Cited by 665Emotion and Mood RecognitionSocial Robot Interaction and HRISpeech and dialogue systems

The SEMAINE Database: Annotated Multimodal Records of Emotionally Colored Conversations between a Person and a Limited Agent

Open access
McKeown, G., Valstar, M., Cowie, R., Pantic, M., Schroder, M.·2012·IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing

Abstract

SEMAINE has created a large audiovisual database as a part of an iterative approach to building Sensitive Artificial Listener (SAL) agents that can engage a person in a sustained, emotionally colored conversation. Data used to build the agents came from interactions between users and an "operator” simulating a SAL agent, in different configurations: Solid SAL (designed so that operators displayed an appropriate nonverbal behavior) and Semi-automatic SAL (designed so that users' experience approximated interacting with a machine). We then recorded user interactions with the developed system, Automatic SAL, comparing the most communicatively competent version to versions with reduced nonverbal skills. High quality recording was provided by five high-resolution, high-framerate cameras, and four microphones, recorded synchronously. Recordings total 150 participants, for a total of 959 conversations with individual SAL characters, lasting approximately 5 minutes each. Solid SAL recordings are transcribed and extensively annotated: 6-8 raters per clip traced five affective dimensions and 27 associated categories. Other scenarios are labeled on the same pattern, but less fully. Additional information includes FACS annotation on selected extracts, identification of laughs, nods, and shakes, and measures of user engagement with the automatic system. The material is available through a web-accessible database.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/t-affc.2011.20

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKeown, G., Valstar, M., Cowie, R., Pantic, M., & Schroder, M.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
Published
2012-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
5-17
ISSN
1949-3045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132555391
Cited by
665
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 13
FWCI
37.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission (211486)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
nonverbal behavior, facial expression coding, affective domain, user engagement, multimodal interaction, human-computer interaction, affective computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review