Cited by 315Impact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Media and PhilosophyCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

Fear of missing out (FoMO) among social media users: a systematic literature review, synthesis and framework for future research

Open access
Tandon, Anushree, Dhir, Amandeep, Almugren, Intesar, AlNemer, Ghada Naif, Mäntymäki, Matti·2021·Internet Research

Abstract

Purpose Research examining the “fear of missing out” (FoMO) is increasingly prominent, with a growing number of studies exploring this phenomenon. Despite the increased academic interest, no attempts have been made to synthesize extant knowledge on FoMO. There is limited holistic understanding of its conceptualization and operationalization. To address this gap, an exhaustive systematic literature review (SLR) on FoMO is presented. Design/methodology/approach Systematic review protocols and content analysis was used to analyze and synthesize insights from 58 empirical studies obtained from four academic databases: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and PsycINFO. Findings Significant diversity in prior research on FoMO was encapsulated in four themes. There are significant limitations in conceptualization of FoMO, along with narrow focus on geographic, methodological and contextual foci of prior studies. The authors propose a comprehensive framework and extensive gap-specific research directions to aid future research. Research limitations/implications The SLR is limited in its consideration of empirical studies published in academic journal articles obtained from four databases. Social implications The authors imply the critical need to ascertain motives for individuals' excessive engagement with social media and the subsequent impact on well-being indicators (e.g. sleep quality) and functional impairments (e.g. addiction). Originality/value This study magnifies and expands the i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/intr-11-2019-0455

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Almugren, I., AlNemer, G. N., & Mäntymäki, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • University of Agder (NO)
  • Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA)
Venue
Internet Research
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2021-02-12
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
782-821
ISSN
1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3129941792
Cited by
315
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 17
FWCI
9.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Research (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
fear of missing out, social media use, social media engagement, operationalization, research gaps, sleep quality, social media addiction, well-being, cultural differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review