CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,611Environmental Sustainability in BusinessPro-Environmental Behavior and AttitudesConsumer Behavior and Market Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium

Straughan, Robert D., Roberts, James A.·1999·Journal of Consumer Marketing
DOI 10.1108/07363769910297506
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Looking to the future of green marketing, examines the dynamic nature of ecologically conscious consumer behavior. The study also provides a method of profiling and segmenting college students based upon ecologically conscious consumer behavior. Findings indicate that, despite a significant amount of past research attention, demographic criteria are not as useful a profiling method as psychographic criteria. Consistent with past findings, the study indicates that perceived consumer effectiveness (PCE) provides the greatest insight into ecologically conscious consumer behavior. Further, the inclusion of altruism to the profile appears to add significantly to past efforts. Additional constructs examined suggest that environmental segmentation alternatives are more stable than past profiles that have relied primarily on demographic criteria.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/07363769910297506

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Anderson, W.T. Jr, Henion, K.E. and Cox, E.P. III (1974), “Socially vs ecologically responsible consumers”, AMA Combined Conference Proceedings, Vol. 36, Spring and Fall, pp. 304‐11.
  2. Hume, S., Strand, P., Fisher, C., Fitzgerald, K. and Freeman, L. (1989), “Consumers go green”, Advertising Age, September 25, pp. 3‐5.
  3. Schwartz, J. and Miller, T. (1991), “The earth’s best friends”, American Demographics, Vol. 13, February, pp. 26‐35.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A.
Affiliations
Baylor University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consumer Marketing
Publisher
Emerald
Published
1999-12-01
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
558-575
ISSN
0736-3761 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/07363769910297506
OpenAlex
W1997231614
Cited by
1,611
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 118 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 126 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 106 · 2015: 111 · 2014: 100 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 84
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Consumer Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer Behavior and Market Dynamics
Keywords
green consumer behavior, green marketing, consumer profiling, psychographic segmentation, demographic segmentation, perceived consumer effectiveness, altruism, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review