Cited by 47Technology Adoption and User BehaviourRFID technology advancementsAgricultural Innovations and Practices

The development and validation of a two-staged adoption model of RFID technology in livestock businesses

Hossain, Mohammad Alamgir, Standing, Craig, Chan, Caroline·2017·Information Technology & People

Abstract

Purpose Grounded on the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework, the purpose of this paper is to develop a two-stage model of radio frequency identification (RFID) adoption in livestock businesses. RFID adoption is divided into two stages, acceptance and extension. It is argued that RFID adoption in livestock businesses is influenced by technological (interoperability, technology readiness), organizational (readiness, market scope), and environmental (competitive market pressure, data inconsistency) factors. Design/methodology/approach From a qualitative field study, along with the support of existing literature, the authors developed a research model, which was then validated with survey data of 318 livestock businesses in Australia. Data analysis used partial least squares structural equation modeling. Findings Empirical results showed that interoperability, organizational readiness, and competitive market pressure, and data inconsistency significantly influence acceptance of RFID technology in livestock businesses. In addition, the extended use of RFID is determined mainly by interoperability, technology readiness, organizational market scope, and data inconsistency. The results suggested differential effect of data inconsistency– it had a negative influence on RFID acceptance but a positive impact on the extent of its use. Originality/value This is one of the first studies to examine RFID adoption as a two-stage process. The theoretical basis was based on TOE framework and the factors were developed from a field study. The results of this study will provide insights for different livestock industry including technologists, farm managers, and market players.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/itp-06-2016-0133

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hossain, M. A., Standing, C., & Chan, C.
Affiliations
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
Venue
Information Technology & People
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2017-11-06
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
785-808
ISSN
0959-3845 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2762174909
Cited by
47
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Technology and People (publishedVersion)
  • Edith Cowan University Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › RFID technology advancements
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Keywords
RFID adoption, livestock industry, technology-organization-environment framework, technology acceptance, technology extension, interoperability, technology readiness, organizational readiness, market scope, data inconsistency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review