The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 4 are not checked yet.
A Survey of Data Mining and Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security Intrusion Detection
Abstract
This survey paper describes a focused literature survey of machine learning (ML) and data mining (DM) methods for cyber analytics in support of intrusion detection. Short tutorial descriptions of each ML/DM method are provided. Based on the number of citations or the relevance of an emerging method, papers representing each method were identified, read, and summarized. Because data are so important in ML/DM approaches, some well-known cyber data sets used in ML/DM are described. The complexity of ML/DM algorithms is addressed, discussion of challenges for using ML/DM for cyber security is presented, and some recommendations on when to use a given method are provided.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The C4.5 algorithm [200], the ID3 algorithm [199], and the CART algorithm [55] are among the well-known decision tree algorithms used for intrusion detection.”
From Comparative Analysis of Intrusion Detection Systems and Machine Learning Based Model Analysis through Decision Tree (2023) · cites this paper as [55]
In the citing paper
“Though there are various surveys on ML in networking [18,61,82,142,246,339], this survey is purposefully different.”
From A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: Evolution, applications and research opportunities (2018) · cites this paper as [82]
In the citing paper
“Whereas, Fadlullah et al. [142] and Buczak et al. [82], both state-of-theart surveys, have a specialized treatment of ML to specific problems in networking.”
From A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: Evolution, applications and research opportunities (2018) · cites this paper as [82]
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (2002) · Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/icnn.1995.488968 · Cited by 58,192
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Zadeh, L. A. (1996) · Cited by 46,960
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. (2000) · Statistics for Engineering and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1 · Cited by 46,387
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
Witten, I. H., Frank, E., & Hall, M. A. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5 · Cited by 25,543
(1992) · Cited by 23,431
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Shearer, 2000, The CRISP-DM model: The new blueprint for data mining, J. Data Warehouse., 5, 13
- 2000, R Core Team
- Jacobson, 1989, The Tcpdump Manual Page
- Combs, 2014, Wireshark
- 2014, Sourcefire
- Stolfo, 2014, KDD Cup 1999 Data Set
- 2015, IBM
- 10.4108/wkdd.2008.2686 · DOI
- 2014, Politecnico di Torino, Analyzer 3.0
- Baralis, 2008, Generalized Itemset Discovery by Means of Opportunistic Aggregation
- Markov, 1971, Extension of the limit theorems of probability theory to a sum of variables connected in a chain, Dynamic Probabilistic Systems, 1
- 10.2307/2984875 · DOI
- Brauckhoff, 2008, Flame: A low-level anomaly modeling engine
- Paxson, 2004, Bro 0.9
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Deep Learning Approach for Intrusion Detection Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Yin, C., Zhu, Y., Fei, J., & He, X. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2762418 · Cited by 2,100
Survey of intrusion detection systems: Techniques, datasets and challenges
Khraisat, A., Gondal, I., Vamplew, P., & Kamruzzaman, J. (2019) · Cybersecurity · doi:10.1186/s42400-019-0038-7 · Cited by 2,024
“AIDS methods can be categorized into three main groups: Statistics-based (Chao et al., 2015), knowledge-based (Elhag et al., 2015; Can & Sahingoz, 2015), and machine learning-based (Buczak & Guven, 2016; Mesh-ram & Haas, 2017).”
Deep Learning in Mobile and Wireless Networking: A Survey
Zhang, C., Patras, P., & Haddadi, H. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2904897 · Cited by 1,913
A Survey of Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Internet of Things (IoT) Security
Al-Garadi, M. A., Mohamed, A., Al-Ali, A. K., Du, X., Ali, I., & Guizani, M. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2988293 · Cited by 1,392
Ahmad, Z., Khan, A. S., Shiang, C. W., Abdullah, J., & Ahmad, F. (2020) · Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · doi:10.1002/ett.4150 · Cited by 1,514
Time Series FeatuRe Extraction on basis of Scalable Hypothesis tests (tsfresh – A Python package)
Christ, M., Braun, N., Neuffer, J., & Kempa-Liehr, A. W. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.03.067 · Cited by 1,282
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Cybersecurity
Xin, Y., Kong, L., Liu, Z., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Zhu, H., Gao, M., Hou, H., & Wang, C. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2836950 · Cited by 1,228
Deep learning for cyber security intrusion detection: Approaches, datasets, and comparative study
Ferrag, M. A., Maglaras, L. A., Moschoyiannis, S., & Janicke, H. (2019) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2019.102419 · Cited by 1,386
“Buczak et al. [8] presented a study of machine learning approaches used by the intrusion detection systems.”
