Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Balancing innovation: the role of paradoxical leadership and ambidexterity in fostering team creativity

Khan, Muhammad Tasnim, Ullah, Sami·2026·International Journal of Innovation Science
DOI 10.1108/ijis-07-2024-0206
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: This study, grounded in ambidexterity theory, aims to investigate how paradoxical leadership (PXL) fosters team creativity in high-tech manufacturing companies, with team ambidexterity as a mediator and leader vision as a moderator. Given the fast-paced, innovation-driven demands of the high-tech sector, this research provides insights into how managers can effectively balance contradictory behaviors to drive team innovation. Design/methodology/approach: Data was collected through a two-wave survey from team leaders and members across 169 teams in high-tech manufacturing companies. The time interval between data collection waves was two weeks. The data was aggregated at the team level using estimates for interrater reliability and interrater agreement. The structural equation modeling in R was used to test hypotheses. Findings: The findings indicate that PXL positively impacts team creativity directly and through its influence on team ambidexterity. Team ambidexterity mediates the relationship between PXL and team creativity, while leader vision moderates the effects of PXL on team ambidexterity. Practical implications: PXL benefits high-performance teams in technology sectors, such as software development, where rapid innovation and iterative processes are essential. In health care, PXL can optimize team dynamics, enabling medical research and patient care delivery breakthroughs. Regular training in ambidextrous thinking and feedback mechanisms makes this approach actionable for managers striving to cultivate creativity in high-stakes environments. Originality/value: This study extends ambidexterity theory by linking PXL and team ambidexterity to team creativity. It provides high-tech manufacturing managers with concrete strategies to balance exploration and exploitation. These findings highlight actionable pathways for companies to sustain innovation in competitive, technology-driven industries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijis-07-2024-0206

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. Abi Saad, 2023, Creativity in virtual teams: systematic review, synthesis and research agenda, Creativity and Innovation Management, 32, 117, 10.1111/caim.12540 · DOI
  2. Abrantes, 2023, Looking at team improvised adaptation through a paradoxical lens: the role of team plasticity, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 59, 88, 10.1177/00218863211037441 · DOI
  3. Ahmad, 2023, Development under belt and road initiative: gains for tourism industry in participant countries, Journal of China Tourism Research, 19, 950, 10.1080/19388160.2023.2167895 · doi:10.1080/19388160.2023.2167895
  4. Alghamdi, 2018, Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7, 1, 10.1186/s13731-018-0081-8 · DOI
  5. Batool, 2023, Paradoxical leader behavior and leader effectiveness: moderating role of structural and job-related uncertainty, European Business Review, 35, 239, 10.1108/EBR-08-2022-0163 · DOI
  6. Boemelburg, 2023, How paradoxical leaders guide their followers to embrace paradox: cognitive and behavioral mechanisms of paradox mindset development, Long Range Planning, 56, 102319, 10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102319 · DOI
  7. Chen, 2021, Humble leader behavior and team creativity: the team learning perspective, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 36, 272, 10.1108/JMP-09-2019-0536 · DOI
  8. Dai, 2022, Differentiated transformational leadership, conflict and team creativity: an experimental study in China, International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17, 1679, 10.1108/IJOEM-12-2020-1478 · DOI
  9. Devi, 2024, Paradoxical leadership and employee creativity: knowledge sharing and hiding as mediators, Journal of Knowledge Management, 28, 312, 10.1108/JKM-10-2022-0779 · DOI
  10. Dutta, 2023, Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the Face of Uncertainty
  11. Fong, 2018, Knowledge hiding and team creativity: the contingent role of task interdependence, Management Decision, 56, 329, 10.1108/MD-11-2016-0778 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Franken, 2020, Paradoxical leadership in public sector organizations: its role in fostering employee resilience, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79, 93, 10.1111/1467-8500.12396 · DOI
  13. Griffin, 2010, Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: a longitudinal study, Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 174, 10.1037/a0017263 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Guo, 2020, The mobility of team members and team creativity: exploring the mediating role of team cognition, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33, 1111, 10.1108/JOCM-03-2020-0073 · DOI
  15. Guo, 2020, Ambidextrous leadership and employee work outcomes: a paradox theory perspective, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1661, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01661 · DOI
