Cited by 408Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

Fear of missing out: prevalence, dynamics, and consequences of experiencing FOMO

Milyavskaya, Marina, Saffran, Mark, Hope, Nora, Koestner, Richard·2018·Motivation and Emotion

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11031-018-9683-5

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milyavskaya, M., Saffran, M., Hope, N., & Koestner, R.
Affiliations
  • Carleton University (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Milyavskaya, Marina
Venue
Motivation and Emotion
Published
2018-03-17
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
725-737
ISSN
  • 0146-7239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6644
OpenAlex
W2792847665
Cited by
408
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 15 · 2015: 1
FWCI
60.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Motivation and Emotion (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (410-2011-0465)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
fear of missing out, university students, negative affect, fatigue, stress, somatic symptoms, sleep, social media, self-regulation, ecological momentary assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review