MethodMachine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Survey
Liu, H., & Lang, B. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9204396 · Cited by 1,133
“Several previous surveys [3–5] have classified research efforts by their applied machine learning algorithms.”
BackgroundDeep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey
Borisov, V., Leemann, T., Seßler, K., Haug, J., Pawelczyk, M., & Kasneci, G. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3229161 · Cited by 1,400
Boutaba, R., Salahuddin, M. A., Limam, N., Ayoubi, S., Shahriar, N., Estrada-Solano, F., & Caicedo, O. M. (2018) · Journal of Internet Services and Applications · doi:10.1186/s13174-018-0087-2 · Cited by 1,036
“More recently, [82] looked at the application of Data Mining and ML for cyber-security intrusion detection.”
BackgroundInfluentialA survey of network-based intrusion detection data sets
Ring, M., Wunderlich, S., Scheuring, D., Landes, D., & Andreas Hotho, A. (2019) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2019.06.005 · Cited by 977
Network Intrusion Detection for IoT Security Based on Learning Techniques
Chaabouni, N., Mosbah, M., Zemmari, A., Sauvignac, C., & Faruki, P. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2896380 · Cited by 1,000
Alsaedi, A., Moustafa, N., Tari, Z., Mahmood, A. N., & Anwar, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3022862 · Cited by 1,051
A Survey on the Internet of Things (IoT) Forensics: Challenges, Approaches, and Open Issues
Stoyanova, M., Nikoloudakis, Y., Panagiotakis, S., Pallis, E., & Markakis, E. K. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2962586 · Cited by 852
Machine Learning in IoT Security: Current Solutions and Future Challenges
Hussain, F., Hussain, R., Hassan, S. A., & Hossain, E. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2986444 · Cited by 129
Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Review
Nassif, A. B., Talib, M. A., Nasir, Q., & Dakalbab, F. M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3083060 · Cited by 748
A Detailed Investigation and Analysis of Using Machine Learning Techniques for Intrusion Detection
Mishra, P., Varadharajan, V., Tupakula, U. K., & Pilli, E. S. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2847722 · Cited by 769
Xie, J., Yu, F. R., Huang, T., Xie, R., Liu, J., Wang, C., & Liu, Y. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2866942 · Cited by 700
IoT Security Techniques Based on Machine Learning: How Do IoT Devices Use AI to Enhance Security?
Xiao, L., Wan, X., Lu, X., Zhang, Y., & Wu, D. (2018) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2825478 · Cited by 681
“ML techniques such as SVMs, K-NNs, and NNs have been used for intrusion detection [15].”
MethodWang, W., Sheng, Y., Wang, J., Zeng, X., Ye, X., Huang, Y., & Zhu, M. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2780250 · Cited by 685
A Survey of Deep Learning: Platforms, Applications and Emerging Research Trends
Hatcher, W. G., & Yu, W. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2830661 · Cited by 654
A Survey on Industrial Internet of Things: A Cyber-Physical Systems Perspective
Xu, H., Yu, W., Griffith, D., & Golmie, N. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2884906 · Cited by 637
An Overview on Application of Machine Learning Techniques in Optical Networks
Musumeci, F., Rottondi, C., Nag, A., Irene Macaluso, B., Zibar, D., Ruffini, M., & Tornatore, M. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2880039 · Cited by 644
Unsupervised Machine Learning for Networking: Techniques, Applications and Research Challenges
Usama, M., Qadir, J., Raza, A., Arif, H., Yau, K. A., Elkhatib, Y., Hussain, A., & Al‐Fuqaha, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2916648 · Cited by 662
A Survey of Deep Learning Methods for Cyber Security
Berman, D. S., Buczak, A. L., Chavis, J. S., & Corbett, C. L. (2019) · Information · doi:10.3390/info10040122 · Cited by 569
Self-citationSmart Cities: A Survey on Data Management, Security, and Enabling Technologies
Gharaibeh, A., Salahuddin, M. A., Hussini, S. J., Khreishah, A., Khalil, I., Guizani, M., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2736886 · Cited by 628
Thirty Years of Machine Learning: The Road to Pareto-Optimal Wireless Networks
Wang, J., Jiang, C., Zhang, H., Ren, Y., Chen, K.-C., & Hanzo, L. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2965856 · Cited by 568
A Survey on Machine Learning Techniques for Cyber Security in the Last Decade
Shaukat, K., Luo, S., Varadharajan, V., Hameed, I. A., & Xu, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3041951 · Cited by 607
Hossain, E., Khan, I., Un-Noor, F., Sikander, S. S., & Sunny, M. S. H. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2894819 · Cited by 536
“[248] A. L. Buczak and E. Guven, ‘‘A survey of data mining and machine learning methods for cyber security intrusion detection,’’ IEEE Commun.”
