CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 134RFID technology advancementsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourERP Systems Implementation and Impact

The adoption and continued usage intention of RFID: an integrated framework

Alamgir Hossain, Mohammad, Quaddus, Mohammed·2011·Information Technology & People
DOI 10.1108/09593841111158365
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the factors of radio frequency identification (RFID) adoption and its continuance intention in a mandatory and in a voluntary environment leading to developing an integrated framework. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative research approach was taken in this study. The authors conducted an extensive field study, interviewing eight organizations. Factors have been analyzed from multiple perspectives and, where possible, related with the existing literature. Findings: The findings show that along with technological, organizational, and environmental factors RFID adoption also depends on the expectations and self‐efficacy. Moreover, the process of continued usage intention involves satisfaction from current use and the degree of self‐efficacy. Practical implications: This study focuses on the state of the RFID adoption, current usage satisfaction, and the continuance intention of the adopters toward RFID use. This study would guide the countries with mandatory RFID policy in organizational applications. Policy makers could compare their experience with the findings of this study, evaluate the past, and find the future direction. Originality/value: This study is the first of its kind to discuss the adoption factors (in a mixed environment; mandatory as well as voluntary) and to examine the continued usage behavior together in a single platform, for the first time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09593841111158365

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • T-O-E framework provides a more superior theoretical analysis than IDT in studying technology adoption, use, and value creation.

    “by integrating the constructs of environment, T-O-E framework provides a more superior theoretical analysis than IDT in studying technology adoption, use, and value creation (Gangwar et al., 2014;Hossain & Quaddus, 2011;Oliveira & Martins, 2011).”

    From Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution (2016) · cites this paper as Hossain & Quaddus, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Alamgir Hossain, M., & Quaddus, M.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
ORCID
Quaddus, Mohammed
Venue
Information Technology & People
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2011-08-23
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
236-256
ISSN
0959-3845 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/09593841111158365
OpenAlex
W2036785724
Cited by
134
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
15.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
  • Information Technology and People (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › RFID technology advancements
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
Keywords
RFID adoption, continuance intention, self-efficacy, user satisfaction, technology adoption factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review