Cited by 85Information Technology Governance and StrategyCorporate Governance and ManagementOutsourcing and Supply Chain Management

Embracing sustainability: Information technology and the strategic leveraging of operations in third‐party logistics

Jeffers, Patrick I.·2010·International Journal of Operations & Production Management

Abstract

Purpose Resource‐based view proposes that possessing valuable, rare information technology (IT) resources that competitors cannot easily reproduce or replicate provides a competitive advantage, but mere ownership of such resources is no guarantee of competitiveness. There is a need also for a strategy paradigm that embraces the wider concerns of social and environmental sustainability as pressing issues of the twenty‐first century. “Operations‐as‐marketing” is a proven value‐chain based paradigm that calls for transforming operations from merely focusing on internal efficiency into a potent strategic marketing weapon, precisely targeted toward fulfilling customers' needs. Many leading companies have discovered latent economic benefits from adopting the tenets of corporate sustainability. By first establishing that corporate sustainability translates commercially into customer‐centric, lean productivity, the paper examines the potential mediating role of an “operations‐as‐marketing” strategy in framing IT investment decisions. Design/methodology/approach The research uses path analysis, involving a sample of third‐party logistics (3PL) firms. Findings Evidence supports the leading contention, thus outlining a customer‐centrism approach to enhancing the financial performance of 3PL firms. Research limitations/implications The research demonstrates a proven decision‐making framework for guiding IT investments that can allow proactive nurturing of a competitive advantage. The mai…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/01443571011024629

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Organisational adoption of technology is, in itself, insufficient to generate performance benefits.

    “The explanation for the IT paradox lies in the fact that organisational adoption of technology is, in itself, insufficient to generate performance benefits (Jeffers, 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 108 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeffers, P. I.
Affiliations
University of the West Indies (TT)
Corresponding author
Jeffers, Patrick I.
Venue
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2010-02-23
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
260-287
ISSN
0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044745785
Cited by
85
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Operations & Production Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Keywords
IT investment decisions, corporate sustainability, third-party logistics, customer-centricity, market orientation, resource-based view, competitive advantage, financial performance, mediating role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review