BackgroundKhraisat, A., & Alazab, A. (2021) · Cybersecurity · doi:10.1186/s42400-021-00077-7 · Cited by 578
Pajouh, H. H., Javidan, R., Khayami, R., Dehghantanha, A., & Choo, K. R. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing · doi:10.1109/tetc.2016.2633228 · Cited by 504
Real-time big data processing for anomaly detection: A survey
Ariyaluran Habeeb, R. A., Nasaruddin, F., Gani, A., Targio Hashem, I. A., Ahmed, E., & Imran, M. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.08.006 · Cited by 487
Wahab, O. A., Mourad, A., Otrok, H., & Taleb, T. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3058573 · Cited by 506
Deep reinforcement learning for cyber security
Nguyen, T. T., & Reddi, V. J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3121870 · Cited by 620
Machine learning based solutions for security of Internet of Things (IoT): A survey
Tahsien, S. M., Karimipour, H., & Spachos, P. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102630 · Cited by 499
“being used to detect the intrusion attack [88], [147][148].”
BackgroundMethodAdversarial Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detection Systems: A Comprehensive Survey
He, K., Kim, D. S., & Asghar, M. R. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2022.3233793 · Cited by 518
CICIDS-2017 Dataset Feature Analysis With Information Gain for Anomaly Detection
Kurniabudi, K., Stiawan, D., Darmawijoyo, Idris, M. Y., Bamhdi, A. M., & Budiarto, R. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3009843 · Cited by 457
Explainable Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cyber Security: State-of-the-Art in Research
Zhang, Z., Hamadi, H. A., Damiani, E., Yeun, C. Y., & Taher, F. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3204051 · Cited by 450
Sharma, S. K., & Wang, X. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2916177 · Cited by 454
“In addition, Neural Networks (NNs) can be utilized to detect network intrusion and in this context, authors in [31] have provided a comprehensive review of ML and data mining techniques for intrusion detection in cyber analytic applications.”
BackgroundVariational LSTM Enhanced Anomaly Detection for Industrial Big Data
Zhou, X., Hu, Y., Liang, W., Ma, J., & Jin, Q. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2020.3022432 · Cited by 403
Lucid: A Practical, Lightweight Deep Learning Solution for DDoS Attack Detection
Doriguzzi-Corin, R., Millar, S., Scott-Hayward, S., Martínez-del-Rincón, J., & Siracusa, D. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2020.2971776 · Cited by 393
An intrusion detection system for connected vehicles in smart cities
Aloqaily, M., Otoum, S., Ridhawi, I. A., & Jararweh, Y. (2019) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2019.02.001 · Cited by 394
Deep learning methods in network intrusion detection: A survey and an objective comparison
Gamage, S., & Samarabandu, J. K. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102767 · Cited by 422
A GA-LR wrapper approach for feature selection in network intrusion detection
Khammassi, C., & Krichen, S. (2017) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2017.06.005 · Cited by 384
“This process is repeated until a leaf node is reached which represents the class of the tested instance (Buczak and Guven, 2016).”
