Cited by 312Service and Product InnovationMental Health and Patient InvolvementPublic Policy and Administration Research

Value Co-Creation through Patient Engagement in Health Care: A micro-level approach and research agenda

Hardyman, Wendy, Daunt, Kate L., Kitchener, Martin·2015·Public Management Review

Abstract

Patient engagement has gained increasing prominence within academic literatures and policy discourse. With limited developments in practice, most extant academic contributions are conceptual, with initiatives in the National Health Service (NHS) concentrating at macro- rather than at micro-level. This may be one reason why the issue of ‘value co-creation’ has received limited attention within academic discussions of patient engagement or policy pronouncements. Drawing on emerging ideas in the services marketing and public management literatures, this article offers the first elucidation of the importance of studying ‘value co-creation’ as a basis for further empirical analysis of patient engagement in micro-level encounters.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14719037.2014.881539

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bendapudi, N. and Leone, R. P. (2003) Psychological Implications of Customer Participation in CoProduction. Journal of Marketing , 67:1 pp14-28.
  2. Berry, L. L. and Bendapudi, N. (2007) Health Care: A Fertile Field for Service Research. Journal of Service Research, 10:2 pp111-122.
  3. Coulter, A. (2011) Engaging Patients in Healthcare, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  4. Grönroos, C (2007) Service Management and Marketing, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hardyman, W., Daunt, K. L., & Kitchener, M.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Hardyman, Wendy
  • Daunt, Kate L.
  • Kitchener, Martin
Venue
Public Management Review
Published
2014-02-07
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
90-107
ISSN
  • 1461-667X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-9037
  • 1471-9045
OpenAlex
W1978925618
Cited by
312
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
59.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
value co-creation, patient engagement, health care, service marketing, public sector management, National Health Service, patient-provider interaction, health policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review