The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding blockchain technology for future supply chains: a systematic literature review and research agenda
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to investigate the way in which blockchain technology is likely to influence future supply chain practices and policies. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic review of both academic and practitioner literature was conducted. Multiple accounts of blockchain adoption within industry were also consulted to gain further insight. Findings: While blockchain technologies remain in their infancy, they are gaining momentum within supply chains, trust being the predominant factor driving their adoption. The value of such technologies for supply chain management lies in four areas: extended visibility and traceability, supply chain digitalisation and disintermediation, improved data security and smart contracts. Several challenges and gaps in understanding and opportunities for further research are identified by this research. How a blockchain-enabled supply chain should be configured has also been explored from a design perspective. Research limitations/implications: This systematic review focuses on the diffusion of blockchain technology within supply chains, and great care was taken in selecting search terms. However, the authors acknowledge that their choice of terms may have excluded certain blockchain articles from this review. Practical implications: This paper offers valuable insight for supply chain practitioners into how blockchain technology has the potential to disrupt existing supply chain provisions as well as a number of challenges to its successful diffusion. Social implications: The paper debates the poential social and economic impact brought by blockchain. Originality/value: This paper is one of the first studies to examine the current state of blockchain diffusion within supply chains. It lays a firm foundation for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?—A Systematic Review
Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163477 · Cited by 2,317
Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts
Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., & Papamanthou, C. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2016.55 · Cited by 2,227
1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives
Kshetri, N. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005 · Cited by 2,149
Blockchain technology: principles and applications
Pilkington, M. (2016) · Research Handbook on Digital Transformations · doi:10.4337/9781784717766.00019 · Cited by 1,627
Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia
Wright, A., & De Filippi, P. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2580664 · Cited by 928 · cited 1×
“…(a peer-to-peer distributed data infrastructure) enables the creation of decentralized currencies (e.g. Bitcoin), selfexecuting digital contracts (smart contracts) and intelligent assets that can be controlled over the Internet (smart property) ( Kosba et al., 2016; Wright and De Filippi, 2015).”
BackgroundCan blockchain strengthen the internet of things?
Kshetri, N. (2017) · IT Professional · doi:10.1109/mitp.2017.3051335 · Cited by 918
Towards blockchain-based intelligent transportation systems
Yuan, Y., & Wang, F.-Y. (2016) · 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc.2016.7795984 · Cited by 671
Blockchains everywhere - a use-case of blockchains in the pharma supply-chain
Bocek, T., Rodrigues, B. B., Strasser, T., & Stiller, B. (2017) · 2017 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM) · doi:10.23919/inm.2017.7987376 · Cited by 585
Adaptable Blockchain-Based Systems: A Case Study for Product Traceability
Lu, Q., & Xu, X. (2017) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2017.4121227 · Cited by 483
Information Sharing for Supply Chain Management Based on Block Chain Technology
Nakasumi, M. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) · doi:10.1109/cbi.2017.56 · Cited by 251
Cited by
Dutta, P., Choi, T.-M., Somani, S., & Butala, R. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.102067 · Cited by 1,545
Public and private blockchain in construction business process and information integration
Yang, R., Wakefield, R., Lyu, S., Jayasuriya, S., Han, F., Yi, X., Yang, X., Amarasinghe, G., & Chen, S. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103276 · Cited by 490
Lohmer, J., Bugert, N., & Lasch, R. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107882 · Cited by 404
Blockchain-based life cycle assessment: An implementation framework and system architecture
Zhang, A., Zhong, R. Y., Farooque, M., Kang, K., & Venkatesh, V. G. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104512 · Cited by 319
Nandi, M. L., Nandi, S., Moya, H., & Kaynak, H. (2020) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-12-2019-0444 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Han, J. H., & Beynon-Davies, P.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-01-14
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-84
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2896376638
- Cited by
- 1,210
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 18.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding blockchain technology for future supply chains: a systematic literature review and research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/scm-03-2018-0148
- The paper
- Wang, Y., Han, J. H., & Beynon-Davies, P. (2019). Understanding blockchain technology for future supply chains: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-03-2018-0148
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.