The DOI matches its Crossref record; 249 of the 249 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Colloquium : Area laws for the entanglement entropy
Open accessAbstract
Physical interactions in quantum many-body systems are typically local: Individual constituents interact mainly with their few nearest neighbors. This locality of interactions is inherited by a decay of correlation functions, but also reflected by scaling laws of a quite profound quantity: the entanglement entropy of ground states. This entropy of the reduced state of a subregion often merely grows like the boundary area of the subregion, and not like its volume, in sharp contrast with an expected extensive behavior. Such ``area laws'' for the entanglement entropy and related quantities have received considerable attention in recent years. They emerge in several seemingly unrelated fields, in the context of black hole physics, quantum information science, and quantum many-body physics where they have important implications on the numerical simulation of lattice models. In this Colloquium the current status of area laws in these fields is reviewed. Center stage is taken by rigorous results on lattice models in one and higher spatial dimensions. The differences and similarities between bosonic and fermionic models are stressed, area laws are related to the velocity of information propagation in quantum lattice models, and disordered systems, nonequilibrium situations, and topological entanglement entropies are discussed. These questions are considered in classical and quantum systems, in their ground and thermal states, for a variety of correlation measures. A significant proportion is devoted to the clear and quantitative connection between the entanglement content of states and the possibility of their efficient numerical simulation. Matrix-product states, higher-dimensional analogs, and variational sets from entanglement renormalization are also discussed and the paper is concluded by highlighting the implications of area laws on quantifying the effective degrees of freedom that need to be considered in simulations of quantum states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, this fact is related to correlation and entanglement spreading according to the Lieb-Robinson theorem that states that, after a sufficiently large time, states can become strongly entangled ([91-96], see also [97]).”
From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [95]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810817 · Cited by 25,904
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
Anti de Sitter space and holography
Witten, E. (1998) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a2 · Cited by 13,070
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 · Cited by 10,118
Many-body physics with ultracold gases
Bloch, I., Dalibard, J., & Zwerger, W. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.885 · Cited by 8,114
Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups
White, S. R. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2863 · Cited by 7,702
Bekenstein, J. D. (1973) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.2333 · Cited by 7,555
Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons
Kitaev, A. Y. (2003) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/s0003-4916(02)00018-0 · Cited by 7,238
Large N field theories, string theory and gravity
Ofer Aharony, A., Gubser, S. S., MALDACENA, J. M., Ooguri, H., & Oz, Y. (2000) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(99)00083-6 · Cited by 6,327
HAWKING, S. W. (1974) · Nature · doi:10.1038/248030a0 · Cited by 5,669
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Anders, J., 2008, Quantum Inf. Comput., 8, 0245
- Its, A. R., 2007, Fields Inst. Commun., 50, 151
- Latorre, J. I., 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput., 4, 48
- 1999, Density-Matrix Renormalization, A New Numerical Method in Physics
- Plenio, M. B., 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput., 7, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory
Calabrese, P., & Cardy, J. (2009) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/50/504005 · Cited by 1,688
“I (n) A:B does not have all the correct properties to be an entanglement measure (see the review by Amico and Fazio in this special issue [8] for a discussion of various entanglement measures), but it has the fundamental property of satisfying the area law [6, 9], even at finite temperature [10].”
BackgroundThe classical-quantum boundary for correlations: Discord and related measures
Modi, K., Brodutch, A., Cable, H., Paterek, T., & Vedral, V. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1655 · Cited by 1,600
Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing
Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J. P., Degroote, M., Johnson, P. D., Kieferová, M., Kivlichan, I. D., Menke, T., Peropadre, B., Sawaya, N. P. D., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00803 · Cited by 1,560
Albash, T., & Lidar, D. A. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015002 · Cited by 1,546
Light-cone-like spreading of correlations in a quantum many-body system
Cheneau, M., Barmettler, P., Poletti, D., Endres, M., Schauß, P., Fukuhara, T., Gross, C., Bloch, I., Kollath, C., & Kuhr, S. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10748 · Cited by 864
Entanglement renormalization and holography
Swingle, B. (2012) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.065007 · Cited by 915
Vibrations, quanta and biology
Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2013) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00405000.2013.829687 · Cited by 568
Self-citationEfficient Simulation of Strong System-Environment Interactions
Prior, J., Chin, A. W., Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.050404 · Cited by 480
Self-citationMeasuring Entanglement Growth in Quench Dynamics of Bosons in an Optical Lattice
Daley, A. J., Pichler, H., Schachenmayer, J., & Zoller, P. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.020505 · Cited by 393
Extending Noether’s theorem by quantifying the asymmetry of quantum states
Marvian, I., & Spekkens, R. W. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4821 · Cited by 327
Tensor product methods and entanglement optimization for ab initio quantum chemistry
Szalay, S., Pfeffer, M., Murg, V., Barcza, G., Verstraete, F., Schneider, R., & Legeza, Ö. (2015) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24898 · Cited by 314
Can one trust quantum simulators?
