & Feng, M. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.044305 · Cited by 59
On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability
He, Y., He, Y., Wei, Y.-J., Wu, D., Atatüre, M., Schneider, C., Höfling, S., Kamp, M., Lu, C., & Pan, J.-W. (2012) · International Photonics and Optoelectronics Meetings · doi:10.1364/iont.2012.if1a.3 · Cited by 55
Linear optical Fredkin gate based on partial-SWAP gate
Fiurášek, J. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.032317 · Cited by 54
Experimental Implementation of the Optimal Linear-Optical Controlled Phase Gate
Lemr, K., Černoch, A., Soubusta, J., Kieling, K., Eisert, J., & Dušek, M. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.013602 · Cited by 54
Linear optical scheme for direct implementation of a nondestructive N -qubit controlled phase gate
Zou, X., Li, K., & Guo, G. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.044305 · Cited by 54
Wang, C., Zhang, Y., Jiao, R., & Jin, G.-S. (2013) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.21.019252 · Cited by 52
Supercompact Photonic Quantum Logic Gate on a Silicon Chip
Zhang, M., Feng, L., Li, M., Yang, C., Zhang, L., He, D., Guo, G., Guo, G., Ren, X., & Daoxin Dai, A. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.130501 · Cited by 53
Linear-optics-based entanglement concentration of unknown partially entangled three-photon W states
Wang, H., Zhang, S., & Yeon, K.-H. (2010) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.27.002159 · Cited by 47
Experimentally modeling stochastic processes with less memory by the use of a quantum processor
Palsson, M. S., Gu, M., Ho, J., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601302 · Cited by 48
Self-citationToward optical quantum information processing with quantum dots coupled to microstructures [Invited]
Gazzano, O., & Solomon, G. S. (2016) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.33.00c160 · Cited by 47
Heralded Nondestructive Quantum Entangling Gate with Single-Photon Sources
Li, J.-P., Gu, X., Qin, J., Wu, D., You, X., Wang, H., Schneider, C., Höfling, S., Huo, Y.-H., Lu, C., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.140501 · Cited by 51
Lu, H., Chen, L.-K., Liu, C., Xu, P., Yao, X.-C., Li, L., Liu, N.-L., Zhao, B., Chen, Y.-A., & Pan, J.-W. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.81 · Cited by 46
Experimental Realization of Linear-Optical Partial swap Gates
Černoch, A., Soubusta, J., Bartůšková, L., Dušek, M., & Fiurášek, J. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.180501 · Cited by 46
Intrinsically narrowband pair photon generation in microstructured fibres
Clark, A., Bell, B., Fulconis, J., Halder, M. M., Cemlyn, B. R., Alibart, O., Xiong, C., Wadsworth, W. J., & Rarity, J. G. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/6/065009 · Cited by 47
Experimental simulation of closed timelike curves
Ringbauer, M., Broome, M. A., Myers, C. R., White, A. G., & Ralph, T. C. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5145 · Cited by 48
Self-citationQuantum teleportation and entanglement swapping with linear optics logic gates
Schmid, C., Kiesel, N., Weber, U. K., Ursin, R., Zeilinger, A., & Weinfurter, H. (2009) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/11/3/033008 · Cited by 47
Hardy’s Paradox and Violation of a State-Independent Bell Inequality in Time
Fedrizzi, A., de Almeida, M. P., Broome, M. A., White, A. G., & Barbieri, M. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.200402 · Cited by 46
Self-citationQuantum wave–particle superposition in a delayed-choice experiment
Wang, K., Xu, Q., Zhu, S., & Ma, X.-S. (2019) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0509-0 · Cited by 44
Serafini, A. (2012) · ISRN Optics · doi:10.5402/2012/275016 · Cited by 43
Three-photon N00N states generated by photon subtraction from double photon pairs
Kim, H., Park, H. S., & Choi, S.-K. (2009) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.17.019720 · Cited by 44
Highly Efficient Processing of Multi-photon States
Lin, Q., & He, B. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep12792 · Cited by 42
Experimental characterization of the energetics of quantum logic gates
Cimini, V., Gherardini, S., Barbieri, M., Gianani, I., Sbroscia, M., Buffoni, L., Paternostro, M., & Caruso, F. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00325-7 · Cited by 42
Zou, X., Zhang, S. L., Li, K., & Guo, G. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.034302 · Cited by 42
Highly indistinguishable heralded single-photon sources using parametric down conversion
Tanida, M., Okamoto, R., & Takeuchi, S. (2012) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.20.015275 · Cited by 41
Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication Over a Noisy Classical Channel
Prevedel, R., Lu, Y., Matthews, W., Kaltenbaek, R., & Resch, K. J. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.110505 · Cited by 40
Self-citationLinear Optical Universal Quantum Gates with Higher Success Probabilities
Liu, W., & Wei, H. (2023) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202300009 · Cited by 41
A high-speed tunable beam splitter for feed-forward photonic quantum information processing
Ma, X.-S., Zotter, S., Tetik, N., Qarry, A., Jennewein, T., & Zeilinger, A. (2011) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.19.022723 · Cited by 40
Experimental Demonstration of Decoherence-Free One-Way Information Transfer
Prevedel, R., Tame, M., Stefanov, A., Paternostro, M., Kim, M. S., & Zeilinger, A. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.250503 · Cited by 38
Self-citationTwo-qubit decoherence mechanisms revealed via quantum process tomography
Kofman, A. G., & Korotkov, A. N. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.042103 · Cited by 39
Multiqubit entanglement engineering via projective measurements
Wieczorek, W., Kiesel, N., Schmid, C., & Weinfurter, H. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.022311 · Cited by 36
On photonic controlled phase gates
Kieling, K., O’Brien, J. L., & Eisert, J. (2010) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/1/013003 · Cited by 35
Self-citationEstimation of a quantum interaction parameter using weak measurements: Theory and experiment
Hofmann, H. F., Goggin, M. E., de Almeida, M. P., & Barbieri, M. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.040102 · Cited by 36
Geometrical Bounds on Irreversibility in Open Quantum Systems
Mancino, L., Cavina, V., Pasquale, A. D., Sbroscia, M., Booth, R. I., Roccia, E., Gianani, I., Giovannetti, V., & Barbieri, M. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.160602 · Cited by 35
All-optical quantum computing using cubic phase gates
Budinger, N., Furusawa, A., & van Loock, P. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.023332 · Cited by 38
Is wave–particle objectivity compatible with determinism and locality?
