The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of static and dynamic activities using uniaxial accelerometers
Open accessAbstract
Rehabilitation treatment may be improved by objective analysis of activities of daily living. For this reason, the feasibility of distinguishing several static and dynamic activities (standing, sitting, lying, walking, ascending stairs, descending stairs, cycling) using a small set of two or three uniaxial accelerometers signals can be measured with a portable data acquisition system, which potentially makes it possible to perform online detection of static and dynamic activities in the home environment. However, the procedures described in this paper have yet to be evaluated in the home environment. Experiments were conducted on ten healthy subjects, with accelerometers mounted on several positions and orientations on the body, performing static and dynamic activities according to a fixed protocol. Specifically, accelerometers on the sternum and thigh were evaluated. These accelerometers were oriented in the sagittal plane, perpendicular to the long axis of the segment (tangential), or along this axis (radial). First, discrimination between the static or dynamic character of activities was investigated. This appeared to be feasible using an rms-detector applied on the signal of one sensor tangentially mounted on the thigh. Second, the distinction between static activities was investigated. Standing, sitting, lying supine, on a side and prone could be distinguished by observing the static signals of two accelerometers, one mounted tangentially on the thigh, and the second mounted radially on the sternum. Third, the distinction between the cyclical dynamic activities walking, stair ascent, stair descent and cycling was investigated. The discriminating potentials of several features of the accelerometer signals were assessed: the mean value, the standard deviation, the cycle time and the morphology. Signal morphology was expressed by the maximal cross-correlation coefficients with template signals for the different dynamic activities. The mean signal values and signal morphology of accelerometers mounted tangentially on the thigh and the sternum appeared to contribute to the discrimination of dynamic activities with varying detection performances. The standard deviation of the signal and the cycle time were primarily related to the speed of the dynamic activities, and did not contribute to the discrimination of the activities. Therefore, discrimination of dynamic activities on the basis of the combined evaluation of the mean signal value and signal morphology is proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Review of Accelerometry-Based Wearable Motion Detectors for Physical Activity Monitoring
Yang, C.-C., & Hsu, Y.-L. (2010) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s100807772 · Cited by 1,058
Mayagoitia, R. E., Nene, A. V., & Veltink, P. H. (2002) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00231-7 · Cited by 655
Self-citationDirect measurement of human movement by accelerometry
Godfrey, A., Conway, R., Meagher, D., & ÓLaighin, G. (2008) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.005 · Cited by 591
Preprocessing techniques for context recognition from accelerometer data
Figo, D., Diniz, P. C., Ferreira, D. R., & Cardoso, J. M. P. (2010) · Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1007/s00779-010-0293-9 · Cited by 578
Activity Recognition of Assembly Tasks Using Body-Worn Microphones and Accelerometers
Ward, J. A., Lukowicz, P., Troster, G., & Starner, T. E. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.197 · Cited by 431
Estimating Three-Dimensional Orientation of Human Body Parts by Inertial/Magnetic Sensing
Sabatini, A. M. (2011) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s110201489 · Cited by 349
Physical Activity Classification Using the GENEA Wrist-Worn Accelerometer
ZHANG, S., ROWLANDS, A. V., MURRAY, P., & HURST, T. L. (2012) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31823bf95c · Cited by 233
Ambulatory monitoring of physical activities in patients with Parkinson’s disease
Salarian, A., Russmann, H., Vingerhoets, F. J. G., Burkhard, P. R., & Aminian, K. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2007.896591 · Cited by 217
Evaluation of zero-velocity detectors for foot-mounted inertial navigation systems
Skog, I., Nilsson, J.-O., & Handel, P. (2010) · 2010 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation · doi:10.1109/ipin.2010.5646936 · Cited by 213
Clinical Applications of Sensors for Human Posture and Movement Analysis: A Review
Wong, W. Y., Wong, M. S., & Lo, K. H. (2007) · Prosthetics & Orthotics International · doi:10.1080/03093640600983949 · Cited by 193
Nijsen, T. M. E., Arends, J. B. A. M., Griep, P. A. M., & Cluitmans, P. J. M. (2005) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.04.011 · Cited by 139
Gait analysis using gravitational acceleration measured by wearable sensors
Takeda, R., Tadano, S., Todoh, M., Morikawa, M., Nakayasu, M., & Yoshinari, S. (2009) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.027 · Cited by 128
Hasenbring, M. I., Plaas, H., Fischbein, B., & Willburger, R. (2006) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.11.004 · Cited by 124
Bergmann, J. H., Mayagoitia, R. E., & Smith, I. C. (2009) · Dynamic Medicine · doi:10.1186/1476-5918-8-3 · Cited by 88
Drift Removal for Improving the Accuracy of Gait Parameters Using Wearable Sensor Systems
Takeda, R., Lisco, G., Fujisawa, T., Gastaldi, L., Tohyama, H., & Tadano, S. (2014) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s141223230 · Cited by 84
Wearables, smartphones, and artificial intelligence for digital phenotyping and health
Perez-Pozuelo, I., Spathis, D., Clifton, E. A., & Mascolo, C. (2020) · Elsevier · doi:10.17863/cam.60922 · Cited by 47
Real-time elderly activity monitoring system based on a tri-axial accelerometer
Kang, D. W., Choi, J. S., Lee, J. W., Chung, S. C., Park, S. J., & Tack, G. R. (2010) · Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology · doi:10.3109/17483101003718112 · Cited by 43
Segmenting accelerometer data from daily life with unsupervised machine learning
van Kuppevelt, D., Heywood, J., Hamer, M., Sabia, S., Fitzsimons, E., & van Hees, V. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208692 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Veltink, P. H., Bussmann, H. J., de Vries, W., Martens, W. J., & Van Lummel, R. C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 375-385
- ISSN
- 1063-6528 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0024
- OpenAlex
- W2169776910
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.