  16. Hair, 2019, When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM, European Business Review, 31, 2, 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Han, 2022, Creating team ambidexterity: the effects of leader dialectical thinking and collective team identification, European Management Journal, 40, 175, 10.1016/j.emj.2021.06.004 · DOI
  18. Hossain, 2024, The interplay among paradoxical leadership, industry 4.0 technologies, organisational ambidexterity, strategic flexibility and corporate sustainable performance in manufacturing SMEs of Malaysia, European Business Review, 36, 639, 10.1108/EBR-04-2023-0109 · DOI
  19. Hwang, 2023, Open innovation and organizational ambidexterity, European Journal of Innovation Management, 26, 862, 10.1108/EJIM-06-2021-0303 · DOI
  20. Iqbal, 2024, The impact of organizational culture on knowledge sharing and absorptive capacity: a study of the microfinance institutions in Pakistan, South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 1
  21. Ishaq, 2021, Paradoxical leader behaviors: leader personality and follower outcomes, Applied Psychology, 70, 342, 10.1111/apps.12233 · DOI
  22. Ivcevic, 2024, Self-regulation of creativity: toward measuring strategies of creative action, Creativity Research Journal, 36, 491, 10.1080/10400419.2023.2226494 · DOI
  23. James, 1993, Rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306, 10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Jansen, 2016, A socio-psychological perspective on team ambidexterity: the contingency role of supportive leadership behaviours, Journal of Management Studies, 53, 939, 10.1111/joms.12183 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Jia, 2014, A social–structural perspective on employee–organization relationships and team creativity, Academy of Management Journal, 57, 869, 10.5465/amj.2011.0147 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Julmi, 2021, Crazy, stupid, disobedience: the dark side of paradoxical leadership, Leadership, 17, 631, 10.1177/17427150211040693 · DOI
  27. Khalid, 2022, Environmental impact assessment of CPEC: a way forward for sustainable development, International Journal of Development Issues, 21, 159, 10.1108/IJDI-08-2021-0154 · doi:10.1108/ijdi-08-2021-0154
  28. Knight, 2020, Enabling organizational ambidexterity: valuation practices and the senior-leadership team, Human Relations, 73, 190, 10.1177/0018726718823247 · DOI
  29. Kundi, 2023, Linking paradoxical leadership and individual in-role and extra-role performance: a multilevel examination, Management Decision, 61, 2851, 10.1108/MD-10-2022-1353 · DOI
  30. LeBreton, 2023, Data aggregation in multilevel research: best practice recommendations and tools for moving forward, Journal of Business and Psychology, 38, 239, 10.1007/s10869-022-09853-9 · DOI
  31. Lewis, 2023, Today’s most critical leadership skill: navigating paradoxes, Leader to Leader, 2023, 12, 10.1002/ltl.20686 · doi:10.1002/ltl.20686
  32. Liu, 2023, Does paradoxical leadership better predict employee outcomes than servant leadership? The differential effects on subordinate creativity and psychological need satisfaction, Current Psychology, 42, 29242, 10.1007/s12144-022-03965-4 · DOI
  33. Lubatkin, 2006, Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration, Journal of Management, 32, 646, 10.1177/0149206306290712 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Malik, 2024, Navigating Post-Covid consumer behavior: the role of company CSR practices in shaping purchase intention across different demographic profiles, Remittances Review, 9
  35. Maqbool, 2024, Abusive supervisor triggers counterproductive work behaviors in nursing staff: role of psychological contract breach and islamic work ethics, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 45, 461, 10.1108/LODJ-06-2023-0295 · DOI
  36. Mom, 2009, Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms, Organization Science, 20, 812, 10.1287/orsc.1090.0427 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Papachroni, 2020, Ambidexterity as practice: individual ambidexterity through paradoxical practices, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56, 143, 10.1177/0021886320913048 · DOI
  38. Papachroni, 2015, Organizational ambidexterity through the lens of paradox theory: building a novel research agenda, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51, 71, 10.1177/0021886314553101 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Pearce, 2024, Moderated paradoxical leadership: resolving the innovation team leadership conundrum, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 41, 3, 10.1111/jpim.12713 · DOI
  40. Podsakoff, 2012, Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it, Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539, 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Rampa, 2021, Developing radical innovation capabilities: exploring the effects of training employees for creativity and innovation, Creativity and Innovation Management, 30, 211, 10.1111/caim.12423 · DOI
  42. Rao, 2024, Reacting to the ambidexterity mandate: how experienced tensions and cognitive dissonance influence innovative behaviors in a global organization, Strategic Organization, 22, 297, 10.1177/14761270231193386 · DOI