BackgroundA comprehensive survey on network anomaly detection
Fernandes, G., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Carvalho, L. F., Al-Muhtadi, J. F., & Proença, M. L. (2018) · Telecommunication Systems · doi:10.1007/s11235-018-0475-8 · Cited by 396
A Survey of Random Forest Based Methods for Intrusion Detection Systems
Resende, P. A. A., & Drummond, A. C. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3178582 · Cited by 403
“For example, Buczak and Guven (2016) provide two paragraphs for a Random Forest review and cite three works which use this method.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPacheco, F., Expósito, E., Gineste, M., Baudoin, C., & Aguilar, J. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2883147 · Cited by 387
Thakkar, A., & Lohiya, R. (2020) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-020-09496-0 · Cited by 412
Artificial intelligence, cyber-threats and industry 4.0: challenges and opportunities
Bécue, A., Praça, I., & Gama, J. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09942-2 · Cited by 368
Zhang, F., Kodituwakku, H. A. D. E., Hines, J. W., & Coble, J. B. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2891261 · Cited by 371
A systematic literature review of methods and datasets for anomaly-based network intrusion detection
Yang, Z., Liu, X., Li, T., Wu, D., Wang, J., Zhao, Y., & Han, H. (2022) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2022.102675 · Cited by 410
An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Intrusion Detection Systems
Wang, M., Zheng, K., Yang, Y., & Wang, X. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2988359 · Cited by 401
Intrusion Detection System for Healthcare Systems Using Medical and Network Data: A Comparison Study
Hady, A. A., Ghubaish, A., Salman, T., Ünal, D., & Jain, R. K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3000421 · Cited by 390
On the effectiveness of machine and deep learning for cyber security
Apruzzese, G., Colajanni, M., Ferretti, L., Guido, A., & Marchetti, M. (2018) · doi:10.23919/cycon.2018.8405026 · Cited by 420
TSDL: A Two-Stage Deep Learning Model for Efficient Network Intrusion Detection
Khan, F. A., Gumaei, A., Derhab, A., & Hussain, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2899721 · Cited by 373
Thakkar, A., & Lohiya, R. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-10037-9 · Cited by 394
From Fluid Flow to Coupled Processes in Fractured Rock: Recent Advances and New Frontiers
Viswanathan, H., Ajo‐Franklin, J., Birkhölzer, J., Carey, J. W., Guglielmi, Y., Hyman, J. D., Karra, S., Pyrak‐Nolte, L. J., Rajaram, H., Srinivasan, G., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2021rg000744 · Cited by 349
Building Auto-Encoder Intrusion Detection System based on random forest feature selection
Li, X., Chen, W., Zhang, Q., & Wu, L. (2020) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2020.101851 · Cited by 340
IntruDTree: A Machine Learning Based Cyber Security Intrusion Detection Model
Sarker, I. H., Abushark, Y. B., Alsolami, F., & Khan, A. I. (2020) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym12050754 · Cited by 356
Robust detection for network intrusion of industrial IoT based on multi-CNN fusion
Li, Y., Xu, Y., Liu, Z., Hou, H., Zheng, Y., Xin, Y., Zhao, Y., & Cui, L. (2019) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107450 · Cited by 354
Asharf, J., Moustafa, N., Khurshid, H., Debie, E., Haider, W., & Wahab, A. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9071177 · Cited by 378
“There are other studies [35,36], which discussed the feasibility of both ML and data mining techniques to detect intrusions in IoT networks by implementing these techniques in IDSs either through detecting anomalies or classification of traffic.”
BackgroundData-Driven Cybersecurity Incident Prediction: A Survey
Sun, N., Zhang, J., Rimba, P., Gao, S., Zhang, L. Y., & Xiang, Y. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2885561 · Cited by 343
Application of deep learning to cybersecurity: A survey
Mahdavifar, S., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.02.056 · Cited by 356
Survey of Attack Projection, Prediction, and Forecasting in Cyber Security
Husák, M., Komárková, J., Bou‐Harb, E., & Čeleda, P. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2871866 · Cited by 322
A survey on attack detection, estimation and control of industrial cyber–physical systems
Zhang, D., Wang, Q., Feng, G., Shi, Y., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2021) · ISA Transactions · doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2021.01.036 · Cited by 318
A holistic review of Network Anomaly Detection Systems: A comprehensive survey
Moustafa, N., Hu, J., & Slay, J. (2018) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.12.006 · Cited by 318
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence Capabilities to Improve Cybersecurity
Zeadally, S., Adi, E., Baig, Z. A., & Khan, I. A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2968045 · Cited by 359
Blockchain and Machine Learning for Communications and Networking Systems
Liu, Y., Yu, F. R., Li, X., Ji, H., & Leung, V. C. M. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2975911 · Cited by 332
Enterprise data breach: causes, challenges, prevention, and future directions
Cheng, L., Liu, F., & Yao, D. D. (2017) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1211 · Cited by 308
Performance Comparison and Current Challenges of Using Machine Learning Techniques in Cybersecurity
Shaukat, K., Luo, S., Varadharajan, V., Hameed, I. A., Chen, S., Liu, D., & Li, J. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13102509 · Cited by 335
“On the DARPA dataset, NB and ANN performed better accuracy than other models, but ANN has given worse precision value on DARPA dataset.”
