The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resource fit in digital transformation: Lessons learned from the CBC Bank global e‐banking project
Abstract
Purpose: The implementation of e‐banking projects highlights the importance of digital transformation for contemporary organizations in order to survive and achieve competitive advantage in a digital economy. This paper aims to explore the development process of digital transformation through an e‐banking project based on the resource fit concept. Design/methodology/approach: The qualitative method of case study is applied. In total, 17 in‐depth interviews and secondary data were collected and analyzed. Findings: Numerous researches related to e‐banking have focused on either the resource‐based theory or strategic fit perspective, but not on both. This paper makes a unique contribution by constructing a resource fit framework that integrates these two theories. This framework offers a theoretical advancement in the resource fit literature. It includes four dimensions: external resource fit, internal resource fit, external capability fit, and internal capability fit. Through an actual empirical case examination of the resource fit framework, this study explored eight critical factors necessary for successful e‐banking project implementation. Research limitations/implications: This study fills a theoretical gap by developing an integrative framework and evaluating it via an empirical case study. Hence, examining this framework for organizational digital transformation in different industries and multiple case studies with cross‐cases comparison will be valuable for future research. Practical implications: The study demonstrated that managing digital transformation can be challenging, but awareness of, and preparedness for, analysis of both the resources/capability and external demands through the resource fit perspective are necessary. Originality/value: This paper offers a pioneer framework in the resource fit field and makes a practical case examination that can be useful for researchers and practitioners by taking a more detailed view of digital transformation development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042
The dynamic resource‐based view: capability lifecycles
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.332 · Cited by 4,553
Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777
Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148626 · Cited by 2,822
A proposed model of e-trust for electronic banking
Yousafzai, S. Y., Pallister, J. G., & Foxall, G. R. (2003) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(03)00130-5 · Cited by 583 · cited 1×
“Trust within organizations refers to an organization’s confidence or belief in the integrity and reliability of another organization (Yousafzai et al., 2003).”
Background
Cited by
Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022 · Cited by 5,720
Digital transformation maturity: A systematic review of literature
Teichert, R. (2019) · Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis · doi:10.11118/actaun201967061673 · Cited by 380
Dynamic capabilities for digital transformation
Ellström, D., Holtström, J., Berg, E., & Josefsson, C. (2022) · Journal of Strategy and Management · doi:10.1108/jsma-04-2021-0089 · Cited by 380
Caputo, F., Cillo, V., Candelo, E., & Liu, Y. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-07-2018-0833 · Cited by 199
Mhlanga, D., Denhere, V., & Moloi, T. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12070464 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, D., Chen, S., & Chou, T.
- Venue
- Management Decision
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2011-11-15
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1728-1742
- ISSN
- 0025-1747 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1486246218
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resource fit in digital transformation: Lessons learned from the CBC Bank global e‐banking project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/00251741111183852
- The paper
- Liu, D., Chen, S., & Chou, T. (2011). Resource fit in digital transformation: Lessons learned from the CBC Bank global e‐banking project. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111183852
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.