Cited by 262Laser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsAtomic and Molecular PhysicsLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics

Photoelectric Effect at Ultrahigh Intensities

Open access
Sorokin, A. A., Bobashev, S. V., Feigl, T., Tiedtke, K., Wabnitz, H., Richter, M.·2007·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

In the spectral range of the extreme ultraviolet at a wavelength of 13.3 nm, we have studied the photoionization of xenon at ultrahigh intensities. For our ion mass-to-charge spectroscopy experiments, irradiance levels from 10(12) to 10(16) W cm(-2) were achieved at the new free-electron laser in Hamburg FLASH by strong beam focusing with the aid of a spherical multilayer mirror. Ion charges up to Xe21+ were observed and investigated as a function of irradiance. Our surprising results are discussed in terms of a perturbative and nonperturbative description.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.99.213002

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High charge states produced by intense ultrashort FEL pulses can only be explained by absorption of many photons from the same pulse.

    “the high number of photons comprising the ultrashort femtosecond pulses gives rise to the production of high charge states, which can only be explained by the absorption of many photons from the same pulse (e.g [1,74]).”

    From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [74]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 322, 132 (1905).
  2. M. Protopapas, C. H. Keitel, and P. L. Knight, Rep. Prog. Phys. 60, 389 (1997).
  3. V. Ayvazyan et al., Eur. Phys. J. D 37, 297 (2006).
  4. W. Ackermann et al., Nat. Photon. 1, 336 (2007).
  5. P. G. O'Shea and H. P. Freund, Science 292, 1853 (2001).
  6. H. C. Kapteyn and T. Ditmire, Nature (London) 420, 467 (2002).
  7. J. Feldhaus, J. Arthur, and J. B. Hastings, J. Phys. B 38, S799 (2005).
  8. T. Sekikawa, A. Kosuge, T. Kanai, and S. Watanabe, Nature (London) 432, 605 (2004).
  9. T. Feigl, S. Yulin, N. Benoit, and N. Kaiser, Microelectron. Eng. 83, 703 (2006).
  10. A. A. Sorokin et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 221114 (2006).
  11. M. Richter et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 2970 (2003).
  12. A. A. Sorokin, S. V. Bobashev, K. Tiedtke, and M. Richter, J. Phys. B 39, L299 (2006).
  13. V. Schmidt, Rep. Prog. Phys. 55, 1483 (1992).
  14. T. Luhmann et al., Phys. Rev. A 57, 282 (1998).
  15. M. Sano et al., J. Phys. B 29, 5305 (1996).
  16. P. Andersen et al., J. Phys. B 34, 2009 (2001).
  17. Y. Itoh et al., J. Phys. B 34, 3493 (2001).
  18. E. D. Emmons et al., Phys. Rev. A 71, 042704 (2005).
  19. J. M. Bizau et al., Phys. Rev. A 73, 022718 (2006).
  20. A. Aguilar et al., Phys. Rev. A 73, 032717 (2006).
  21. P. Lablanquie et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 053001 (2001).
  22. K. Yamakawa et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 123001 (2004).
  23. Y. Nabekawa, H. Hasegawa, E. J. Takahashi, and K. Midorikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 043001 (2005).
  24. H. Wabnitz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 023001 (2005).
  25. R. Moshammer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 203001 (2007).
  26. P. Lambropoulos, L. A. A. Nikolopoulos, and M. G. Makris, Phys. Rev. A 72, 013410 (2005).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sorokin, A. A., Bobashev, S. V., Feigl, T., Tiedtke, K., Wabnitz, H., & Richter, M.
Affiliations
  • Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE)
  • Ioffe Institute (RU)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Optics and Precision Engineering (DE)
  • Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY (DE)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2007-11-20
Volume
99
Issue
21
Pages
213002-213002
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2070967387
Cited by
262
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
14.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Desy publication database (The Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Keywords
photoelectric effect, photoionization, xenon, extreme ultraviolet radiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review