InfluentialA Self-Adaptive Deep Learning-Based System for Anomaly Detection in 5G Networks
Maimó, L. F., Gómez, Á. L. P., Clemente, F. J. G., Pérez, M. G., & Pérez, G. M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2803446 · Cited by 302
“They moved from inspecting raw network packets to analyzing traffic network flows with innovative AI-based techniques [7].”
BackgroundDeepCoin: A Novel Deep Learning and Blockchain-Based Energy Exchange Framework for Smart Grids
Ferrag, M. A., & Maglaras, L. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2019.2922936 · Cited by 358
A survey of edge computing-based designs for IoT security
Sha, K., Yang, T. A., Wei, W., & Davari, S. (2020) · Digital Communications and Networks · doi:10.1016/j.dcan.2019.08.006 · Cited by 295
Detecting crypto-ransomware in IoT networks based on energy consumption footprint
Azmoodeh, A., Dehghantanha, A., Conti, M., & Choo, K. R. (2017) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-017-0558-5 · Cited by 295
“Similar to the approach in (Buczak and Guven 2016), we use the following four common performance indicators for malware detection:”
MethodA Review of the Advancement in Intrusion Detection Datasets
Thakkar, A., & Lohiya, R. (2020) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.330 · Cited by 293
The Role of Machine Learning in Cybersecurity
Apruzzese, G., Laskov, P., de, E. M., Mallouli, W., Búrdalo, L., Grammatopoulos, A. V., & Franco, F. D. (2022) · Digital Threats Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3545574 · Cited by 359
An Unsupervised Deep Learning Model for Early Network Traffic Anomaly Detection
Hwang, R., Peng, M.-C., Huang, C., Lin, P., & Nguyen, V.-L. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2973023 · Cited by 301
Malicious URL Detection using Machine Learning: A SurveyPreprint
Sahoo, D., Liu, C., & Hoi, S. C. H. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.07179 · Cited by 430
“fy the limitations of the current models [162], and provide directions for future research. 7 RELATED SURVEYS Recent years have witnessed innovative applications of machine learning in cyber security [26, 52, 164]. They discuss a variety of other cyber threats, and do not focus on Malicious URL Detection. For example,…”
BackgroundBlockchain Security: A Survey of Techniques and Research Directions
Leng, J., Zhou, M., Zhao, J. L., Huang, Y., & Bian, Y. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2020.3038641 · Cited by 295
A Taxonomy of Network Threats and the Effect of Current Datasets on Intrusion Detection Systems
Hindy, H., Brosset, D., Bayne, E., Seeam, A. K., Tachtatzis, C., Atkinson, R. C., & Bellekens, X. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3000179 · Cited by 283
A systematic literature review for network intrusion detection system (IDS)
Abdulganiyu, O. H., Ait Tchakoucht, T., & Saheed, Y. K. (2023) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-023-00682-2 · Cited by 279
The rise of traffic classification in IoT networks: A survey
Tahaei, H., Afifi, F., Asemi, A., Zaki, F., & Anuar, N. B. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102538 · Cited by 278
Ferrag, M. A., Maglaras, L. A., Argyriou, A., Kosmanos, D., & Janicke, H. (2017) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2017.10.017 · Cited by 277
“section III-B, data mining and machine learning methods are used to help discover, determine, and identify unauthorized use and destruction of information systems, such as 4G and 5G cellular networks [246]. Buczak 19 and Guven [246] have found that the most intrusion detection systems used the DARPA 1998, DARPA 1999,…”
MethodA Machine Learning Security Framework for Iot Systems
Bagaa, M., Taleb, T., Bernabe, J. B., & Skarmeta, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2996214 · Cited by 271
Machine Learning-Powered Encrypted Network Traffic Analysis: A Comprehensive Survey
Shen, M., Ye, K., Liu, X., Zhu, L., Kang, J., Yu, S., Li, Q. L., & Xu, K. (2022) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2022.3208196 · Cited by 306
Cybersecurity, Data Privacy and Blockchain: A Review
