Cited by 29Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

CMNet: A Connect-and-Merge Convolutional Neural Network for Fast Vehicle Detection in Urban Traffic Surveillance

Open access
Zhang, Fukai, Yang, Feng, Li, Ce, Yuan, Guan·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

A wide variety of vehicle detection approaches using the deep convolutional neural network (CNN) have achieved great success in recent years. However, the existing CNN-based feature extraction algorithms, especially residual network, cannot obtain powerful semantic information in the vehicle detection task, and thus suffer from the problem of a missing detection, error detection, or repeated detection. In this paper, we present a connect-and-merge convolutional neural network (CMNet) for fast detecting vehicles in complex scenes. First, we propose a connect-and-merge residual network (CMRN) for performing feature extraction. Specifically, the CMRN assembles residual branches in parallel through a connect-and-merge mapping: Connect the input to the outputs of two residual branches separately (Connect), and merge the outputs of the connection as the input of the subsequent residual block (Merge), respectively. Second, we present a multi-scale prediction network (MSPN) to accurately regress the vehicle shape and classify vehicle fine-grained categories. In addition, the feature maps from the CMRN are merged with their corresponding upsampled features from the MSPN using concatenation. Thus, we can improve the information flow of the framework and make it easy to train. The experimental results on the KITTI dataset and the UA-DETRAC dataset demonstrate that the CMNet can achieve efficient detection performance in terms of accuracy and speed for the real-world traffic surveillance data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2919103

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, F., Yang, F., Li, C., & Yuan, G.
Affiliations
  • China University of Mining and Technology - Beijing (CN)
  • Guilin University of Electronic Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
72660-72671
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947050565
Cited by
29
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2016QJ04)
  • Yue Qi Young Scholar Project of CUMTB
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61601466)
  • Guangxi Key Laboratory of Trusted Software (KX201613)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
vehicle detection, urban traffic surveillance, ResNet, feature extraction, semantic information, real-time detection, KITTI dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review