  43. Rosing, 2011, Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: ambidextrous leadership, The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 956, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Sarstedt, 2019, How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM, Australasian Marketing Journal, 27, 197, 10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Shao, 2019, Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: the double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 7, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.008 · DOI
  46. Shrestha, 2021, Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis, American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9, 4, 10.12691/ajams-9-1-2 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Silalahi, 2021, Ambidexterity, prosocial impact, and task performance in cross-functional teams: the role of individual’s team identification, Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 8, 282, 10.1108/JOEPP-12-2020-0237 · DOI
  48. Snehvrat, 2022, Ambidexterity and absorptive capacity in boundary-spanning managers: role of paradox mindset and learning goal orientation, Management Decision, 60, 3209, 10.1108/MD-03-2021-0328 · DOI
  49. Sparr, 2022, Paradoxical leadership as sensegiving: stimulating change-readiness and change-oriented performance, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 43, 225, 10.1108/LODJ-04-2021-0161 · DOI
  50. Trieu, 2024, Organizational resilience, ambidexterity and performance: the roles of information technology competencies, digital transformation policies and paradoxical leadership, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32, 1302, 10.1108/IJOA-05-2023-3750 · DOI
  51. Ullah, 2023, Innovation and economic performance of firms in national science and technology park, Islamabad, Pakistan, foresight, 25, 633, 10.1108/FS-08-2021-0151 · doi:10.1108/fs-08-2021-0151
  52. Ullah, 2024, Leveraging technological readiness and green dynamic capability to enhance sustainability performance in manufacturing firms, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 1
  53. Ullah, 2024, Improving green innovation performance: the role of integrating green customers and suppliers, government regulations, green knowledge integration capability, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1
  54. Volk, 2023, A circadian theory of paradoxical leadership, Academy of Management Review, 48, 611, 10.5465/amr.2020.0468 · DOI
  55. Waseel, 2024, Leadership, knowledge dynamics and dual-path innovation: unravelling the synergy in Pakistan’s manufacturing sector, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 39, 2104, 10.1108/JBIM-09-2023-0518 · DOI
  56. Wei, 2023, Learning to integrate conflicts: paradoxical leadership fosters team innovation, Journal of Business Research, 165, 114076, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114076 · DOI
  57. Zahoor, 2024, Ambidexterity in strategic alliances: an integrative review of the literature, International Journal of Management Reviews, 26, 82, 10.1111/ijmr.12348 · DOI
  58. Zhang, 2022, Balancing employees’ extrinsic requirements and intrinsic motivation: a paradoxical leader behaviour perspective, European Management Journal, 40, 127, 10.1016/j.emj.2021.11.008 · DOI
  59. Zhang, 2022, Paradoxical leadership and innovation in work teams: the multilevel mediating role of ambidexterity and leader vision as a boundary condition, Academy of Management Journal, 65, 1652, 10.5465/amj.2017.1265 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Zhang, 2015, Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: antecedents and consequences, Academy of Management Journal, 58, 538, 10.5465/amj.2012.0995 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Zhang, 2022, Paradoxical leadership, subjective ambivalence, and employee creativity: effects of employee holistic thinking, Journal of Management Studies, 59, 695, 10.1111/joms.12792 · DOI
  62. Zhou, 2018, Visionary leadership and employee creativity in China, International Journal of Manpower, 39, 93, 10.1108/IJM-04-2016-0092 · DOI
  63. Fornell, 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39, 10.1177/002224378101800104 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Lei, 2021, The impact of authentic leadership on individual and team creativity: a multilevel perspective, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 42, 644, 10.1108/LODJ-12-2019-0519 · DOI
  65. Zheng, 2024, Humble leadership and employee creative performance in China: the roles of boundary spanning behavior and traditionality, Personnel Review, 53, 193, 10.1108/PR-10-2021-0775 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Khan, M. T., & Ullah, S.
Venue
International Journal of Innovation Science
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2025-01-16
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
1162-1183
ISSN
  • 1757-2223
  • 1757-2231
DOI
10.1108/ijis-07-2024-0206
Cited by
17
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Balancing innovation: the role of paradoxical leadership and ambidexterity in fostering team creativity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ijis-07-2024-0206
The paper
Khan, M. T., & Ullah, S. (2026). Balancing innovation: the role of paradoxical leadership and ambidexterity in fostering team creativity. International Journal of Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijis-07-2024-0206

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.