The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Service as business logic: implications for value creation and marketing
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to analyze the scope, content and nature of value co‐creation in a service logic‐based view of value creation, addressing the customer's perspective in a supplier‐customer relationship. The nature of the activities and the roles of the supplier and the customer in value creation and co‐creation are analyzed. Furthermore, the purpose is to discuss what implications for marketing can be derived from this analysis. Design/methodology/approach: The article analyzes the marketing implications that follow from the pivotal role of interactions in service provision. The article, thus, builds on a long history in service marketing research pointing at the impact on the content and scope of marketing of customer‐supplier interactions. Findings: In this article, it is concluded that creating customer value is a multilaned process consisting of two conceptually distinct subprocesses. These are the supplier's process of providing resources for customer's use and the customer's process of turning service into value. The article results in five service logic theses which provide an understanding of the process of value creation and its implications for marketing. The theses offer a terminology that helps researchers and practitioners to understand the various roles of suppliers and customers in value creation and to analyze opportunities for co‐creation of value. Originality/value: The findings of this article challenge some of the salient propositions of the emerging service‐dominant logic, i.e. customers as co‐creators of value, and firms can only make value propositions. The role of marketing is reframed beyond its conventional borders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · Cited by 7,824
Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees
Bitner, M. J. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252042 · Cited by 7,271
Managing the co-creation of value
Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0 · Cited by 3,502
Co‐creating unique value with customers
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004) · Strategy & Leadership · doi:10.1108/10878570410699249 · Cited by 2,463
The value concept and relationship marketing
Ravald, A., & Grönroos, C. (1996) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090569610106626 · Cited by 2,180
Self-citationA Role Theory Perspective on Dyadic Interactions: The Service Encounter
Solomon, M. R., Surprenant, C., Czepiel, J. A., & Gutman, E. G. (1985) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251180 · Cited by 2,004
Service portraits in service research: a critical review
Edvardsson, B., Gustafsson, A., & Roos, I. (2005) · International Journal of Service Industry Management · doi:10.1108/09564230510587177 · Cited by 763
Cited by
The Role of Customer Engagement Behavior in Value Co-Creation: A Service System Perspective
Jaakkola, E., & Alexander, M. (2014) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670514529187 · Cited by 1,219
Managing Co-creation Design: A Strategic Approach to Innovation
Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., & Storbacka, K. (2015) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12087 · Cited by 518
The customer value proposition: evolution, development, and application in marketing
Payne, A., Frow, P., & Eggert, A. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0523-z · Cited by 440
Customer dominant value formation in service
Heinonen, K., Strandvik, T., & Voima, P. (2013) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/09555341311302639 · Cited by 353
Hardyman, W., Daunt, K. L., & Kitchener, M. (2015) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.881539 · Cited by 312
Customer participation and value creation: a systematic review and research implications
Mustak, M., Jaakkola, E., & Halinen, A. (2013) · Managing Service Quality: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/msq-03-2013-0046 · Cited by 302
Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled CRM capability in healthcare: The impact on service innovation
Kumar, P., Sharma, S. K., & Dutot, V. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102598 · Cited by 176
Wang, S., Berbekova, A., Uysal, M., & Wang, J. (2024) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/00472875221146786 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Grönroos, C., & Ravald, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Service Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2011-03-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-22
- ISSN
- 1757-5818 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095026705
- Cited by
- 895
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 169.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.