Cited by 115Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Exploring scalable medical image encoders beyond text supervision

Open access
Pérez-García, Fernando, Sharma, Harshita, Bond-Taylor, Sam, Bouzid, Kenza, Salvatelli, Valentina, Ilse, Maximilian, Bannur, Shruthi, Castro, Daniel C. +7 more·2025·Nature Machine Intelligence

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42256-024-00965-w

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Yuhao Zhang, Hang Jiang, Yasuhide Miura, Christopher D Manning, and Curtis P Langlotz. Contrastive learning of medical visual representations from paired images and text. In Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference, pages 2-25. PMLR, 2022.
  2. Hong-Yu Zhou, Chenyu Lian, Liansheng Wang, and Yizhou Yu. Advancing radiograph representation learning with masked record modeling. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
  3. Victor Weixin Liang, Yuhui Zhang, Yongchan Kwon, Serena Yeung, and James Y Zou. Mind the gap: Under- standing the modality gap in multi-modal contrastive representation learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:17612-17625, 2022.
  4. Aaron van den Oord, Yazhe Li, and Oriol Vinyals. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748, 2018. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.03748.pdf. · arXiv
  5. Ting Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, and Geoffrey Hinton. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1597-1607. PMLR, 2020. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v119/chen20j/chen20j.pdf.
  6. Namuk Park, Wonjae Kim, Byeongho Heo, Taekyung Kim, and Sangdoo Yun. What do self-supervised vision transformers learn? In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
  7. Shashank Shekhar, Florian Bordes, Pascal Vincent, and Ari S Morcos. Objectives matter: Understanding the impact of self-supervised objectives on vision transformer representations. In ICLR 2023 Workshop on Mathematical and Empirical Understanding of Foundation Models, 2023.
  8. Jinghao Zhou, Chen Wei, Huiyu Wang, Wei Shen, Cihang Xie, Alan Yuille, and Tao Kong. iBOT: image BERT pre-training with online tokenizer. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  9. Hadrien Bertrand, Mohammad Hashir, and Joseph Paul Cohen. Do lateral views help automated chest x-ray predictions? arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08534, 2019. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.08534.pdf. · arXiv
  10. Mohammad Hashir, Hadrien Bertrand, and Joseph Paul Cohen. Quantifying the value of lateral views in deep learning for chest x-rays. In Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, pages 288-303. PMLR, 2020. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v121/hashir20a/hashir20a.pdf.
  11. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. Visual instruction tuning, 2023. URL http: //arxiv.org/abs/2304.08485.
  12. Chin-Yew Lin. ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text Summarization Branches Out, pages 74-81. Association for Computational Linguistics, July 2004. URL https://aclanthology.org/ W04-1013.
  13. Fabian Isensee, Jens Petersen, Andre Klein, David Zimmerer, Paul F. Jaeger, Simon Kohl, Jakob Wasserthal, Gregor Koehler, Tobias Norajitra, Sebastian Wirkert, and Klaus H. Maier-Hein. nnu-net: Self-adapting framework for u-net-based medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.10486, 2018. URL https://arxiv. org/pdf/1809.10486.pdf. · arXiv
  14. Mingxing Tan and Quoc V. Le. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.11946, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.11946.pdf. · arXiv
  15. Jane Bromley, Isabelle Guyon, Yann LeCun, Eduard Säckinger, and Roopak Shah. Signature verification using a "siamese" time delay neural network. In J. Cowan, G. Tesauro, and J. Alspector, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 6. Morgan-Kaufmann, 1993. URL https://proceedings.neurips. cc/paper_files/paper/1993/file/288cc0ff022877bd3df94bc9360b9c5d-Paper.pdf.
  16. Antti Tarvainen and Harri Valpola. Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning results. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  17. Hangbo Bao, Li Dong, Songhao Piao, and Furu Wei. Beit: Bert pre-training of image transformers. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  18. Alexandre Sablayrolles, Matthijs Douze, Cordelia Schmid, and Hervé Jégou. Spreading vectors for similarity search. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
  19. Adrien Bardes, Jean Ponce, and Yann LeCun. Vicregl: Self-supervised learning of local visual features. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:8799-8810, 2022.
  20. Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.08774.pdf. · arXiv
  21. Jiahui Yu, Zirui Wang, Vijay Vasudevan, Legg Yeung, Mojtaba Seyedhosseini, and Yonghui Wu. Coca: Contrastive captioners are image-text foundation models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2022. ISSN 2835-8856.
  22. Eugene Vorontsov, Alican Bozkurt, Adam Casson, George Shaikovski, Michal Zelechowski, Siqi Liu, Philippe Mathieu, Alexander van Eck, Donghun Lee, Julian Viret, Eric Robert, Yi Kan Wang, Jeremy D. Kunz, Matthew C. H. Lee, Jan Bernhard, Ran A. Godrich, Gerard Oakley, Ewan Millar, Matthew Hanna, Juan Retamero, William A. Moye, Razik Yousfi, Christopher Kanan, David Klimstra, Brandon Rothrock, and Thomas J. Fuchs. Virchow: A million-slide digital pathology foundation model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07778, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.07778.pdf. · arXiv
  23. Mark Endo, Rayan Krishnan, Viswesh Krishna, Andrew Y Ng, and Pranav Rajpurkar. Retrieval-based chest x-ray report generation using a pre-trained contrastive language-image model. In Machine Learning for Health, pages 209-219. PMLR, 2021.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pérez-García, F., Sharma, H., Bond-Taylor, S., Bouzid, K., Salvatelli, V., Ilse, M., Bannur, S., Castro, D. C., Schwaighofer, A., Lungren, M. P., Wetscherek, M. T., Codella, N., Hyland, S. L., Alvarez-Valle, J., & Oktay, O.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Sharma, Harshita
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Published
2025-01-13
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
119-130
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406353025
Cited by
115
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 5
FWCI
33.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
vision-language alignment, medical image classification, semantic segmentation, radiology report generation, privacy leakage, multimodal models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review