Cited by 15Advanced Frequency and Time StandardsScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies

International timescales with optical clocks (ITOC)

Margolis, H. S., Godun, R. M., Gill, P., Johnson, L. A. M., Shemar, S. L., Whibberley, P. B., Calonico, D., Levi, F. +17 more·2013·2013 Joint European Frequency and Time Forum & International Frequency Control Symposium (EFTF/IFC)

Abstract

A new collaborative European project “International timescales with optical clocks” (ITOC) aims to tackle the key challenges that must be addressed prior to a redefinition of the SI second. A coordinated programme of comparisons will be carried out between European optical clocks developed in five different laboratories, enabling their performance levels to be validated at an unprecedented level of accuracy. Supporting work will be carried out to evaluate relativistic effects that influence the comparisons, including the gravitational redshift of the clock transition frequencies. A proof-of-principle experiment will also be performed to demonstrate that optical clocks could be used to make direct measurements of the Earth's gravity potential with high temporal resolution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/eftf-ifc.2013.6702183

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EGG2015 is the latest European gravimetric quasigeoid model; its major differences from EGG2008 are the inclusion of additional gravity measurements around major European optical clock sites within the ITOC project and the use of a newer GOCE-based geopotential model instead of EGM2008.

    “The major differences between EGG2015 and the previous EGG2008 model (Denker 2013) are the inclusion of additional gravity measurements carried out recently around all major European optical clock sites within the ITOC project (Margolis et al. 2013; Margolis 2014; see also http://projects. npl.co.uk/itoc/) and the use of a newer geopotential model based on the GOCE satellite mission instead of EGM”
  • The major differences between EGG2015 and EGG2008 are the inclusion of additional gravity measurements around the ITOC clock sites and the use of a newer geopotential model based on GOCE instead of EGM2008.

    “The major differences between EGG2015 and the previous EGG2008 model [134] are the inclusion of additional gravity measurements carried out recently around the aforementioned ITOC clock sites [60] and the use of a newer geopotential model based on the GOCE satellite mission instead of EGM2008.”

    From Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications (2019) · cites this paper as [60]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Margolis, H. S., Godun, R. M., Gill, P., Johnson, L. A. M., Shemar, S. L., Whibberley, P. B., Calonico, D., Levi, F., Lorini, L., Pizzocaro, M., Delva, P., Bize, S., Achkar, J., Denker, H., Timmen, L., Voigt, C., Falke, S., Piester, D., Lisdat, C., Sterr, U., Vogt, S., Weyers, S., Gersl, J., Lindvall, T., & Merimaa, M.
Affiliations
  • National Physical Laboratory (GB)
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
  • Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (IT)
  • Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE)
  • National metrology institute VTT MIKES (FI)
Venue
2013 Joint European Frequency and Time Forum & International Frequency Control Symposium (EFTF/IFC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-07
Pages
908-911
ISSN
1075-6787 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023494863
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
8.02
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Joint Conference of the European Frequency and Time Forum and IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (EFTF/IFCS) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (IRIS Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Time Synchronization Technologies
Keywords
optical clocks, time scales, clock comparison, gravitational redshift, relativistic effects, temporal resolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review