The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamics of value propositions: insights from service‐dominant logic
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This paper aims to examine the notion of value propositions (promises of reciprocal value between service providers and their customers), value‐in‐exchange and value‐in‐use, all within the conceptual context of service‐dominant (S‐D) logic. Design/methodology/approach: Responding to calls in the recent literature for an academic critique of S‐D logic, its key constructs, and its application in marketing situations of varying complexity, the paper presents a conceptual analysis of the determinants of value emphasis in value propositions from the S‐D perspective. Findings: Four guiding principles are derived from a rigorous analysis of the relevant literatures. Ways are discussed in which firms might achieve greater flexibility in designing their market offerings, and thus manage different customer segments using different value propositions. The general conclusion is that the ability to communicate a firm's value propositions strategically and effectively is a new area for the development of competence at the core of competitive advantage. Research limitations/implications: The findings pave the way for empirical research into the dynamics of value propositions. Since the main focus of the conceptual framework is on the customer‐provider dyad, future studies should broaden coverage to multilateral settings and networked environments. Practical implications: Factors that determine the relative emphasis in value propositions between value‐in‐exchange and value‐in‐use are discussed, and the management implications derived from each of the four principles identified. Originality/value: The paper elaborates the application of S‐D logic in marketing by investigating the determinants of relative emphasis of value propositions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · Cited by 7,824
Managing the co-creation of value
Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0 · Cited by 3,502
Marketing Systems—A Core Macromarketing Concept
Layton, R. A. (2007) · Journal of Macromarketing · doi:10.1177/0276146707302836 · Cited by 411
Cited by
Servitization and deservitization: Overview, concepts, and definitions
Kowalkowski, C., Gebauer, H., Kamp, B., & Parry, G. (2017) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.12.007 · Cited by 558
Self-citationChandler, J. D., & Lusch, R. F. (2015) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670514537709 · Cited by 549
The customer value proposition: evolution, development, and application in marketing
Payne, A., Frow, P., & Eggert, A. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0523-z · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Kowalkowski, C.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2011-02-15
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1/2
- Pages
- 277-294
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086144435
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 55.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of value propositions: insights from service‐dominant logic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090561111095702
- The paper
- Kowalkowski, C. (2011). Dynamics of value propositions: insights from service‐dominant logic. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111095702
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.