The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chapter 2 Resource dependence theory: Past and future
Abstract
This chapter reviews the origins and primary arguments of resource dependence theory and traces its influence on the subsequent literatures in multiple social science and professional disciplines, contrasting it with Emerson's power-dependence theory. Recent years have seen an upsurge in the theory's citations in the literature, which we attribute in part to Stanford's position of power in the network of academic exchange. We conclude with a review of some promising lines of recent research that extend and qualify resource dependence theory's insights, and outline potentially fruitful areas of future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · Cited by 71,491
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
External Control of Organizations: Resource Dependence Perspective
(2011) · Organizational Behavior 6 · doi:10.4324/9781315701967-54 · Cited by 14,181
Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.
O'Brien, D. P., & Williamson, O. E. (1976) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230812 · Cited by 13,381
The Population Ecology of Organizations
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226424 · Cited by 7,568
The Modern Corporation and Private Property
Kline, J. V., Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1933) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1115736 · Cited by 7,361
Emerson, R. M. (1962) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089716 · Cited by 6,265
Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems
Braito, R., & Scott, W. R. (1988) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/1318172 · Cited by 5,192
Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals
Robinson, W. S. (1950) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2087176 · Cited by 4,513
Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment
Pfeffer, J. (1972) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393956 · Cited by 1,990
Cited by
Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective
Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2326 · Cited by 365
Bibliometric analysis of absorptive capacity
Apriliyanti, I. D., & Alon, I. (2017) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.02.007 · Cited by 359
Chen, P., & Hao, Y. (2022) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2324 · Cited by 322
Frequently asked questions about the social licence to operate
Boutilier, R. G. (2014) · Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal · doi:10.1080/14615517.2014.941141 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, G. F., & Adam Cobb, J.
- Venue
- Research in the Sociology of Organizations
- Publisher
- Emerald Group Publishing Limited
- Published
- 2010-01
- Pages
- 21-42
- ISSN
- 0733-558X (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.1108/s0733-558x(2010)0000028006
- OpenAlex
- W2506027366
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 53.63
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chapter 2 Resource dependence theory: Past and future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/s0733-558x(2010)0000028006
- The paper
- Davis, G. F., & Adam Cobb, J. (2010). Chapter 2 Resource dependence theory: Past and future. Research in the Sociology of Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x(2010)0000028006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.