Wylde, V., Rawindaran, N., Lawrence, J., et al. (2022) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-022-01020-4 · Cited by 266
Ullah, A., Anwar, S. M., Li, J., Nadeem, L., Mahmood, T., Rehman, A. U., & Saba, T. (2023) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-023-01175-4 · Cited by 333
Machine learning in cybersecurity: a comprehensive survey
Dasgupta, D., Akhtar, Z., & Sen, S. (2020) · The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology · doi:10.1177/1548512920951275 · Cited by 262
An Evolutionary SVM Model for DDOS Attack Detection in Software Defined Networks
Sahoo, K. S., Tripathy, B. K., Naik, K., Ramasubbareddy, S., Balusamy, B., Khari, M., & Burgos, D. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3009733 · Cited by 261
A review of Machine Learning-based zero-day attack detection: Challenges and future directions
Guo, Y. (2022) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2022.11.001 · Cited by 319
“While multiple surveys have been conducted on intrusion detection and malware detection using various approaches [14–18], none has been focused on ML-based zero-day attack detection schemes.”
Azam, Z., Islam, M. M., & Huda, M. N. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3296444 · Cited by 265
A survey on evolutionary machine learning
Al-Sahaf, H., Bi, Y., Chen, Q., Lensen, A., Mei, Y., Sun, Y., Tran, B., Xue, B., & Zhang, M. (2019) · Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · doi:10.1080/03036758.2019.1609052 · Cited by 263
“…predict natural disaster, especially earthquake (Asim et al. 2018; Scoble et al. 2013), and other real-world problems, such as web service composition (da Silva et al. 2016), cloud computing (Guzek et al. 2015), cyber security (Buczak and Guven 2016), and video games (Yannakakis and Togelius 2018).”
BackgroundThakkar, A., & Lohiya, R. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.026 · Cited by 258
A survey on graph neural networks for intrusion detection systems: Methods, trends and challenges
Zhong, M., Lin, M., Zhang, C., & Xu, Z. (2024) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2024.103821 · Cited by 300
Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection for Distributed Denial of Service Attack in Agriculture 4.0
Ferrag, M. A., Shu, L., Hamouda, D., & Choo, K. R. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10111257 · Cited by 277
Survey on Explainable AI: From Approaches, Limitations and Applications Aspects
Yang, W., Wei, Y.-C., Wei, H., Chen, Y., Huang, G., Li, X., Li, R., Yao, N., Wang, X., Gu, X., et al. (2023) · Human-Centric Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s44230-023-00038-y · Cited by 303
Neupane, S., Ables, J., Anderson, W. S., Mittal, S., Rahimi, S., Banicescu, I., & Seale, M. A. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3216617 · Cited by 293
Flow-based network traffic generation using Generative Adversarial Networks
Ring, M., Schlör, D., Landes, D., & Andreas Hotho, A. (2018) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2018.12.012 · Cited by 261
“Recently, Buczak and Guven [1] presented an overview of the community effort with regard to this issue.”
BackgroundAI-Based Two-Stage Intrusion Detection for Software Defined IoT Networks
Li, J., Zhao, Z., Li, R., & Zhang, H. (2018) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2883344 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- ORCID
- Buczak, Anna L.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1153-1176
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- 2373-745X
- OpenAlex
- W2342408547
- Semantic Scholar
- 971766088dfaf63fb55e6f0190b14f28f2c98ad0
- Cited by
- 3,332
- References
- 119
- Citations by year
- 2026: 460 · 2025: 395 · 2024: 297 · 2023: 319 · 2022: 403 · 2021: 447 · 2020: 394 · 2019: 314 · 2018: 217 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 11
- FWCI
- 115.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Homeland Security Network Security Deployment Division (HSSA01-13-C-2709)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Immune Systems Applications
- Keywords
- intrusion detection, cybersecurity, machine learning, data mining, algorithmic complexity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review