Ionicioiu, R., Jennewein, T. D., Mann, R. B., & Terno, D. R. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5997 · Cited by 34
Horodecki, R. (2021) · Acta Physica Polonica A · doi:10.12693/aphyspola.139.197 · Cited by 37
Amiri, R., Stárek, R., Reichmuth, D., Puthoor, I. V., Mičuda, M., Ladislav Mišta, Jr., Dušek, M., Wallden, P., & Andersson, E. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010335 · Cited by 32
Digital Discovery of 100 diverse Quantum Experiments with PyTheus
Ruiz-Gonzalez, C., Arlt, S., Petermann, J., Sayyad, S., Jaouni, T., Karimi, E., Tischler, N., Gu, X., & Krenn, M. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-12-12-1204 · Cited by 39
A bootstrapped, low-noise, and high-gain photodetector for shot noise measurement
Zhou, H. J., Yang, W., Li, Z., Li, X., & Zheng, Y. (2014) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.4862295 · Cited by 32
Unifying framework for spatial and temporal quantum correlations
Costa, F., Ringbauer, M., Goggin, M. E., White, A. G., & Fedrizzi, A. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.012328 · Cited by 41
Self-citationQuantum Locality in Game Strategy
Melo-Luna, C. A., Susa, C. E., Ducuara, A. F., Barreiro, A., & Reina, J. H. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44730 · Cited by 32
Topologically Protected Quantum Logic Gates with Valley‐Hall Photonic Crystals
He, L., Liu, D., Zhang, H., Zhang, F., Zhang, W., Feng, X., Huang, Y., Cui, K., Liu, F., Zhang, W., et al. (2024) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202311611 · Cited by 31
Engineering integrated photonics for heralded quantum gates
Meany, T., Biggerstaff, D. N., Broome, M. A., Fedrizzi, A., Delanty, M., Steel, M. J., Gilchrist, A., Marshall, G. D., White, A. G., & Withford, M. J. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep25126 · Cited by 31
Self-citationExperimental Quantum Process Discrimination
Laing, A., Rudolph, T., & O’Brien, J. L. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.160502 · Cited by 31
Self-citationUniversal Quantum Multi‐Qubit Entangling Gates with Auxiliary Spaces
Liu, W., Wei, H., & Kwek, L. C. (2022) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202100136 · Cited by 32
Universal discriminator for completely unknown optical qubits
He, B., Bergou, J. A., & Ren, Y. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.032301 · Cited by 30
Multi-time quantum correlations with no spatial analog
Ringbauer, M., Costa, F., Goggin, M. E., White, A. G., & Fedrizzi, A. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0086-y · Cited by 29
Self-citationDimensional Quantum Memory Advantage in the Simulation of Stochastic Processes
Ghafari, F., Tischler, N., Thompson, J., Gu, M., Shalm, L. K., Verma, V. B., Nam, S. W., Patel, R. B., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2019) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.041013 · Cited by 29
Self-citationFranco, C. D., Paternostro, M., Tsomokos, D. I., & Huelga, S. F. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.062337 · Cited by 28
What Is a Quantum-Mechanical “Weak Value” the Value of?
Svensson, B. E. Y. (2013) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-013-9740-6 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Langford, N. K., Weinhold, T. J., Prevedel, R., Resch, K. J., Gilchrist, A., O’Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., & White, A. G.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- University of Vienna (AT)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-11-18
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 210504-210504
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W1998141297
- Semantic Scholar
- d9688239d7e905dd0699832575c8889049b0add1
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 13.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Austrian Science Fund
- Queensland Government
- Agricultural Research Development Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- controlled-Z gate, quantum process tomography, continuous-wave operation, pulsed operation, guided optics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
