The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multimodal Spontaneous Emotion Corpus for Human Behavior Analysis
Abstract
Emotion is expressed in multiple modalities, yet most research has considered at most one or two. This stems in part from the lack of large, diverse, well-annotated, multimodal databases with which to develop and test algorithms. We present a well-annotated, multimodal, multidimensional spontaneous emotion corpus of 140 participants. Emotion inductions were highly varied. Data were acquired from a variety of sensors of the face that included high-resolution 3D dynamic imaging, high-resolution 2D video, and thermal (infrared) sensing, and contact physiological sensors that included electrical conductivity of the skin, respiration, blood pressure, and heart rate. Facial expression was annotated for both the occurrence and intensity of facial action units from 2D video by experts in the Facial Action Coding System (FACS). The corpus further includes derived features from 3D, 2D, and IR (infrared) sensors and baseline results for facial expression and action unit detection. The entire corpus will be made available to the research community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What are emotions? And how can they be measured?
Scherer, K. R. (2005) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/0539018405058216 · Cited by 4,264
A Survey of Affect Recognition Methods: Audio, Visual, and Spontaneous Expressions
Zeng, Z., Pantic, M., Roisman, G. I., & Huang, T. S. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2008.52 · Cited by 2,797
A 3D Facial Expression Database For Facial Behavior Research
Yin, L., Wei, X., Sun, Y., Wang, J., & Rosato, M. J. (2006) · 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FGR06) · doi:10.1109/fgr.2006.6 · Cited by 1,171
Self-citationMcKeown, G., Valstar, M., Cowie, R., Pantic, M., & Schroder, M. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2011.20 · Cited by 665
Wang, S., Liu, Z., Lv, S., Lv, Y., Wu, G., Peng, P., Chen, F., & Wang, X. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2010.2060716 · Cited by 397
Static and dynamic 3D facial expression recognition: A comprehensive survey
Sandbach, G., Zafeiriou, S., Pantic, M., & Yin, L. (2012) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2012.06.005 · Cited by 357
Self-citationFERA 2015 - second Facial Expression Recognition and Analysis challenge
Valstar, M. F., Almaev, T., Girard, J. M., McKeown, G., Mehu, M., Yin, L., Pantic, M., & Cohn, J. F. (2015) · 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG) · doi:10.1109/fg.2015.7284874 · Cited by 252
Self-citationAutomatic coding of facial expressions displayed during posed and genuine pain
Littlewort, G. C., Bartlett, M. S., & Lee, K. (2009) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2008.12.010 · Cited by 216
Cited by
3D Morphable Face Models—Past, Present, and Future
Egger, B., Smith, W. A. P., Tewari, A., Wuhrer, S., Zollhoefer, M., Beeler, T., Bernard, F., Bolkart, T., Kortylewski, A., Romdhani, S., et al. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/3395208 · Cited by 448
Capture, Learning, and Synthesis of 3D Speaking Styles
Cudeiro, D., Bolkart, T., Laidlaw, C., Ranjan, A., & Black, M. J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.01034 · Cited by 365
Liang, T., Lin, G., Feng, L., Zhang, Y., & Lv, F. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00804 · Cited by 93
Nowara, E. M., McDuff, D., & Veeraraghavan, A. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00150 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Girard, J. M., Wu, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, P., Ciftci, U., Canavan, S., Reale, M., Horowitz, A., Yang, H., Cohn, J. F., Ji, Q., & Yin, L.
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-06
- Pages
- 3438-3446
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2470957930
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 34.06
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
