Cited by 78Outsourcing and Supply Chain ManagementCollaboration in agile enterprisesProduct Development and Customization

Managing global network operations along the engineering value chain

Zhang, Yufeng, Gregory, Mike·2011·International Journal of Operations & Production Management

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to improve understanding of how to manage global network operations from an engineering perspective. Design/methodology/approach: This research adopted a theory building approach based on case studies. Grounded in the existing literature, the theoretical framework was refined and enriched through nine in‐depth case studies in the industry sectors of aerospace, automotives, defence and electrics and electronics. Findings: This paper demonstrates the main value creation mechanisms of global network operations along the engineering value chain. Typical organisational features to support the value creation mechanisms are captured, and the key issues in engineering network design and operations are presented with an overall framework. Practical implications: Evidenced by a series of pilot applications, outputs of this research can help companies to improve the performance of their current engineering networks and design new engineering networks to better support their global businesses and customers in a systematic way. Originality/value: Issues about the design and operations of global engineering networks (GEN) are poorly understood in the existing literature in contrast to their apparent importance in value creation and realisation. To address this knowledge gap, this paper introduces the concept of engineering value chain to highlight the potential of a value chain approach to the exploration of engineering activities in a complex business context. At the same time, it develops an overall framework for managing GEN along the engineering value chain. This improves our understanding of engineering in industrial value chains and extends the theoretical understanding of GEN through integrating the engineering network theories and the value chain concepts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/01443571111144832

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The efficacy of these mechanisms depends on which part of the engineering value chain is the core focus of the operations: product development/production, design/idea generation, or service/support.

    “The efficacy of these mechanisms depends on which part of the engineering value chain is the core focus of the operations: product development/production, design/idea generation, or service/support.”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Zhang and Gregory, 2011

  • Zhang and Gregory (2011) identify mechanisms of value creation in global engineering networks: efficiency, innovation, and flexibility.

    “In a multiple case study of engineering firms, Zhang and Gregory (2011) identify mechanisms of value creation in global engineering networks: efficiency, innovation, and flexibility.”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Zhang and Gregory, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., & Gregory, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2011-06-21
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
736-764
ISSN
0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108655301
Cited by
78
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
18.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Operations & Production Management (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/E001769/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Collaboration in agile enterprises
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Product Development and Customization
Keywords
value creation, network design, network operation, value chain management, aerospace industry, automotive industry, defense industry, electronics industry, industrial value chain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review