Hauke, P., Cucchietti, F. M., Tagliacozzo, L., Deutsch, I., & Lewenstein, M. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/8/082401 · Cited by 315
Stripes in the two-dimensionalt-Jmodel with infinite projected entangled-pair states
Corboz, P., White, S. R., Vidal, G., & Troyer, M. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.041108 · Cited by 212
Quantum Entanglement in Deep Learning Architectures
Levine, Y., Sharir, O., Cohen, N., & Shashua, A. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.065301 · Cited by 206
Harnessing the Power of the Second Quantum Revolution
Deutsch, I. H. (2020) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.1.020101 · Cited by 207
Variational quantum eigensolver with fewer qubits
Liu, J.-G., Zhang, Y.-H., Wan, Y., & Wang, L. (2019) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.023025 · Cited by 166
Spectral Entropies as Information-Theoretic Tools for Complex Network Comparison
De Domenico, M., & Biamonte, J. (2016) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.041062 · Cited by 160
Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation
King, A. D., Nocera, A., Rams, M. M., Dziarmaga, J., Wiersema, R., Bernoudy, W., Raymond, J., Kaushal, N., Heinsdorf, N., Harris, R., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ado6285 · Cited by 138
Johnson, T. H., Clark, S. R., & Jaksch, D. (2014) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt10 · Cited by 127
Persistence of Locality in Systems with Power-Law Interactions
Gong, Z.-X., Foss-Feig, M., Michalakis, S., & Gorshkov, A. V. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.030602 · Cited by 122
Information Perspective to Probabilistic Modeling: Boltzmann Machines versus Born Machines
Cheng, S., Chen, J., & Wang, L. (2018) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e20080583 · Cited by 104
Variational benchmarks for quantum many-body problems
Wu, D., Rossi, R., Vicentini, F., Astrakhantsev, N., Becca, F., Cao, X., Carrasquilla, J., Ferrari, F., Georges, A., Hibat-Allah, M., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg9774 · Cited by 79
Scaling of variational quantum circuit depth for condensed matter systems
Bravo-Prieto, C., Lumbreras-Zarapico, J., Tagliacozzo, L., & Latorre, J. I. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-05-28-272 · Cited by 66
Ayral, T., Louvet, T., Zhou, Y., Lambert, C., Stoudenmire, E. M., & Waintal, X. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.020304 · Cited by 66
Parallel time-dependent variational principle algorithm for matrix product states
Secular, P., Gourianov, N., Lubasch, M., Dolgov, S., Clark, S. R., & Jaksch, D. (2020) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.235123 · Cited by 40
Density Matrix Renormalization Group with Tensor Processing Units
Ganahl, M., Beall, J., Hauru, M., Lewis, A. G. M., Wojno, T., Yoo, J. H., Zou, Y., & Vidal, G. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.010317 · Cited by 37
Entanglement-Induced Barren Plateaus
Ortiz Marrero, C., Kieferová, M., & Wiebe, N. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040316 · Cited by 39
Hybrid grid/basis set discretizations of the Schrödinger equation
White, S. R. (2017) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5007066 · Cited by 30
Spiers Memorial Lecture: Quantum chemistry, classical heuristics, and quantum advantage
Chan, G. K.-L. (2024) · Faraday Discussions · doi:10.1039/d4fd00141a · Cited by 20
Bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum algorithm for higher-order binary optimization
Romero, S. V., Visuri, A.-M., Cadavid, A. G., Simen, A., Solano, E., & Hegade, N. N. (2025) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02270-3 · Cited by 18
“While entanglement generally scales with the subsystem volume, in special cases, stricter bounds such as area laws can be derived [89, 90].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Eisert, J., Cramer, M., & Plenio, M. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Potsdam (DE)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2010-02-04
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 277-306
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W1922629554
- Cited by
- 2,873
- References
- 249
- Citations by year
- 2026: 164 · 2025: 232 · 2024: 229 · 2023: 204 · 2022: 225 · 2021: 196 · 2020: 206 · 2019: 205 · 2018: 169 · 2017: 163 · 2016: 166 · 2015: 158 · 2014: 163 · 2013: 141 · 2012: 99
- FWCI
- 64.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- area law, entanglement entropy, quantum many-body systems, lattice model, ground state, thermal states, disordered systems, non-equilibrium states, topological entanglement entropy, matrix product states, entanglement renormalization, correlation functions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review