The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using the kaleidoscope career model to examine generational differences in work attitudes
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine, utilising the Kaleidoscope Career Model, whether members of the Baby Boom generation and Generation X differ in their needs for authenticity, balance, and challenge. Design/methodology/approach: Survey data were obtained from 982 professionals located across the USA. Correlations, t‐tests, and multiple regressions were performed to test the hypotheses. Findings: Members of Generation X have higher needs for authenticity and balance than Baby Boomers. There was no difference in needs for challenge between Baby Boomers and members of Generation X. Research limitations/implications: A limitation in the study, as well as in most of the research on generational differences, is the use of cross‐sectional designs that fail to capture the influence of the aging process. A longitudinal, multi‐survey design over the lives of individuals would enable scholars to capture within‐ and between‐person differences and to permit a better understanding of whether differences are in fact due to generational effects or to aging. Practical implications: Knowledge of the differences and similarities among the various generations in the workforce can help organizational leaders make important decisions about human resource policies and practices. Originality/value: Many studies in the popular press stress the prevalence and importance of generational differences in the workplace. However, the little academic research that has been conducted has shown mixed results. The study uses the theoretical framework of the Kaleidoscope Career Model to examine generational differences in work attitudes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,361
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,249
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
The Practice of Social Research
Neustadtl, A., & Babbie, E. (1989) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/1318433 · Cited by 14,398
An Introduction to Qualitative Research
Flick, U. (2023) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036231712 · Cited by 8,198
The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home
Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (2012) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,230
Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93 · Cited by 2,932
Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life.
Arthur, M. B., & Kram, K. E. (1985) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392687 · Cited by 2,670
In a Different Voice: Women's Conceptions of Self and of Morality
Gilligan, C. (1977) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.47.4.g6167429416hg5l0 · Cited by 2,405
The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work
Hochschild, A. R. (2018) · Inequality in the 21st Century · doi:10.4324/9780429499821-63 · Cited by 2,083
Cited by
Integrating Psychological Contracts and Ecosystems in Career Studies and Management
Baruch, Y., & Rousseau, D. M. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0103 · Cited by 282
Hurst, J. L., & Good, L. K. (2009) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/13620430910997303 · Cited by 140
Generational differences in China: career implications
Yi, X., Ribbens, B., & Morgan, C. N. (2010) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/13620431011084439 · Cited by 105
Employability of older workers in the Netherlands: Antecedents and consequences
Hennekam, S. (2015) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-12-2013-0289 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Sullivan, S. E., Forret, M. L., Carraher, S. M., & Mainiero, L. A.
- Venue
- Career Development International
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-06-19
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 284-302
- ISSN
- 1362-0436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021366194
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 38.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using the kaleidoscope career model to examine generational differences in work attitudes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13620430910966442
- The paper
- Sullivan, S. E., Forret, M. L., Carraher, S. M., & Mainiero, L. A. (2009). Using the kaleidoscope career model to examine generational differences in work attitudes. Career Development International. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910966442
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.