Cited by 11Work-Family Balance ChallengesCyberloafing and Workplace BehaviorTechnostress in Professional Settings

Understanding employees' response to work-related after-hours use of instant messaging apps: a stress and coping perspective

Cheng, Hsiang-Lan, Lin, Tung-Ching, Tan, Wee-Kheng, Chiu, Chao-Min·2021·Online Information Review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the complex relationships between permeability, work-family conflict, moral disengagement, behavioral disengagement, job strain and job engagement. In addition, this study aims to determine whether moral disengagement acts as a moderator and mediator in the relationship between work-family conflict and behavioral disengagement. Design/methodology/approach: The authors apply partial least squares structural equation modeling to test the hypotheses, using a sample of 176 valid responses. Findings: The results indicate that permeability is likely to promote work-family conflict, which in turn may trigger moral disengagement. Moral disengagement may lead to behavioral disengagement, which in turn may increase job strain and decrease job engagement. The findings also show that work-family conflict does not have a significant effect on behavioral disengagement, suggesting that moral disengagement fully mediates the influence of work-family conflict on behavioral disengagement. In addition, the moderating effect of moral disengagement is not significant. Originality/value: Applying the transactional model of stress and coping theory and the moral disengagement theory, this study contributes to a better understanding of employees' experience of job strain caused by work-family conflict (induced by permeability of IM usage), as well as the employee's coping response.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/oir-06-2020-0214

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Task assignments of supervisors via an instant messenger after work hour increases work-family conflicts.

    “Task assignments of supervisors via an instant messenger after work hour increases work-family conflicts”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Cheng et al. (2021)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, H.-L., Lin, T.-C., Tan, W.-K., & Chiu, C.-M.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Health and Welfare (TW)
  • National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
Venue
Online Information Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2021-04-30
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
1247-1267
ISSN
1468-4527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3159931479
Cited by
11
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Online Information Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
Keywords
instant messaging apps, work-family conflict, moral disengagement, behavioral disengagement, job strain, work engagement, stress coping, transactional model of stress and coping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review